高级口服小分子治疗炎症性肠病的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Crohns & Colitis Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad100
Virginia Solitano, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, John K MacDonald, Alexa Zayadi, Claire E Parker, Neeraj Narula, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Brian G Feagan, Siddharth Singh, Christopher Ma, Vipul Jairath
{"title":"高级口服小分子治疗炎症性肠病的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Virginia Solitano, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, John K MacDonald, Alexa Zayadi, Claire E Parker, Neeraj Narula, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Brian G Feagan, Siddharth Singh, Christopher Ma, Vipul Jairath","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Oral small-molecule drugs [SMDs] are expanding the therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor [JAKi] and sphingosine-1-phosphate [S1P] receptor modulator treatments for ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 30, 2022. Randomized controlled trials [RCTs] of JAKi and S1P receptor modulators in adults with UC or CD were eligible. Clinical, endoscopic, histological, and safety data were pooled and analysed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five RCTs [26 UC, nine CD] were included. In UC, JAKi therapy was associated with induction of clinical (risk ratio [RR] 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-4.92; I2 = 65%) and endoscopic [RR 3.99, 95% CI 2.36-6.75; I2 = 36%] remission compared to placebo. Upadacitinib was associated with histological response [RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.97-3.53]. S1P modulator therapy was associated with induction of clinical [RR 2.52, 95% CI 1.88-3.39; I2 = 1%] and endoscopic [RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.07-5.33; I2 = 0%] remission relative to placebo. Ozanimod was superior to placebo for inducing histological remission in UC [RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.43-3.37; I2 = 0%], while etrasimod was not [RR 2.36, 95% CI 0.71-7.88; I2 = 0%]. In CD, JAKi therapy was superior to placebo for induction of clinical remission [RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.19-1.98; I2 = 31%], and endoscopic remission [RR 4.78, 95% CI 1.63-14.06; I2 = 43%] compared to placebo. The risk of serious infections was similar for oral SMDs and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>JAKi and S1P receptor modulator therapies are effective in IBD for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission and, in some circumstances, histological response.</p>","PeriodicalId":15547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","volume":" ","pages":"1800-1816"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Oral Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Virginia Solitano, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, John K MacDonald, Alexa Zayadi, Claire E Parker, Neeraj Narula, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Brian G Feagan, Siddharth Singh, Christopher Ma, Vipul Jairath\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Oral small-molecule drugs [SMDs] are expanding the therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor [JAKi] and sphingosine-1-phosphate [S1P] receptor modulator treatments for ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 30, 2022. Randomized controlled trials [RCTs] of JAKi and S1P receptor modulators in adults with UC or CD were eligible. Clinical, endoscopic, histological, and safety data were pooled and analysed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five RCTs [26 UC, nine CD] were included. In UC, JAKi therapy was associated with induction of clinical (risk ratio [RR] 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-4.92; I2 = 65%) and endoscopic [RR 3.99, 95% CI 2.36-6.75; I2 = 36%] remission compared to placebo. Upadacitinib was associated with histological response [RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.97-3.53]. S1P modulator therapy was associated with induction of clinical [RR 2.52, 95% CI 1.88-3.39; I2 = 1%] and endoscopic [RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.07-5.33; I2 = 0%] remission relative to placebo. Ozanimod was superior to placebo for inducing histological remission in UC [RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.43-3.37; I2 = 0%], while etrasimod was not [RR 2.36, 95% CI 0.71-7.88; I2 = 0%]. In CD, JAKi therapy was superior to placebo for induction of clinical remission [RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.19-1.98; I2 = 31%], and endoscopic remission [RR 4.78, 95% CI 1.63-14.06; I2 = 43%] compared to placebo. The risk of serious infections was similar for oral SMDs and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>JAKi and S1P receptor modulator therapies are effective in IBD for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission and, in some circumstances, histological response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohns & Colitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1800-1816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohns & Colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad100\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景和目的:口服小分子药物(SMDs)正在扩大炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗领域。本系统综述和荟萃分析总结了JAK抑制剂[JAKi]和鞘氨醇-1-磷酸[S1P]受体调节剂治疗溃疡性结肠炎[UC]和克罗恩病[CD]的疗效和安全性。方法:检索自成立至2022年5月30日的MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库。JAKi和S1P受体调节剂用于UC或CD成人的随机对照试验(rct)符合条件。临床、内窥镜、组织学和安全性数据汇总并使用随机效应模型进行分析。结果:纳入35项rct [26 UC, 9 CD]。在UC中,JAKi治疗与临床诱导相关(风险比[RR] 3.16, 95%可信区间[CI] 2.03-4.92;I2 = 65%)和内窥镜[RR 3.99, 95% CI 2.36-6.75;I2 = 36%]与安慰剂相比缓解。Upadacitinib与组织学反应相关[RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.97-3.53]。S1P调节剂治疗与临床诱导相关[RR 2.52, 95% CI 1.88-3.39;I2 = 1%]和内镜[RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.07-5.33;I2 = 0%]相对于安慰剂缓解。Ozanimod在UC诱导组织学缓解方面优于安慰剂[RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.43-3.37;I2 = 0%],而etrasimod没有[RR 2.36, 95% CI 0.71-7.88;i2 = 0%]。在CD中,JAKi治疗在诱导临床缓解方面优于安慰剂[RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.19-1.98;I2 = 31%],内窥镜缓解[RR 4.78, 95% CI 1.63-14.06;I2 = 43%]与安慰剂相比。严重感染的风险与口服smd和安慰剂相似。结论:JAKi和S1P受体调节剂治疗IBD可有效诱导临床和内镜缓解,在某些情况下可诱导组织学反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Oral Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and aims: Oral small-molecule drugs [SMDs] are expanding the therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor [JAKi] and sphingosine-1-phosphate [S1P] receptor modulator treatments for ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD].

