弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的中枢神经系统预防:证据告诉我们什么?

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Reviews Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.blre.2023.101101
Jeffrey Lantz , Craig A. Portell , Emily C. Ayers
{"title":"弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的中枢神经系统预防:证据告诉我们什么?","authors":"Jeffrey Lantz ,&nbsp;Craig A. Portell ,&nbsp;Emily C. Ayers","doi":"10.1016/j.blre.2023.101101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Secondary involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare yet often catastrophic event for DLBCL patients. As standard first-line therapy for DLBCL with </span>rituximab<span><span><span>, cyclophosphamide, </span>doxorubicin<span><span>, vincristine<span>, and prednisone (R-CHOP) does not cross the blood-brain barrier, one approach to lessen the risk of CNS relapse has been to include additional agents, primarily </span></span>methotrexate, directed at the CNS with standard R-CHOP although the timing, dose, and mode of administration differs widely across treating physicians. This practice derives from decades of non-randomized, often retrospective data with inconsistent outcomes. The current available tools and risk models are imprecise in their ability to predict which patients are truly at risk of secondary CNS relapse and more recent, large-scale real-world analyses call into question these longstanding practices. In a field lacking any prospective, randomized studies, this review synthesizes the available data investigating the utility of CNS prophylaxis </span></span>in patients with DLBCL receiving 1st line therapy.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56139,"journal":{"name":"Blood Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central nervous system prophylaxis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: What does the evidence tell us?\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Lantz ,&nbsp;Craig A. Portell ,&nbsp;Emily C. Ayers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.blre.2023.101101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Secondary involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare yet often catastrophic event for DLBCL patients. As standard first-line therapy for DLBCL with </span>rituximab<span><span><span>, cyclophosphamide, </span>doxorubicin<span><span>, vincristine<span>, and prednisone (R-CHOP) does not cross the blood-brain barrier, one approach to lessen the risk of CNS relapse has been to include additional agents, primarily </span></span>methotrexate, directed at the CNS with standard R-CHOP although the timing, dose, and mode of administration differs widely across treating physicians. This practice derives from decades of non-randomized, often retrospective data with inconsistent outcomes. The current available tools and risk models are imprecise in their ability to predict which patients are truly at risk of secondary CNS relapse and more recent, large-scale real-world analyses call into question these longstanding practices. In a field lacking any prospective, randomized studies, this review synthesizes the available data investigating the utility of CNS prophylaxis </span></span>in patients with DLBCL receiving 1st line therapy.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000620\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)继发性累及中枢神经系统(CNS)对DLBCL患者来说是一种罕见但往往是灾难性的事件。由于利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗DLBCL的标准一线治疗不会跨越血脑屏障,降低中枢神经系统复发风险的一种方法是包括额外的药物,主要是甲氨蝶呤,用标准R-CHOP针对中枢神经系统,不同治疗医师的给药方式也有很大差异。这种做法源于几十年来非随机的、通常是回顾性的、结果不一致的数据。目前可用的工具和风险模型在预测哪些患者真正有继发性中枢神经系统复发风险方面并不精确,最近的大规模现实世界分析对这些长期做法提出了质疑。在一个缺乏任何前瞻性随机研究的领域,本综述综合了研究中枢神经系统预防在接受一线治疗的DLBCL患者中的效用的可用数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Central nervous system prophylaxis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: What does the evidence tell us?

Secondary involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare yet often catastrophic event for DLBCL patients. As standard first-line therapy for DLBCL with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) does not cross the blood-brain barrier, one approach to lessen the risk of CNS relapse has been to include additional agents, primarily methotrexate, directed at the CNS with standard R-CHOP although the timing, dose, and mode of administration differs widely across treating physicians. This practice derives from decades of non-randomized, often retrospective data with inconsistent outcomes. The current available tools and risk models are imprecise in their ability to predict which patients are truly at risk of secondary CNS relapse and more recent, large-scale real-world analyses call into question these longstanding practices. In a field lacking any prospective, randomized studies, this review synthesizes the available data investigating the utility of CNS prophylaxis in patients with DLBCL receiving 1st line therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Reviews
Blood Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
1.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Blood Reviews, a highly regarded international journal, serves as a vital information hub, offering comprehensive evaluations of clinical practices and research insights from esteemed experts. Specially commissioned, peer-reviewed articles authored by leading researchers and practitioners ensure extensive global coverage across all sub-specialties of hematology.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing in haematological cancers: A giant leap forward or sideways?"[BLOOD REVIEWS, 9 August 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2024.101226]. Clinical applications of circulating tumor DNA in hematological malignancies: From past to the future Tailoring oral anticoagulant treatment in the era of multi-drug therapies for PAH and CTEPH. Ven the dose matters: Venetoclax dosing in the frontline treatment of AML. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1