意大利版坎伯兰脚踝不稳定工具(CAIT-I)。

Q2 Health Professions Foot Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2023.102043
Angela Contri , Francesco Ballardin , Gianluca De Marco , Matteo Gaucci , Angela Scariato , Veronica Zanoni , Carla Vanti , Paolo Pillastrini
{"title":"意大利版坎伯兰脚踝不稳定工具(CAIT-I)。","authors":"Angela Contri ,&nbsp;Francesco Ballardin ,&nbsp;Gianluca De Marco ,&nbsp;Matteo Gaucci ,&nbsp;Angela Scariato ,&nbsp;Veronica Zanoni ,&nbsp;Carla Vanti ,&nbsp;Paolo Pillastrini","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2023.102043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Translating, culturally adapting, and validating the Italian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-I).</p></div><div><h3>Summary of background data</h3><p>Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries and can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). The International Ankle Consortium recommends the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) as a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire assessing the presence and severity of CAI. At this moment, there is no validated Italian version of CAIT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Italian version of the CAIT (CAIT-I) was developed by an expert committee. Test-retest reliability of the CAIT-I was measured in 286 healthy and injured participants within a 4–9-day period, by using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>). Construct validity, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and sensitivity were examined in a sample of 548 adults. Instrument responsiveness over 4 time points was determined in a subgroup of 37 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CAIT-I demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC≥0.92) and good internal consistency (α = .84). Construct validity was confirmed. Identified cut-off for the presence of CAI was 24.75, with sensitivity= 0.77 and specificity= 0.65. There were significant differences across time for CAIT-I scores (P &lt; .001), demonstrating responsiveness to change, but no floor or ceiling effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CAIT-I demonstrates acceptable psychometric performance as a screening and outcome measure. The CAIT-I is a useful tool to assess the presence and severity of CAI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Italian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-I)\",\"authors\":\"Angela Contri ,&nbsp;Francesco Ballardin ,&nbsp;Gianluca De Marco ,&nbsp;Matteo Gaucci ,&nbsp;Angela Scariato ,&nbsp;Veronica Zanoni ,&nbsp;Carla Vanti ,&nbsp;Paolo Pillastrini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foot.2023.102043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Translating, culturally adapting, and validating the Italian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-I).</p></div><div><h3>Summary of background data</h3><p>Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries and can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). The International Ankle Consortium recommends the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) as a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire assessing the presence and severity of CAI. At this moment, there is no validated Italian version of CAIT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Italian version of the CAIT (CAIT-I) was developed by an expert committee. Test-retest reliability of the CAIT-I was measured in 286 healthy and injured participants within a 4–9-day period, by using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>). Construct validity, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and sensitivity were examined in a sample of 548 adults. Instrument responsiveness over 4 time points was determined in a subgroup of 37 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CAIT-I demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC≥0.92) and good internal consistency (α = .84). Construct validity was confirmed. Identified cut-off for the presence of CAI was 24.75, with sensitivity= 0.77 and specificity= 0.65. There were significant differences across time for CAIT-I scores (P &lt; .001), demonstrating responsiveness to change, but no floor or ceiling effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CAIT-I demonstrates acceptable psychometric performance as a screening and outcome measure. The CAIT-I is a useful tool to assess the presence and severity of CAI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259223000846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259223000846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:评估翻译的、文化适应的问卷的心理测量特性。目的:翻译、文化适应和验证坎伯兰脚踝不稳定工具(CAIT-I)的意大利语版本。背景数据摘要:踝关节扭伤是最常见的肌肉骨骼损伤之一,可导致慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)。国际踝关节联合会推荐坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)作为一种有效可靠的自我报告问卷,评估CAI的存在和严重程度。目前,还没有经过验证的意大利版CAIT。方法:由专家委员会开发意大利版CAIT(CAIT-I)。通过使用组内相关系数(ICC2,1),在4-9天的时间内对286名健康和受伤的参与者测量了CAIT-I的测试-再测试可靠性。在548名成年人的样本中检验了结构有效性、探索性因素分析、内部一致性和敏感性。在一个由37名参与者组成的亚组中确定了4个时间点的仪器响应性。结果:CAIT-I具有良好的重测信度(ICC≥0.92)和良好的内部一致性(α=.84),结构有效性得到证实。已确定的CAI存在的临界值为24.75,敏感性=0.77,特异性=0.65。CAIT-I评分在时间上存在显著差异(P结论:CAIT-I作为筛查和结果测量显示出可接受的心理测量性能。CAIT-I是评估CAI存在和严重程度的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Italian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-I)

Study design

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.

Objective

Translating, culturally adapting, and validating the Italian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-I).

Summary of background data

Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries and can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). The International Ankle Consortium recommends the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) as a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire assessing the presence and severity of CAI. At this moment, there is no validated Italian version of CAIT.

Methods

The Italian version of the CAIT (CAIT-I) was developed by an expert committee. Test-retest reliability of the CAIT-I was measured in 286 healthy and injured participants within a 4–9-day period, by using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC2,1). Construct validity, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and sensitivity were examined in a sample of 548 adults. Instrument responsiveness over 4 time points was determined in a subgroup of 37 participants.

Results

The CAIT-I demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC≥0.92) and good internal consistency (α = .84). Construct validity was confirmed. Identified cut-off for the presence of CAI was 24.75, with sensitivity= 0.77 and specificity= 0.65. There were significant differences across time for CAIT-I scores (P < .001), demonstrating responsiveness to change, but no floor or ceiling effects.

Conclusion

The CAIT-I demonstrates acceptable psychometric performance as a screening and outcome measure. The CAIT-I is a useful tool to assess the presence and severity of CAI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of custom hard-shell 3D-printed foot orthoses in a cohort of patients who did not respond to treatment with custom ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) foot orthoses Regional changes in the free Achilles tendon volume in response to repeated submaximal contractions Mechanical drivers of intrinsic foot muscle for maximum toe flexor strength in upright standing across different body size Accuracy and reliability of the Ipswich touch test in identifying loss of protective sensation among diabetic patients Predictors of poor pre-operative patient reported outcome measures in elective foot and ankle surgery: Analysis of 1217 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1