Yujia Susanna Qiao, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Peggy M Cawthon, Steven R Cummings, Daniel E Forman, Bret H Goodpaster, Marquis Hawkins, Kyle D Moored, Barbara J Nicklas, Frederico G S Toledo, Pamela E Toto, Adam J Santanasto, Elsa S Strotmeyer, Anne B Newman, Nancy W Glynn
{"title":"匹兹堡疲劳性能指数在肌肉、运动和衰老研究中的验证。","authors":"Yujia Susanna Qiao, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Peggy M Cawthon, Steven R Cummings, Daniel E Forman, Bret H Goodpaster, Marquis Hawkins, Kyle D Moored, Barbara J Nicklas, Frederico G S Toledo, Pamela E Toto, Adam J Santanasto, Elsa S Strotmeyer, Anne B Newman, Nancy W Glynn","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index (PPFI) quantifies the percent decline in cadence using accelerometry during standardized walking tasks. Although PPFI has shown strong correlations with physical performance, the developmental sample was relatively homogenous and small, necessitating further validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (N = 805, age = 76.4 ± 5.0 years, 58% women, 85% White) wore an ActiGraph GT9X on the nondominant wrist during usual-paced 400 m walk. Tri-axial accelerations were analyzed to compute PPFI (higher score = greater fatigability). To evaluate construct and discriminant validity, Spearman correlations (rs) between PPFI and gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), chair stand speed, leg peak power, VO2peak, perceived fatigability, and mood were examined. Sex-specific PPFI cut-points that optimally discriminated gait speed using classification and regression tree were then generated. Their discriminate power in relation to aforementioned physical performance were further evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median PPFI score was 1.4% (25th-75th percentile range: 0%-21.7%), higher among women than men (p < .001). PPFI score was moderate-to-strongly correlated with gait speed (rs = -0.75), SPPB score (rs = -0.38), chair stand speed (rs = -0.36), leg peak power (rs = -0.34) and VO2peak (rs = -0.40), and less strongly with perceived fatigability (rs = 0.28-0.29), all p < .001. PPFI score was not correlated with mood (|rs| < 0.08). Sex-specific PPFI cut-points (no performance fatigability: PPFI = 0%; mild performance fatigability: 0% < PPFI < 3.5% [women], 0% < PPFI < 5.4% [men]; moderate-to-severe performance fatigability: PPFI ≥ 3.5% [women], PPFI ≥ 5.4% [men]) discriminated physical performance (all p < .001), adjusted for demographics and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work underscores the utility of PPFI as a valid measure to quantify performance fatigability in future longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical/pharmaceutical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":49953,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2387-2395"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging.\",\"authors\":\"Yujia Susanna Qiao, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Peggy M Cawthon, Steven R Cummings, Daniel E Forman, Bret H Goodpaster, Marquis Hawkins, Kyle D Moored, Barbara J Nicklas, Frederico G S Toledo, Pamela E Toto, Adam J Santanasto, Elsa S Strotmeyer, Anne B Newman, Nancy W Glynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glad197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index (PPFI) quantifies the percent decline in cadence using accelerometry during standardized walking tasks. Although PPFI has shown strong correlations with physical performance, the developmental sample was relatively homogenous and small, necessitating further validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (N = 805, age = 76.4 ± 5.0 years, 58% women, 85% White) wore an ActiGraph GT9X on the nondominant wrist during usual-paced 400 m walk. Tri-axial accelerations were analyzed to compute PPFI (higher score = greater fatigability). To evaluate construct and discriminant validity, Spearman correlations (rs) between PPFI and gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), chair stand speed, leg peak power, VO2peak, perceived fatigability, and mood were examined. Sex-specific PPFI cut-points that optimally discriminated gait speed using classification and regression tree were then generated. Their discriminate power in relation to aforementioned physical performance were further evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median PPFI score was 1.4% (25th-75th percentile range: 0%-21.7%), higher among women than men (p < .001). PPFI score was moderate-to-strongly correlated with gait speed (rs = -0.75), SPPB score (rs = -0.38), chair stand speed (rs = -0.36), leg peak power (rs = -0.34) and VO2peak (rs = -0.40), and less strongly with perceived fatigability (rs = 0.28-0.29), all p < .001. PPFI score was not correlated with mood (|rs| < 0.08). Sex-specific PPFI cut-points (no performance fatigability: PPFI = 0%; mild performance fatigability: 0% < PPFI < 3.5% [women], 0% < PPFI < 5.4% [men]; moderate-to-severe performance fatigability: PPFI ≥ 3.5% [women], PPFI ≥ 5.4% [men]) discriminated physical performance (all p < .001), adjusted for demographics and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work underscores the utility of PPFI as a valid measure to quantify performance fatigability in future longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical/pharmaceutical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2387-2395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad197\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging.
Background: The Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index (PPFI) quantifies the percent decline in cadence using accelerometry during standardized walking tasks. Although PPFI has shown strong correlations with physical performance, the developmental sample was relatively homogenous and small, necessitating further validation.
Methods: Participants from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (N = 805, age = 76.4 ± 5.0 years, 58% women, 85% White) wore an ActiGraph GT9X on the nondominant wrist during usual-paced 400 m walk. Tri-axial accelerations were analyzed to compute PPFI (higher score = greater fatigability). To evaluate construct and discriminant validity, Spearman correlations (rs) between PPFI and gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), chair stand speed, leg peak power, VO2peak, perceived fatigability, and mood were examined. Sex-specific PPFI cut-points that optimally discriminated gait speed using classification and regression tree were then generated. Their discriminate power in relation to aforementioned physical performance were further evaluated.
Results: Median PPFI score was 1.4% (25th-75th percentile range: 0%-21.7%), higher among women than men (p < .001). PPFI score was moderate-to-strongly correlated with gait speed (rs = -0.75), SPPB score (rs = -0.38), chair stand speed (rs = -0.36), leg peak power (rs = -0.34) and VO2peak (rs = -0.40), and less strongly with perceived fatigability (rs = 0.28-0.29), all p < .001. PPFI score was not correlated with mood (|rs| < 0.08). Sex-specific PPFI cut-points (no performance fatigability: PPFI = 0%; mild performance fatigability: 0% < PPFI < 3.5% [women], 0% < PPFI < 5.4% [men]; moderate-to-severe performance fatigability: PPFI ≥ 3.5% [women], PPFI ≥ 5.4% [men]) discriminated physical performance (all p < .001), adjusted for demographics and smoking status.
Conclusion: Our work underscores the utility of PPFI as a valid measure to quantify performance fatigability in future longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical/pharmaceutical trials.
期刊介绍:
Publishes articles representing the full range of medical sciences pertaining to aging. Appropriate areas include, but are not limited to, basic medical science, clinical epidemiology, clinical research, and health services research for professions such as medicine, dentistry, allied health sciences, and nursing. It publishes articles on research pertinent to human biology and disease.