急性肺栓塞的表现和结果的性别差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Texas Heart Institute journal Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI:10.14503/THIJ-23-8113
Yu Zhang, Yu Qiu, Jinming Luo, Jian Zhang, Qingqing Yan
{"title":"急性肺栓塞的表现和结果的性别差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yu Zhang, Yu Qiu, Jinming Luo, Jian Zhang, Qingqing Yan","doi":"10.14503/THIJ-23-8113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to review differences in the presentation and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) between men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for studies comparing clinical features or outcomes of PE between men and women. Baseline comorbidities, risk factors, clinical features, and mortality rates were also compared between men and women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included. It was noted that men presented with PE at a statistically significantly younger age than women (P < .001). Smoking history (P < .001), lung disease (P = .004), malignancy (P = .02), and unprovoked PE (P = .004) were significantly more frequent among men than among women. There was no difference between the sexes for hypertension, diabetes, and a history of recent immobilization. A significantly higher proportion of men presented with chest pain (P = .02) and hemoptysis (P < .001), whereas syncope (P = .005) was more frequent in women. Compared with men, women had a higher proportion of high-risk PE (P = .003). There was no difference in the use of thrombolytic therapy or inferior vena cava filter. Neither crude nor adjusted mortality rates were significantly different between men and women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found that the age at presentation, comorbidities, and symptoms of PE differed between men and women. Limited data also suggest that women more frequently had high-risk PE compared with men, but the use of thrombolytic therapy did not differ between the 2 sexes. Importantly, both crude and adjusted data show that the mortality rate did not differ between men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":22352,"journal":{"name":"Texas Heart Institute journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-Based Differences in the Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Zhang, Yu Qiu, Jinming Luo, Jian Zhang, Qingqing Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.14503/THIJ-23-8113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to review differences in the presentation and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) between men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for studies comparing clinical features or outcomes of PE between men and women. Baseline comorbidities, risk factors, clinical features, and mortality rates were also compared between men and women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included. It was noted that men presented with PE at a statistically significantly younger age than women (P < .001). Smoking history (P < .001), lung disease (P = .004), malignancy (P = .02), and unprovoked PE (P = .004) were significantly more frequent among men than among women. There was no difference between the sexes for hypertension, diabetes, and a history of recent immobilization. A significantly higher proportion of men presented with chest pain (P = .02) and hemoptysis (P < .001), whereas syncope (P = .005) was more frequent in women. Compared with men, women had a higher proportion of high-risk PE (P = .003). There was no difference in the use of thrombolytic therapy or inferior vena cava filter. Neither crude nor adjusted mortality rates were significantly different between men and women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found that the age at presentation, comorbidities, and symptoms of PE differed between men and women. Limited data also suggest that women more frequently had high-risk PE compared with men, but the use of thrombolytic therapy did not differ between the 2 sexes. Importantly, both crude and adjusted data show that the mortality rate did not differ between men and women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Heart Institute journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Heart Institute journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Heart Institute journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:该研究旨在回顾男性和女性急性肺栓塞(PE)的表现和结局的差异。方法:检索PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science和Embase,以比较男性和女性PE的临床特征或结果。基线合并症、危险因素、临床特征和死亡率也在男性和女性之间进行了比较。结果:纳入14项研究。值得注意的是,男性出现PE的年龄明显低于女性(P < 0.001)。吸烟史(P < 0.001)、肺部疾病(P = 0.004)、恶性肿瘤(P = 0.02)和非诱发性PE (P = 0.004)在男性中的发生率明显高于女性。在高血压、糖尿病和近期固定史方面,性别之间没有差异。男性表现为胸痛(P = 0.02)和咯血(P < 0.001)的比例明显较高,而晕厥(P = 0.005)在女性中更为常见。与男性相比,女性患高危PE的比例更高(P = 0.003)。在使用溶栓治疗和下腔静脉过滤器方面没有差异。男女之间的粗死亡率和调整死亡率都没有显著差异。结论:本综述发现,PE的发病年龄、合并症和症状在男性和女性之间存在差异。有限的数据还表明,与男性相比,女性更容易发生高风险PE,但溶栓治疗的使用在两性之间没有差异。重要的是,粗数据和调整后的数据都表明,男女之间的死亡率没有差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex-Based Differences in the Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The study aimed to review differences in the presentation and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) between men and women.

Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for studies comparing clinical features or outcomes of PE between men and women. Baseline comorbidities, risk factors, clinical features, and mortality rates were also compared between men and women.

Results: Fourteen studies were included. It was noted that men presented with PE at a statistically significantly younger age than women (P < .001). Smoking history (P < .001), lung disease (P = .004), malignancy (P = .02), and unprovoked PE (P = .004) were significantly more frequent among men than among women. There was no difference between the sexes for hypertension, diabetes, and a history of recent immobilization. A significantly higher proportion of men presented with chest pain (P = .02) and hemoptysis (P < .001), whereas syncope (P = .005) was more frequent in women. Compared with men, women had a higher proportion of high-risk PE (P = .003). There was no difference in the use of thrombolytic therapy or inferior vena cava filter. Neither crude nor adjusted mortality rates were significantly different between men and women.

Conclusion: This review found that the age at presentation, comorbidities, and symptoms of PE differed between men and women. Limited data also suggest that women more frequently had high-risk PE compared with men, but the use of thrombolytic therapy did not differ between the 2 sexes. Importantly, both crude and adjusted data show that the mortality rate did not differ between men and women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Texas Heart Institute journal
Texas Heart Institute journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: For more than 45 years, the Texas Heart Institute Journal has been published by the Texas Heart Institute as part of its medical education program. Our bimonthly peer-reviewed journal enjoys a global audience of physicians, scientists, and healthcare professionals who are contributing to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The Journal was printed under the name of Cardiovascular Diseases from 1974 through 1981 (ISSN 0093-3546). The name was changed to Texas Heart Institute Journal in 1982 and was printed through 2013 (ISSN 0730-2347). In 2014, the Journal moved to online-only publication. It is indexed by Index Medicus/MEDLINE and by other indexing and abstracting services worldwide. Our full archive is available at PubMed Central. The Journal invites authors to submit these article types for review: -Clinical Investigations- Laboratory Investigations- Reviews- Techniques- Coronary Anomalies- History of Medicine- Case Reports/Case Series (Submission Fee: $70.00 USD)- Images in Cardiovascular Medicine (Submission Fee: $35.00 USD)- Guest Editorials- Peabody’s Corner- Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Fulminant Myocarditis in Patients With Autoimmune Disease That Requires Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support. Strategies for Catheter Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions and Ventricular Tachycardia With Intramural Origins. Heart Transplantation in a Patient With Rheumatic Heart Disease and Severe Left Atrial Calcification. Incidence and Impact of Takotsubo Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. Does Serum Uric Acid to Creatinine Ratio Predict Mortality Risk in Patients With Heart Failure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1