西部黑腿蜱和脊椎动物种群在一场破坏性野火后的恢复。

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Vector Ecology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.52707/1081-1710-48.1.19
Emily L Pascoe, Charles E Vaughn, Michael I Jones, Reginald H Barrett, Janet E Foley, Robert S Lane
{"title":"西部黑腿蜱和脊椎动物种群在一场破坏性野火后的恢复。","authors":"Emily L Pascoe,&nbsp;Charles E Vaughn,&nbsp;Michael I Jones,&nbsp;Reginald H Barrett,&nbsp;Janet E Foley,&nbsp;Robert S Lane","doi":"10.52707/1081-1710-48.1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite increasing severity and frequency of wildfires, knowledge about how fire impacts the ecology of tick-borne pathogens is limited. In 2018, the River Fire burned a forest in the far-western U.S.A. where the ecology of tick-borne pathogens had been studied for decades. Forest structure, avifauna, large and small mammals, lizards, ticks, and tick-borne pathogens (<i>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</i>, <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>, <i>Borrelia miyamotoi</i>) were assessed after the wildfire in 2019 and 2020. Burning reduced canopy cover and eliminated the layer of thick leaf litter that hosted free-living ticks, which over time was replaced by forbs and grasses. Tick abundance and the vertebrate host community changed dramatically. Avian species adapted to cavity nesting became most prevalent, while the number of foliage-foraging species increased by 83% as vegetation regenerated. Nine mammalian species were observed on camera traps, including sentinel (black-tailed jackrabbits) and reservoir hosts (western gray squirrels) of <i>B. burgdorferi.</i> One <i>Peromyscus</i> sp. mouse was captured in 2019 but by 2020, numbers were rebounding (n=37), although tick infestations on rodents remained sparse (0.2/rodent). However, western fence lizards (n=19) hosted 8.6 ticks on average in 2020. Assays for pathogens found no <i>B. miyamotoi</i> in either questing or host-feeding ticks, <i>A. phagocytophilum</i> DNA in 4% (1/23) in 2019, and 17% (29/173) in 2020 for questing and host-feeding ticks combined, and <i>B. burgdorferi</i> DNA in just 1% of all ticks collected in 2020 (2/173). We conclude that a moderately severe wildfire can have dramatic impacts on the ecology of tick-borne pathogens, with changes posited to continue for multiple years.</p>","PeriodicalId":49961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vector Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery of western black-legged tick and vertebrate populations after a destructive wildfire in an intensively-studied woodland in northern California.\",\"authors\":\"Emily L Pascoe,&nbsp;Charles E Vaughn,&nbsp;Michael I Jones,&nbsp;Reginald H Barrett,&nbsp;Janet E Foley,&nbsp;Robert S Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.52707/1081-1710-48.1.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite increasing severity and frequency of wildfires, knowledge about how fire impacts the ecology of tick-borne pathogens is limited. In 2018, the River Fire burned a forest in the far-western U.S.A. where the ecology of tick-borne pathogens had been studied for decades. Forest structure, avifauna, large and small mammals, lizards, ticks, and tick-borne pathogens (<i>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</i>, <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>, <i>Borrelia miyamotoi</i>) were assessed after the wildfire in 2019 and 2020. Burning reduced canopy cover and eliminated the layer of thick leaf litter that hosted free-living ticks, which over time was replaced by forbs and grasses. Tick abundance and the vertebrate host community changed dramatically. Avian species adapted to cavity nesting became most prevalent, while the number of foliage-foraging species increased by 83% as vegetation regenerated. Nine mammalian species were observed on camera traps, including sentinel (black-tailed jackrabbits) and reservoir hosts (western gray squirrels) of <i>B. burgdorferi.</i> One <i>Peromyscus</i> sp. mouse was captured in 2019 but by 2020, numbers were rebounding (n=37), although tick infestations on rodents remained sparse (0.2/rodent). However, western fence lizards (n=19) hosted 8.6 ticks on average in 2020. Assays for pathogens found no <i>B. miyamotoi</i> in either questing or host-feeding ticks, <i>A. phagocytophilum</i> DNA in 4% (1/23) in 2019, and 17% (29/173) in 2020 for questing and host-feeding ticks combined, and <i>B. burgdorferi</i> DNA in just 1% of all ticks collected in 2020 (2/173). We conclude that a moderately severe wildfire can have dramatic impacts on the ecology of tick-borne pathogens, with changes posited to continue for multiple years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vector Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vector Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52707/1081-1710-48.1.19\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vector Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52707/1081-1710-48.1.19","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管野火的严重程度和频率越来越高,但关于火灾如何影响蜱传病原体生态的知识有限。