抗酸口服混悬液中酵母和霉菌检测和定量的快速微生物学方法的性能等效性和验证。

Q3 Medicine PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-21 DOI:10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012632
Harold Alexis Prada Ramírez, Ángela A Beltrán-Osuna, Sandra Celeita, Juan Camilo Fonseca
{"title":"抗酸口服混悬液中酵母和霉菌检测和定量的快速微生物学方法的性能等效性和验证。","authors":"Harold Alexis Prada Ramírez,&nbsp;Ángela A Beltrán-Osuna,&nbsp;Sandra Celeita,&nbsp;Juan Camilo Fonseca","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alternative and rapid microbiological methods can be effective replacements for more traditional plating approaches for ensuring quality and safety in the pharmaceutical industry. This article compares the efficacy of the Soleris automated method and the traditional plate-count method for the quantitative detection of yeasts and molds at three different microbial bioburden levels. Validation testing was carried out using an antacid oral suspension (aluminum hydroxide 4% + magnesium hydroxide 4% + simethicone 0.4%). Equivalence of data between detection time and colony-forming units was established for both the alternative and the conventional methodologies. Using probability of detection, linear Poisson regression, Fisher's test, and multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), all results from the rapid method were shown to be in statistical agreement with the those of the reference plating procedures. The limits of detection and quantification were statistically similar for both methods (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05), showing that the alternative method is not inferior in performance to the reference method. Essential validation parameters such as precision (standard deviation <5, coefficient of variance <35%), accuracy (>70%), linearity (R2 >0.9025), ruggedness (ANOVA, P < 0.05), operative range, and specificity were determined. It was shown that all the test results obtained using the alternative method were in statistical agreement with the those of the standard plate-count method. Thus, this new technology was found to meet all the validation criteria needed to be considered as an alternative method for yeast and mold quantification in the antacid oral suspension tested. However, taking into account that the present validation was carried out utilizing A. brasiliensis and C. albicans as suitable models for yeasts and molds and with an antacid oral suspension as a pharmaceutical matrix, further investigation will be required to qualify Soleris technology for other environmental isolates and recovery of these isolates from production batches.","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":"77 4","pages":"268-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Equivalence and Validation of a Rapid Microbiological Method for Detection and Quantification of Yeast and Mold in an Antacid Oral Suspension.\",\"authors\":\"Harold Alexis Prada Ramírez,&nbsp;Ángela A Beltrán-Osuna,&nbsp;Sandra Celeita,&nbsp;Juan Camilo Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alternative and rapid microbiological methods can be effective replacements for more traditional plating approaches for ensuring quality and safety in the pharmaceutical industry. This article compares the efficacy of the Soleris automated method and the traditional plate-count method for the quantitative detection of yeasts and molds at three different microbial bioburden levels. Validation testing was carried out using an antacid oral suspension (aluminum hydroxide 4% + magnesium hydroxide 4% + simethicone 0.4%). Equivalence of data between detection time and colony-forming units was established for both the alternative and the conventional methodologies. Using probability of detection, linear Poisson regression, Fisher's test, and multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), all results from the rapid method were shown to be in statistical agreement with the those of the reference plating procedures. The limits of detection and quantification were statistically similar for both methods (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05), showing that the alternative method is not inferior in performance to the reference method. Essential validation parameters such as precision (standard deviation <5, coefficient of variance <35%), accuracy (>70%), linearity (R2 >0.9025), ruggedness (ANOVA, P < 0.05), operative range, and specificity were determined. It was shown that all the test results obtained using the alternative method were in statistical agreement with the those of the standard plate-count method. Thus, this new technology was found to meet all the validation criteria needed to be considered as an alternative method for yeast and mold quantification in the antacid oral suspension tested. However, taking into account that the present validation was carried out utilizing A. brasiliensis and C. albicans as suitable models for yeasts and molds and with an antacid oral suspension as a pharmaceutical matrix, further investigation will be required to qualify Soleris technology for other environmental isolates and recovery of these isolates from production batches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"77 4\",\"pages\":\"268-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

替代和快速的微生物方法可以有效地替代更传统的电镀方法,以确保制药行业的质量和安全。本文比较了Soleris自动化方法和传统平板计数方法在三种不同微生物生物负载水平下定量检测酵母和霉菌的效果。使用抗酸口服混悬液(氢氧化铝4%+氢氧化镁4%+西美酮0.4%)进行验证测试。对于替代方法和传统方法,建立了检测时间和菌落形成单位之间的数据等效性。使用检测概率、线性泊松回归、Fisher检验和多因素方差分析(ANOVA),快速方法的所有结果都显示出和参考电镀程序的结果在统计学上一致。两种方法的检测和定量限在统计学上相似(Fisher精确检验,P>0.05),表明替代方法的性能并不低于参考方法。确定了基本验证参数,如精密度(标准偏差70%)、线性度(R2>0.9025)、稳健性(ANOVA,P<0.05)、手术范围和特异性。结果表明,用该替代方法得到的所有试验结果和标准平板计数法的结果在统计学上是一致的。因此,发现这项新技术符合所有验证标准,可以作为抗酸口服悬浮液中酵母和霉菌定量的替代方法。然而,考虑到目前的验证是利用巴西乳杆菌和白色念珠菌作为酵母和霉菌的合适模型,并使用抗酸口服悬浮液作为药物基质进行的,需要进一步的研究来鉴定Soleris技术是否适用于其他环境分离物,并从生产批次中回收这些分离物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Equivalence and Validation of a Rapid Microbiological Method for Detection and Quantification of Yeast and Mold in an Antacid Oral Suspension.
Alternative and rapid microbiological methods can be effective replacements for more traditional plating approaches for ensuring quality and safety in the pharmaceutical industry. This article compares the efficacy of the Soleris automated method and the traditional plate-count method for the quantitative detection of yeasts and molds at three different microbial bioburden levels. Validation testing was carried out using an antacid oral suspension (aluminum hydroxide 4% + magnesium hydroxide 4% + simethicone 0.4%). Equivalence of data between detection time and colony-forming units was established for both the alternative and the conventional methodologies. Using probability of detection, linear Poisson regression, Fisher's test, and multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), all results from the rapid method were shown to be in statistical agreement with the those of the reference plating procedures. The limits of detection and quantification were statistically similar for both methods (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05), showing that the alternative method is not inferior in performance to the reference method. Essential validation parameters such as precision (standard deviation <5, coefficient of variance <35%), accuracy (>70%), linearity (R2 >0.9025), ruggedness (ANOVA, P < 0.05), operative range, and specificity were determined. It was shown that all the test results obtained using the alternative method were in statistical agreement with the those of the standard plate-count method. Thus, this new technology was found to meet all the validation criteria needed to be considered as an alternative method for yeast and mold quantification in the antacid oral suspension tested. However, taking into account that the present validation was carried out utilizing A. brasiliensis and C. albicans as suitable models for yeasts and molds and with an antacid oral suspension as a pharmaceutical matrix, further investigation will be required to qualify Soleris technology for other environmental isolates and recovery of these isolates from production batches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation. Definition of particle visibility threshold in parenteral drug products - towards standardization of visual inspection operator qualification. Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification. Comparing Container Closure Integrity Test Methods-Performance of Headspace Carbon Dioxide Analysis versus Helium Leakage Using Positive Controls. Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1