钝器伤患者锁骨上臂丛神经损伤的可靠初始创伤 CT 结果。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY American Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-06 DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A7919
M R Povlow, J R Davis, A M Betts, S M Clayton, F J Cloran, J K Aden, J L Ritter
{"title":"钝器伤患者锁骨上臂丛神经损伤的可靠初始创伤 CT 结果。","authors":"M R Povlow, J R Davis, A M Betts, S M Clayton, F J Cloran, J K Aden, J L Ritter","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A7919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are uncommon but can be debilitating. Early diagnosis is critical. Most patients undergo CT after trauma. We sought to identify correlative CT findings of supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries to discern who may require further evaluation with MR imaging and to measure multireviewer performance for their interpretations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified all MR imaging examinations of the brachial plexus from our institution from January 2010 to January 2021 and included those performed for trauma. We excluded patients with penetrating or infraclavicular injuries and without preceding CTA of the neck or CT of the cervical spine. The cohort of 36 cases and 50 controls remained for analysis and were assessed for 6 findings: scalene muscle edema/enlargement, interscalene fat pad effacement, first rib fracture, cervical spine lateral mass/transverse process fracture, extra-axial cervical spinal hemorrhage, and cervical spinal cord eccentricity, forming a reference key. A resident physician and 2 neuroradiologists (blinded to the MR imaging) independently reviewed each CT scan for these findings. We measured agreement (Cohen κ) between observers and against the reference key.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interscalene fat pad effacement (sensitivity, specificity, 94.44%, 90.00%; OR = 130.33; <i>P </i>< .001) and scalene muscle edema/enlargement (sensitivity, specificity, 94.44%, 88.00%; OR = 153.00; <i>P </i>< .001) correlated significantly with brachial plexus injury. Agreement between observers and the key was almost perfect for those findings and fractures (pooled κ ≥ 0.84; <i>P </i>< .001). Agreement between observers was variable (κ = 0.48-0.97; <i>P </i>< .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT can accurately predict brachial plexus injuries, potentially enabling earlier definitive evaluation. High interobserver agreement suggests that findings are consistently learned and applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":7875,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"44 8","pages":"951-958"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliable Initial Trauma CT Findings of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Injury in Patients Sustaining Blunt Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"M R Povlow, J R Davis, A M Betts, S M Clayton, F J Cloran, J K Aden, J L Ritter\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A7919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are uncommon but can be debilitating. Early diagnosis is critical. Most patients undergo CT after trauma. We sought to identify correlative CT findings of supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries to discern who may require further evaluation with MR imaging and to measure multireviewer performance for their interpretations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified all MR imaging examinations of the brachial plexus from our institution from January 2010 to January 2021 and included those performed for trauma. We excluded patients with penetrating or infraclavicular injuries and without preceding CTA of the neck or CT of the cervical spine. The cohort of 36 cases and 50 controls remained for analysis and were assessed for 6 findings: scalene muscle edema/enlargement, interscalene fat pad effacement, first rib fracture, cervical spine lateral mass/transverse process fracture, extra-axial cervical spinal hemorrhage, and cervical spinal cord eccentricity, forming a reference key. A resident physician and 2 neuroradiologists (blinded to the MR imaging) independently reviewed each CT scan for these findings. We measured agreement (Cohen κ) between observers and against the reference key.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interscalene fat pad effacement (sensitivity, specificity, 94.44%, 90.00%; OR = 130.33; <i>P </i>< .001) and scalene muscle edema/enlargement (sensitivity, specificity, 94.44%, 88.00%; OR = 153.00; <i>P </i>< .001) correlated significantly with brachial plexus injury. Agreement between observers and the key was almost perfect for those findings and fractures (pooled κ ≥ 0.84; <i>P </i>< .001). Agreement between observers was variable (κ = 0.48-0.97; <i>P </i>< .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT can accurately predict brachial plexus injuries, potentially enabling earlier definitive evaluation. High interobserver agreement suggests that findings are consistently learned and applied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\"44 8\",\"pages\":\"951-958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7919\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:创伤性臂丛神经损伤并不常见,但会使人衰弱。早期诊断至关重要。大多数患者在创伤后都要接受 CT 检查。我们试图确定锁骨上臂丛神经损伤的相关 CT 结果,以分辨哪些患者可能需要通过 MR 成像进行进一步评估,并衡量多位评审员对其解释的表现:我们确定了本机构自 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间进行的所有臂丛核磁共振成像检查,其中包括因外伤而进行的检查。我们排除了穿透性损伤或锁骨下损伤的患者,也排除了之前未进行颈部CTA或颈椎CT检查的患者。我们对 36 例病例和 50 例对照组进行了分析,并评估了 6 项结果:头皮肌水肿/增大、肩胛间脂肪垫外翻、第一肋骨骨折、颈椎侧块/横突骨折、轴外颈椎出血和颈脊髓偏心,形成了一个参考关键。一名住院医师和两名神经放射科医师(对磁共振成像结果保密)针对这些结果独立审查每份 CT 扫描结果。我们测量了观察者之间的一致性(Cohen κ)以及与参考标准的一致性:腋窝间脂肪垫脱出(灵敏度、特异性分别为 94.44%、90.00%;OR = 130.33;P P P P 结论:CT 可以准确预测肱动脉瓣膜的脱出:CT 可以准确预测臂丛神经损伤,从而可以更早地进行确定性评估。观察者之间的高度一致表明,研究结果的学习和应用是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliable Initial Trauma CT Findings of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Injury in Patients Sustaining Blunt Injuries.

