作者对编辑来信的回应。假的联盟。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2022-0214
Hiroki Oba, Jun Takahashi, Tetsuro Ohba, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Hirotaka Haro
{"title":"作者对编辑来信的回应。假的联盟。","authors":"Hiroki Oba, Jun Takahashi, Tetsuro Ohba, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Hirotaka Haro","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2022-0214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First, we would like to thank Drs. Tsukamoto, Morimoto, Yoshihara, and Mawatari for their pertinent questions regarding our publication. We appreciate that they found value in our work and took the time to read it in detail. This study was an additional investigation using data from a multicenter, prospective, randomized study reported by Ebata et al. in 2017. The authors performed CT imaging four times: immediately postoperative and at 2, 4, and 6 months after surgery. They took the negative impact of radiation very seriously and used a low-dose protocol. We devised CT photography for decreasing radiation exposure by 50% using dose-reduction technique and iterative reconstruction method for image reconstruction. Our investigation revealed that bone fusion decisions at 2 or 4 months postoperatively had little clinical significance due to the possibility of fake union. Based on the study results, we recommended against future investigations of bone fusion being performed at those potentially misleading time points. In contrast, CT imaging immediately after surgery may be useful since bone contact immediately after surgery greatly affects subsequent bone fusion. We agree that the relationship between intravertebral bone cysts and pseudarthrosis is important, and we believe that future studies should include vertebral cysts in their evaluation. The assessment of osteoporosis in fused vertebrae using the Hounsfield unit is another interesting method. As you pointed out, the effect of teriparatide use in patients with a history of bisphosphonates cannot be ignored. In our cohort, there was one patient in the teriparatide group who had been previously treated for osteoporosis. The patient was considered to have bony fusion at 2, 4, and 6 months postoperatively, and so no fake union occurred. We also agree that a history of bisphosphonate use should be investigated to evaluate the efficacy of teriparatide. Perhaps the strongest limitation of our study was the short final evaluation period of 6 months. We have defined fake union as any event in which a vertebral body judged to have fused is later determined as not fused at the final evaluation. Moving forward, we aim to extend our observation period on the rate of fake union from 6 months to 1 or 2 years postoperatively in order to confirm our results.","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/83/2432-261X-7-0295.PMC10257955.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authors' Response to Letter to the Editor. Fake Union.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Oba, Jun Takahashi, Tetsuro Ohba, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Hirotaka Haro\",\"doi\":\"10.22603/ssrr.2022-0214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First, we would like to thank Drs. Tsukamoto, Morimoto, Yoshihara, and Mawatari for their pertinent questions regarding our publication. We appreciate that they found value in our work and took the time to read it in detail. This study was an additional investigation using data from a multicenter, prospective, randomized study reported by Ebata et al. in 2017. The authors performed CT imaging four times: immediately postoperative and at 2, 4, and 6 months after surgery. They took the negative impact of radiation very seriously and used a low-dose protocol. We devised CT photography for decreasing radiation exposure by 50% using dose-reduction technique and iterative reconstruction method for image reconstruction. Our investigation revealed that bone fusion decisions at 2 or 4 months postoperatively had little clinical significance due to the possibility of fake union. Based on the study results, we recommended against future investigations of bone fusion being performed at those potentially misleading time points. In contrast, CT imaging immediately after surgery may be useful since bone contact immediately after surgery greatly affects subsequent bone fusion. We agree that the relationship between intravertebral bone cysts and pseudarthrosis is important, and we believe that future studies should include vertebral cysts in their evaluation. The assessment of osteoporosis in fused vertebrae using the Hounsfield unit is another interesting method. As you pointed out, the effect of teriparatide use in patients with a history of bisphosphonates cannot be ignored. In our cohort, there was one patient in the teriparatide group who had been previously treated for osteoporosis. The patient was considered to have bony fusion at 2, 4, and 6 months postoperatively, and so no fake union occurred. We also agree that a history of bisphosphonate use should be investigated to evaluate the efficacy of teriparatide. Perhaps the strongest limitation of our study was the short final evaluation period of 6 months. We have defined fake union as any event in which a vertebral body judged to have fused is later determined as not fused at the final evaluation. Moving forward, we aim to extend our observation period on the rate of fake union from 6 months to 1 or 2 years postoperatively in order to confirm our results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/83/2432-261X-7-0295.PMC10257955.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Authors' Response to Letter to the Editor. Fake Union.
First, we would like to thank Drs. Tsukamoto, Morimoto, Yoshihara, and Mawatari for their pertinent questions regarding our publication. We appreciate that they found value in our work and took the time to read it in detail. This study was an additional investigation using data from a multicenter, prospective, randomized study reported by Ebata et al. in 2017. The authors performed CT imaging four times: immediately postoperative and at 2, 4, and 6 months after surgery. They took the negative impact of radiation very seriously and used a low-dose protocol. We devised CT photography for decreasing radiation exposure by 50% using dose-reduction technique and iterative reconstruction method for image reconstruction. Our investigation revealed that bone fusion decisions at 2 or 4 months postoperatively had little clinical significance due to the possibility of fake union. Based on the study results, we recommended against future investigations of bone fusion being performed at those potentially misleading time points. In contrast, CT imaging immediately after surgery may be useful since bone contact immediately after surgery greatly affects subsequent bone fusion. We agree that the relationship between intravertebral bone cysts and pseudarthrosis is important, and we believe that future studies should include vertebral cysts in their evaluation. The assessment of osteoporosis in fused vertebrae using the Hounsfield unit is another interesting method. As you pointed out, the effect of teriparatide use in patients with a history of bisphosphonates cannot be ignored. In our cohort, there was one patient in the teriparatide group who had been previously treated for osteoporosis. The patient was considered to have bony fusion at 2, 4, and 6 months postoperatively, and so no fake union occurred. We also agree that a history of bisphosphonate use should be investigated to evaluate the efficacy of teriparatide. Perhaps the strongest limitation of our study was the short final evaluation period of 6 months. We have defined fake union as any event in which a vertebral body judged to have fused is later determined as not fused at the final evaluation. Moving forward, we aim to extend our observation period on the rate of fake union from 6 months to 1 or 2 years postoperatively in order to confirm our results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor Concerning "Clinical Outcomes of Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation" by Kagami et al. Reply to "Letter to the Editor Concerning 'Clinical Outcomes of Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation' by Kagami et al." Animal Model for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Literature Review. Increase in Intraoperative Intraocular Pressure in the Prone Position. Indication and Limitation of Intradiscal Condoliase Injection for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1