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 30, 2022. Randomized controlled trials [RCTs] of JAKi and S1P receptor modulators in adults with UC or CD were eligible. Clinical, endoscopic, histological, and safety data were pooled and analysed using a random-effects model.

Results: Thirty-five RCTs [26 UC, nine CD] were included. In UC, JAKi therapy was associated with induction of clinical (risk ratio [RR] 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-4.92; I2 = 65%) and endoscopic [RR 3.99, 95% CI 2.36-6.75; I2 = 36%] remission compared to placebo. Upadacitinib was associated with histological response [RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.97-3.53]. S1P modulator therapy was associated with induction of clinical [RR 2.52, 95% CI 1.88-3.39; I2 = 1%] and endoscopic [RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.07-5.33; I2 = 0%] remission relative to placebo. Ozanimod was superior to placebo for inducing histological remission in UC [RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.43-3.37; I2 = 0%], while etrasimod was not [RR 2.36, 95% CI 0.71-7.88; I2 = 0%]. In CD, JAKi therapy was superior to placebo for induction of clinical remission [RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.19-1.98; I2 = 31%], and endoscopic remission [RR 4.78, 95% CI 1.63-14.06; I2 = 43%] compared to placebo. The risk of serious infections was similar for oral SMDs and placebo.

Conclusion: JAKi and S1P receptor modulator therapies are effective in IBD for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission and, in some circumstances, histological response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Crohns & Colitis
Journal of Crohns & Colitis 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1048
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Crohns and Colitis is concerned with the dissemination of knowledge on clinical, basic science and innovative methods related to inflammatory bowel diseases. The journal publishes original articles, review papers, editorials, leading articles, viewpoints, case reports, innovative methods and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Peripheral Blood DNA Methylation Signatures and Response to Tofacitinib in Moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis. Whole Blood DNA Methylation Changes Are Associated with Anti-TNF Drug Concentration in Patients with Crohn's Disease. 6-Mercaptopurine in ulcerative colitis: the potential of upfront dosing with allopurinol. Mitigating the Risk of Tofacitinib-induced Adverse Events in the Elderly Population with Ulcerative Colitis. Temporary Faecal Diversion for Refractory Perianal and/or Distal Colonic Crohn's Disease in the Biologic Era: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1