Leonid N Maslov, Natalia V Naryzhnaya, Maria Sirotina, Alexandr V Mukhomedzyanov, Boris K Kurbatov, Alla A Boshchenko, Huijie Ma, Yi Zhang, Feng Fu, Jianming Pei, Viacheslav N Azev, Vladimir A Pereverzev
{"title":"在缺血再灌注时活性氧是保护还是损害心脏?实验及临床数据分析。","authors":"Leonid N Maslov, Natalia V Naryzhnaya, Maria Sirotina, Alexandr V Mukhomedzyanov, Boris K Kurbatov, Alla A Boshchenko, Huijie Ma, Yi Zhang, Feng Fu, Jianming Pei, Viacheslav N Azev, Vladimir A Pereverzev","doi":"10.7555/JBR.36.20220261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in ischemic and reperfusion (I/R) injury of the heart has been discussed for more than 40 years. It has been demonstrated that reperfusion triggers a multiple increase in free radical generation in the isolated heart. Antioxidants were found to have the ability to mitigate I/R injury of the heart. However, it is unclear whether their cardioprotective effect truly depends on the decrease of ROS levels in myocardial tissues. Since high doses and high concentrations of antioxidants were experimentally used, it is highly likely that the cardioprotective effect of antioxidants depends on their interaction not only with free radicals but also with other molecules. It has been demonstrated that the antioxidant N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine or NDPH oxidase knockout abolished the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Consequently, there is evidence that ROS protect the heart against the I/R injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":15061,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Research","volume":"37 4","pages":"268-280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387750/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do reactive oxygen species damage or protect the heart in ischemia and reperfusion? Analysis on experimental and clinical data.\",\"authors\":\"Leonid N Maslov, Natalia V Naryzhnaya, Maria Sirotina, Alexandr V Mukhomedzyanov, Boris K Kurbatov, Alla A Boshchenko, Huijie Ma, Yi Zhang, Feng Fu, Jianming Pei, Viacheslav N Azev, Vladimir A Pereverzev\",\"doi\":\"10.7555/JBR.36.20220261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in ischemic and reperfusion (I/R) injury of the heart has been discussed for more than 40 years. It has been demonstrated that reperfusion triggers a multiple increase in free radical generation in the isolated heart. Antioxidants were found to have the ability to mitigate I/R injury of the heart. However, it is unclear whether their cardioprotective effect truly depends on the decrease of ROS levels in myocardial tissues. Since high doses and high concentrations of antioxidants were experimentally used, it is highly likely that the cardioprotective effect of antioxidants depends on their interaction not only with free radicals but also with other molecules. It has been demonstrated that the antioxidant N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine or NDPH oxidase knockout abolished the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Consequently, there is evidence that ROS protect the heart against the I/R injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"268-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387750/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.36.20220261\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.36.20220261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do reactive oxygen species damage or protect the heart in ischemia and reperfusion? Analysis on experimental and clinical data.
The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in ischemic and reperfusion (I/R) injury of the heart has been discussed for more than 40 years. It has been demonstrated that reperfusion triggers a multiple increase in free radical generation in the isolated heart. Antioxidants were found to have the ability to mitigate I/R injury of the heart. However, it is unclear whether their cardioprotective effect truly depends on the decrease of ROS levels in myocardial tissues. Since high doses and high concentrations of antioxidants were experimentally used, it is highly likely that the cardioprotective effect of antioxidants depends on their interaction not only with free radicals but also with other molecules. It has been demonstrated that the antioxidant N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine or NDPH oxidase knockout abolished the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Consequently, there is evidence that ROS protect the heart against the I/R injury.