2018年,“河火”烧毁了美国西部偏远地区的一片森林,在那里,人们对蜱传病原体的生态学进行了数十年的研究。2019年和2020年野火后,对森林结构、鸟类、大型和小型哺乳动物、蜥蜴、蜱虫和蜱传病原体(嗜吞噬细胞无形体、伯氏疏螺旋体、宫本疏螺旋体)进行了评估。燃烧减少了树冠的覆盖,消除了一层厚厚的落叶,这些落叶是自由生活的蜱虫的宿主,随着时间的推移,它们被牧草和草所取代。蜱虫数量和脊椎动物宿主群落发生了巨大变化。适应腔巢筑巢的鸟类最为普遍,而随着植被的更新,以树叶为食的鸟类数量增加了83%。采用相机诱捕法对伯氏疏螺旋体的哨兵(黑尾大野兔)和宿主(西部灰松鼠)等9种哺乳动物进行了观察。2019年捕获了一只Peromyscus sp.老鼠,但到2020年,数量开始反弹(n=37),尽管啮齿动物身上的蜱虫侵扰仍然很少(0.2/啮齿动物)。然而,西部栅栏蜥蜴(n=19)在2020年平均携带8.6个蜱虫。病原体检测结果显示,在寻找蜱和取食宿主的蜱中均未发现宫本氏蜱,在2019年和2020年分别为4%(1/23)和17%(29/173),而在2020年收集的所有蜱中,只有1%(2/173)存在伯氏疏螺旋体DNA。我们得出的结论是,中度严重的野火可以对蜱传病原体的生态产生巨大影响,这种变化可能会持续多年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recovery of western black-legged tick and vertebrate populations after a destructive wildfire in an intensively-studied woodland in northern California.

Despite increasing severity and frequency of wildfires, knowledge about how fire impacts the ecology of tick-borne pathogens is limited. In 2018, the River Fire burned a forest in the far-western U.S.A. where the ecology of tick-borne pathogens had been studied for decades. Forest structure, avifauna, large and small mammals, lizards, ticks, and tick-borne pathogens (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Borrelia miyamotoi) were assessed after the wildfire in 2019 and 2020. Burning reduced canopy cover and eliminated the layer of thick leaf litter that hosted free-living ticks, which over time was replaced by forbs and grasses. Tick abundance and the vertebrate host community changed dramatically. Avian species adapted to cavity nesting became most prevalent, while the number of foliage-foraging species increased by 83% as vegetation regenerated. Nine mammalian species were observed on camera traps, including sentinel (black-tailed jackrabbits) and reservoir hosts (western gray squirrels) of B. burgdorferi. One Peromyscus sp. mouse was captured in 2019 but by 2020, numbers were rebounding (n=37), although tick infestations on rodents remained sparse (0.2/rodent). However, western fence lizards (n=19) hosted 8.6 ticks on average in 2020. Assays for pathogens found no B. miyamotoi in either questing or host-feeding ticks, A. phagocytophilum DNA in 4% (1/23) in 2019, and 17% (29/173) in 2020 for questing and host-feeding ticks combined, and B. burgdorferi DNA in just 1% of all ticks collected in 2020 (2/173). We conclude that a moderately severe wildfire can have dramatic impacts on the ecology of tick-borne pathogens, with changes posited to continue for multiple years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vector Ecology
Journal of Vector Ecology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vector Ecology is an international journal published by the Society for Vector Ecology. It is concerned with all aspects of the biology, ecology, and control of arthropod and vertebrate vectors and the interrelationships between the vectors and the agents of disease that they transmit. The journal publishes original research articles and scientific notes, as well as comprehensive reviews of vector biology based on presentations at Society meetings. All papers are reviewed by at least two qualified scientists who recommend their suitability for publication. Acceptance of manuscripts is based on their scientific merit and is the final decision of the editor, but these decisions may be appealed to the editorial board. The journal began publishing in 1974 and now publishes on-line only.
期刊最新文献
DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis of the vector Culex gelidus and its global and public health significance Fine-scale associations between land cover composition and the oviposition activity of native and invasive Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) vectors of La Crosse virus Analysis of diversity and an updated catalog of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Capivari-Monos Environmental Protection Area, São Paulo, Brazil Entomological aspects of leishmaniasis transmission in the urban area of Teófilo Otoni, a municipality endemic for the disease in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais Vaporous essential oil isolates enhance LLIN efficacy for pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1