Mingying Li, Miao Liu, Ling Zhu, Hongjiang Lu, An Mao, Huihui Liu, Kun Yu, Liyun Dong
{"title":"建立一个预测模型来预测新发转移性her2低乳腺癌的生存:一项国家癌症数据库分析。","authors":"Mingying Li, Miao Liu, Ling Zhu, Hongjiang Lu, An Mao, Huihui Liu, Kun Yu, Liyun Dong","doi":"10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer with low human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) expression is increasingly considered as a distinct subtype which consists of types of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and HER2 IHC 2+/<i>in-situ</i> hybridization (ISH)-negative. We aim to assess the survival difference between HER2 IHC 1+ and HER2 IHC 2+/ISH-negative breast cancer patients with metastasis at presentation and construct a prognostic nomogram for HER2-low patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic HER2-low breast cancer from 2010 to 2015 were included and analyzed using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) method were used for survival analysis. Nomograms were built to predict survival.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 7897 patients were included in the final analysis, among which 5458 (69.1%) patients were HER2 IHC 1+ and 2439 (30.9%) were HER2 IHC 2+/ISH-negative. Although the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed difference in survival, this survival difference was lost in the multivariate Cox analysis (multivariate: HR (hazard ratio) = 0.97; 95% CI (confidence interval) [0.92-1.03]). A prognostic nomogram was successfully constructed for individually predicting the long-term survival rate of HER2-low patients, which exhibited an acceptable predictive capability in training (C index: 0.719) and validation cohort (C index: 0.706). This nomogram could easily divide patients into high and low-risk subgroups with distinct prognoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest no statistical survival differences between HER2 1+ and HER2 2+ breast cancer. Additionally, a nomogram was constructed with an acceptable capacity to individually predict the long-term outcome of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11379,"journal":{"name":"Discovery medicine","volume":"35 176","pages":"283-292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a Predictive Model to Predict Survival of de Novo Metastatic HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mingying Li, Miao Liu, Ling Zhu, Hongjiang Lu, An Mao, Huihui Liu, Kun Yu, Liyun Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer with low human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) expression is increasingly considered as a distinct subtype which consists of types of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and HER2 IHC 2+/<i>in-situ</i> hybridization (ISH)-negative. We aim to assess the survival difference between HER2 IHC 1+ and HER2 IHC 2+/ISH-negative breast cancer patients with metastasis at presentation and construct a prognostic nomogram for HER2-low patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic HER2-low breast cancer from 2010 to 2015 were included and analyzed using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) method were used for survival analysis. Nomograms were built to predict survival.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 7897 patients were included in the final analysis, among which 5458 (69.1%) patients were HER2 IHC 1+ and 2439 (30.9%) were HER2 IHC 2+/ISH-negative. Although the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed difference in survival, this survival difference was lost in the multivariate Cox analysis (multivariate: HR (hazard ratio) = 0.97; 95% CI (confidence interval) [0.92-1.03]). A prognostic nomogram was successfully constructed for individually predicting the long-term survival rate of HER2-low patients, which exhibited an acceptable predictive capability in training (C index: 0.719) and validation cohort (C index: 0.706). This nomogram could easily divide patients into high and low-risk subgroups with distinct prognoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest no statistical survival differences between HER2 1+ and HER2 2+ breast cancer. Additionally, a nomogram was constructed with an acceptable capacity to individually predict the long-term outcome of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discovery medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 176\",\"pages\":\"283-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discovery medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.29\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discovery medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.29","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Establishing a Predictive Model to Predict Survival of de Novo Metastatic HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
Background: Breast cancer with low human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) expression is increasingly considered as a distinct subtype which consists of types of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and HER2 IHC 2+/in-situ hybridization (ISH)-negative. We aim to assess the survival difference between HER2 IHC 1+ and HER2 IHC 2+/ISH-negative breast cancer patients with metastasis at presentation and construct a prognostic nomogram for HER2-low patients.
Method: Patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic HER2-low breast cancer from 2010 to 2015 were included and analyzed using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) method were used for survival analysis. Nomograms were built to predict survival.
Result: A total of 7897 patients were included in the final analysis, among which 5458 (69.1%) patients were HER2 IHC 1+ and 2439 (30.9%) were HER2 IHC 2+/ISH-negative. Although the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed difference in survival, this survival difference was lost in the multivariate Cox analysis (multivariate: HR (hazard ratio) = 0.97; 95% CI (confidence interval) [0.92-1.03]). A prognostic nomogram was successfully constructed for individually predicting the long-term survival rate of HER2-low patients, which exhibited an acceptable predictive capability in training (C index: 0.719) and validation cohort (C index: 0.706). This nomogram could easily divide patients into high and low-risk subgroups with distinct prognoses.
Conclusions: Our data suggest no statistical survival differences between HER2 1+ and HER2 2+ breast cancer. Additionally, a nomogram was constructed with an acceptable capacity to individually predict the long-term outcome of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
Discovery Medicine publishes novel, provocative ideas and research findings that challenge conventional notions about disease mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment, or any of the life sciences subjects. It publishes cutting-edge, reliable, and authoritative information in all branches of life sciences but primarily in the following areas: Novel therapies and diagnostics (approved or experimental); innovative ideas, research technologies, and translational research that will give rise to the next generation of new drugs and therapies; breakthrough understanding of mechanism of disease, biology, and physiology; and commercialization of biomedical discoveries pertaining to the development of new drugs, therapies, medical devices, and research technology.