Background and purpose: Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are uncommon but can be debilitating. Early diagnosis is critical. Most patients undergo CT after trauma. We sought to identify correlative CT findings of supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries to discern who may require further evaluation with MR imaging and to measure multireviewer performance for their interpretations.

Materials and methods: We identified all MR imaging examinations of the brachial plexus from our institution from January 2010 to January 2021 and included those performed for trauma. We excluded patients with penetrating or infraclavicular injuries and without preceding CTA of the neck or CT of the cervical spine. The cohort of 36 cases and 50 controls remained for analysis and were assessed for 6 findings: scalene muscle edema/enlargement, interscalene fat pad effacement, first rib fracture, cervical spine lateral mass/transverse process fracture, extra-axial cervical spinal hemorrhage, and cervical spinal cord eccentricity, forming a reference key. A resident physician and 2 neuroradiologists (blinded to the MR imaging) independently reviewed each CT scan for these findings. We measured agreement (Cohen κ) between observers and against the reference key.

Results: Interscalene fat pad effacement (sensitivity, specificity, 94.44%, 90.00%; OR = 130.33; P < .001) and scalene muscle edema/enlargement (sensitivity, specificity, 94.44%, 88.00%; OR = 153.00; P < .001) correlated significantly with brachial plexus injury. Agreement between observers and the key was almost perfect for those findings and fractures (pooled κ ≥ 0.84; P < .001). Agreement between observers was variable (κ = 0.48-0.97; P < .001).

Conclusions: CT can accurately predict brachial plexus injuries, potentially enabling earlier definitive evaluation. High interobserver agreement suggests that findings are consistently learned and applied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
506
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The mission of AJNR is to further knowledge in all aspects of neuroimaging, head and neck imaging, and spine imaging for neuroradiologists, radiologists, trainees, scientists, and associated professionals through print and/or electronic publication of quality peer-reviewed articles that lead to the highest standards in patient care, research, and education and to promote discussion of these and other issues through its electronic activities.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Editorials in Radiology: Can Expert Editors Detect Them? The many faces of myxopapillary ependynomas. Vestibular schwannoma-related increased labyrinthine post-gadolinium 3D-FLAIR signal intensity and association with hearing impairment. CNS Embryonal Tumor with PLAGL Amplification, a New Tumor Type in Children and Adolescents: Insights from a Comprehensive MRI Analysis. DSA Quantitative Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Obliteration in Cerebral AVM following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1