替诺福韦联合多卢替拉韦作为HIV感染患者的转换策略:一项试点随机对照试验。

Golbarg Alavian, Ladan Abbasian, Hossein Khalili, Seyed Ahmad Seyed Alinaghi, Malihe Hasannezhad, Masoumeh Farrokh Ashtiani, Seyed Ali Dehghan Manshadi
{"title":"替诺福韦联合多卢替拉韦作为HIV感染患者的转换策略:一项试点随机对照试验。","authors":"Golbarg Alavian, Ladan Abbasian, Hossein Khalili, Seyed Ahmad Seyed Alinaghi, Malihe Hasannezhad, Masoumeh Farrokh Ashtiani, Seyed Ali Dehghan Manshadi","doi":"10.1007/s40199-023-00470-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, two-drug antiretroviral regimens are emerging fields in life-long treatment in people living with HIV.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This randomized non-inferiority open-label controlled trial was designed to compare the 48-week efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir versus the standard triple therapy in virologically suppressed people living with HIV. To the best of our knowledge this combination has not been studied before.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in treatment-experienced people with HIV who had HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL for at least two years. Patients received either tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir combination (26 patients) or a standard three-drug regimen (29 patients). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL during 48 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were CD4 cell count changes, the adherence rate, and adverse drug reactions, all over 48 weeks of study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIV viral load remained undetectable (HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL) during the 48 weeks of the study in both arms. The absolute CD4 cell count change was not significant between the two groups. The overall proportion of adverse effects in each group was comparable. The rate of adherence to treatment was acceptable in both groups, and no significant difference was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment simplification with tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir regimen as maintenance therapy was non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety compared to the standard triple therapy. Comparing efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10961,"journal":{"name":"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in HIV-infected patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Golbarg Alavian, Ladan Abbasian, Hossein Khalili, Seyed Ahmad Seyed Alinaghi, Malihe Hasannezhad, Masoumeh Farrokh Ashtiani, Seyed Ali Dehghan Manshadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40199-023-00470-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, two-drug antiretroviral regimens are emerging fields in life-long treatment in people living with HIV.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This randomized non-inferiority open-label controlled trial was designed to compare the 48-week efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir versus the standard triple therapy in virologically suppressed people living with HIV. To the best of our knowledge this combination has not been studied before.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in treatment-experienced people with HIV who had HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL for at least two years. Patients received either tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir combination (26 patients) or a standard three-drug regimen (29 patients). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL during 48 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were CD4 cell count changes, the adherence rate, and adverse drug reactions, all over 48 weeks of study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIV viral load remained undetectable (HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL) during the 48 weeks of the study in both arms. The absolute CD4 cell count change was not significant between the two groups. The overall proportion of adverse effects in each group was comparable. The rate of adherence to treatment was acceptable in both groups, and no significant difference was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment simplification with tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir regimen as maintenance therapy was non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety compared to the standard triple therapy. Comparing efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"145-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624796/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-023-00470-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-023-00470-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,两种药物抗逆转录病毒疗法是HIV感染者终身治疗的新兴领域。目的:这项随机非劣效开放标签对照试验旨在比较替诺福韦-阿拉芬酰胺联合多卢替拉韦与标准三联疗法在病毒抑制的HIV感染者中48周的疗效和安全性。据我们所知,这种组合以前从未被研究过。方法:这项开放标签随机对照试验是在有治疗经验的HIV感染者中进行的,这些人患有HIV-RNA 结果:HIV病毒载量仍然无法检测(HIV-RNA 结论:与标准三联疗法相比,以替诺福韦-阿拉芬酰胺联合多卢替拉韦方案作为维持治疗的简化治疗在疗效和安全性方面并不差。比较抗逆转录病毒疗法的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in HIV-infected patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Background: Currently, two-drug antiretroviral regimens are emerging fields in life-long treatment in people living with HIV.

Objectives: This randomized non-inferiority open-label controlled trial was designed to compare the 48-week efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir versus the standard triple therapy in virologically suppressed people living with HIV. To the best of our knowledge this combination has not been studied before.

Methods: This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in treatment-experienced people with HIV who had HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL for at least two years. Patients received either tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir combination (26 patients) or a standard three-drug regimen (29 patients). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL during 48 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were CD4 cell count changes, the adherence rate, and adverse drug reactions, all over 48 weeks of study.

Results: HIV viral load remained undetectable (HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL) during the 48 weeks of the study in both arms. The absolute CD4 cell count change was not significant between the two groups. The overall proportion of adverse effects in each group was comparable. The rate of adherence to treatment was acceptable in both groups, and no significant difference was observed.

Conclusions: Treatment simplification with tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir regimen as maintenance therapy was non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety compared to the standard triple therapy. Comparing efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Flavonoid as possible therapeutic targets against COVID-19: a scoping review of in silico studies. A rare case of phenobarbital-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Deciphering the similarities and disparities of molecular mechanisms behind respiratory epithelium response to HCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 and drug repurposing, a systems biology approach. Simulation of drug-drug interactions between breast cancer chemotherapeutic agents and antiemetic drugs. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to highlight an over-looked drug-drug interaction leading to imatinib treatment failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1