预测老年诊所护理人员的沟通。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-04 DOI:10.1177/08919887231195223
John T Martin, Jason R Anderson, Kimberly R Chapman, Natalie Kayani, Jennifer Drost, Mary Beth Spitznagel
{"title":"预测老年诊所护理人员的沟通。","authors":"John T Martin, Jason R Anderson, Kimberly R Chapman, Natalie Kayani, Jennifer Drost, Mary Beth Spitznagel","doi":"10.1177/08919887231195223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study evaluated the use of a machine learning model to determine benefit of medical record variables in predicting geriatric clinic communication requirements. Patient behavioral symptoms and global cognition, medical information, and caregiver intake assessments were extracted from 557 patient records. Two independent raters reviewed the subsequent 12 months for documented (1) incoming caregiver contacts, (2) outgoing clinic contacts, and (3) clinic communications. Random forest models' average explained variance in training sets for incoming, outgoing, and clinic communications were 7.42%, 3.65%, and 6.23%, respectively. Permutation importances revealed the strongest predictors across outcomes were patient neuropsychiatric symptoms, global cognition, and body mass, caregiver burden, and age (caregiver and patient). Average explained variance in out-of-sample test sets for incoming, outgoing, clinic communications were 6.17%, 2.78%, and 4.28%, respectively. Findings suggest patient neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, caregiver and patient age, patient body mass index, and global cognition may be useful predictors of communication requirements for patient care in a geriatric clinic. Future studies should consider additional caregiver variables, such as personality characteristics, and explore modifiable factors longitudinally.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Caregiver Communications in a Geriatric Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"John T Martin, Jason R Anderson, Kimberly R Chapman, Natalie Kayani, Jennifer Drost, Mary Beth Spitznagel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08919887231195223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study evaluated the use of a machine learning model to determine benefit of medical record variables in predicting geriatric clinic communication requirements. Patient behavioral symptoms and global cognition, medical information, and caregiver intake assessments were extracted from 557 patient records. Two independent raters reviewed the subsequent 12 months for documented (1) incoming caregiver contacts, (2) outgoing clinic contacts, and (3) clinic communications. Random forest models' average explained variance in training sets for incoming, outgoing, and clinic communications were 7.42%, 3.65%, and 6.23%, respectively. Permutation importances revealed the strongest predictors across outcomes were patient neuropsychiatric symptoms, global cognition, and body mass, caregiver burden, and age (caregiver and patient). Average explained variance in out-of-sample test sets for incoming, outgoing, clinic communications were 6.17%, 2.78%, and 4.28%, respectively. Findings suggest patient neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, caregiver and patient age, patient body mass index, and global cognition may be useful predictors of communication requirements for patient care in a geriatric clinic. Future studies should consider additional caregiver variables, such as personality characteristics, and explore modifiable factors longitudinally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"39-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231195223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231195223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究评估了机器学习模型的使用,以确定医疗记录变量在预测老年诊所沟通需求方面的益处。从557例患者记录中提取患者行为症状和整体认知、医疗信息和护理人员摄入评估。两名独立的评分员回顾了随后12个月记录的(1)新来的看护者接触,(2)离开诊所接触,以及(3)诊所沟通。随机森林模型在输入、输出和诊所通信的训练集中的平均解释方差分别为7.42%、3.65%和6.23%。排列重要性表明,患者神经精神症状、整体认知、体重、照顾者负担和年龄(照顾者和患者)是预后最强的预测因子。传入,传出,诊所通信的样本外测试集的平均解释方差分别为6.17%,2.78%和4.28%。研究结果表明,患者神经精神症状、照顾者负担、照顾者和患者年龄、患者体重指数和整体认知可能是老年门诊患者护理沟通需求的有用预测因素。未来的研究应考虑额外的照顾者变量,如人格特征,并纵向探索可修改的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Caregiver Communications in a Geriatric Clinic.

The current study evaluated the use of a machine learning model to determine benefit of medical record variables in predicting geriatric clinic communication requirements. Patient behavioral symptoms and global cognition, medical information, and caregiver intake assessments were extracted from 557 patient records. Two independent raters reviewed the subsequent 12 months for documented (1) incoming caregiver contacts, (2) outgoing clinic contacts, and (3) clinic communications. Random forest models' average explained variance in training sets for incoming, outgoing, and clinic communications were 7.42%, 3.65%, and 6.23%, respectively. Permutation importances revealed the strongest predictors across outcomes were patient neuropsychiatric symptoms, global cognition, and body mass, caregiver burden, and age (caregiver and patient). Average explained variance in out-of-sample test sets for incoming, outgoing, clinic communications were 6.17%, 2.78%, and 4.28%, respectively. Findings suggest patient neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, caregiver and patient age, patient body mass index, and global cognition may be useful predictors of communication requirements for patient care in a geriatric clinic. Future studies should consider additional caregiver variables, such as personality characteristics, and explore modifiable factors longitudinally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
期刊最新文献
Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker of Global Cognition in Individuals With Possible Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neuropsychiatric Comorbidities and Psychotropic Medication Use in Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia by Sex and Race. Greater Apathy Associated With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use in Parkinson's Disease. Clinical Staging for Personality Disorders in Older Adults. A Comparison of Test-Retest Reliability and Practice Effects of Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients with Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1