Jaume F. Lalanza, Sonia Lorente, Raimon Bullich, Carlos García, Josep-Maria Losilla, Lluis Capdevila
{"title":"心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)方法:系统综述和指南","authors":"Jaume F. Lalanza, Sonia Lorente, Raimon Bullich, Carlos García, Josep-Maria Losilla, Lluis Capdevila","doi":"10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) “Optimal RF” (<i>n</i> = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) “Individual RF” (<i>n</i> = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) “Preset-pace RF” (<i>n</i> = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":"48 3","pages":"275 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Jaume F. Lalanza, Sonia Lorente, Raimon Bullich, Carlos García, Josep-Maria Losilla, Lluis Capdevila\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) “Optimal RF” (<i>n</i> = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) “Individual RF” (<i>n</i> = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) “Preset-pace RF” (<i>n</i> = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"275 - 297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)已广泛应用于改善心血管健康和福祉。HRVB是基于个人的共振频率呼吸,刺激呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)和气压反射。然而,在如何应用HRVB的方法上没有共识,而关于所使用的协议的细节通常没有很好的报道。因此,本系统综述的目的是描述不同的HRVB方案,并发现方法学上的问题。检索时间为2000年至2021年4月期间的PsycINFO、CINALH、Medline和Web of Science。数据提取和质量评估基于PRISMA指南。来自任何科学领域和任何类型样本的总共143项研究最终被纳入。找到了HRVB的三种方案:(i)“最佳射频”(n = 37),每个参与者在他们先前检测到的射频下呼吸;(ii)“个体射频”(n = 48),每个参与者遵循一个生物反馈装置,该装置实时显示基于心血管数据的最佳呼吸频率;(iii)“预设节奏射频”(n = 51),所有参与者以相同的频率呼吸,通常为6次/分钟。此外,我们还发现了HRVB在周数、呼吸持续时间或实验室和家庭结合方面的几种方法差异。值得注意的是,近2/3的研究没有报告足够的信息来复制HRVB方案,包括呼吸持续时间、吸入/呼出比、呼吸控制或体位。提出了方法学指南和清单,以提高未来HRVB研究的方法学质量,并增加报告的信息。
Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) “Optimal RF” (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) “Individual RF” (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) “Preset-pace RF” (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.
期刊介绍:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.