吸入前列环素治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Heather Torbic, Aftabh Saini, Mary Pat Harnegie, Divyajot Sadana, Abhijit Duggal
{"title":"吸入前列环素治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Heather Torbic,&nbsp;Aftabh Saini,&nbsp;Mary Pat Harnegie,&nbsp;Divyajot Sadana,&nbsp;Abhijit Duggal","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies evaluating inhaled prostacyclins for the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have produced inconsistent results regarding their effect on oxygenation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the change in the Pao<sub>2</sub>/Fio<sub>2</sub> ratio after administration of an inhaled prostacyclin in patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included abstracts and trials evaluating administration of inhaled prostacyclins in patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Change in the Pao<sub>2</sub>/Fio<sub>2</sub> ratio, Pao<sub>2</sub>, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) were extracted from included studies. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We included 23 studies (1,658 patients) from 6,339 abstracts identified by our search strategy. The use of inhaled prostacyclins improved oxygenation by increasing the Pao<sub>2</sub>/Fio<sub>2</sub> ratio from baseline (mean difference [MD], 40.35; 95% CI, 26.14-54.56; <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95%; very low quality evidence). Of the eight studies to evaluate change in Pao<sub>2</sub>, inhaled prostacyclins also increased Pao<sub>2</sub> from baseline (MD, 12.68; 95% CI, 2.89-22.48 mm Hg; <i>p</i> = 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 96%; very low quality evidence). Only three studies evaluated change in mPAP, but inhaled prostacyclins were found to improve mPAP from baseline (MD, -3.67; 95% CI, -5.04 to -2.31 mm Hg; <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 68%; very low quality evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with ARDS, use of inhaled prostacyclins improves oxygenation and reduces pulmonary artery pressures. Overall data are limited and there was high risk of bias and heterogeneity among included studies. Future studies evaluating inhaled prostacyclins for ARDS should evaluate their role in ARDS subphenotypes, including cardiopulmonary ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0931"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/96/cc9-5-e0931.PMC10256381.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhaled Prostacyclins for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Torbic,&nbsp;Aftabh Saini,&nbsp;Mary Pat Harnegie,&nbsp;Divyajot Sadana,&nbsp;Abhijit Duggal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies evaluating inhaled prostacyclins for the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have produced inconsistent results regarding their effect on oxygenation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the change in the Pao<sub>2</sub>/Fio<sub>2</sub> ratio after administration of an inhaled prostacyclin in patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included abstracts and trials evaluating administration of inhaled prostacyclins in patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Change in the Pao<sub>2</sub>/Fio<sub>2</sub> ratio, Pao<sub>2</sub>, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) were extracted from included studies. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We included 23 studies (1,658 patients) from 6,339 abstracts identified by our search strategy. The use of inhaled prostacyclins improved oxygenation by increasing the Pao<sub>2</sub>/Fio<sub>2</sub> ratio from baseline (mean difference [MD], 40.35; 95% CI, 26.14-54.56; <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95%; very low quality evidence). Of the eight studies to evaluate change in Pao<sub>2</sub>, inhaled prostacyclins also increased Pao<sub>2</sub> from baseline (MD, 12.68; 95% CI, 2.89-22.48 mm Hg; <i>p</i> = 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 96%; very low quality evidence). Only three studies evaluated change in mPAP, but inhaled prostacyclins were found to improve mPAP from baseline (MD, -3.67; 95% CI, -5.04 to -2.31 mm Hg; <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 68%; very low quality evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with ARDS, use of inhaled prostacyclins improves oxygenation and reduces pulmonary artery pressures. Overall data are limited and there was high risk of bias and heterogeneity among included studies. Future studies evaluating inhaled prostacyclins for ARDS should evaluate their role in ARDS subphenotypes, including cardiopulmonary ARDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"e0931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/96/cc9-5-e0931.PMC10256381.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估吸入前列环素治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的研究在其对氧合的影响方面产生了不一致的结果。本系统综述和meta分析的目的是评估ARDS患者吸入前列环素后Pao2/Fio2比值的变化。数据来源:我们检索了Ovid Medline, Embase,护理和联合健康文献累积索引,Cochrane, Scopus和Web of Science。研究选择:我们纳入了评估吸入前列环素在ARDS患者中的应用的摘要和试验。资料提取:从纳入的研究中提取Pao2/Fio2比值、Pao2和平均肺动脉压(mPAP)的变化。证据确定性和偏倚风险采用分级推荐评估、发展和评价和Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估。数据综合:我们从6339篇摘要中纳入了23项研究(1658名患者)。吸入前列环素通过提高Pao2/Fio2比来改善氧合(平均差[MD], 40.35;95% ci, 26.14-54.56;P < 0.00001;I2 = 95%;非常低质量的证据)。在8项评估Pao2变化的研究中,吸入前列环素也使Pao2较基线升高(MD, 12.68;95% CI, 2.89-22.48 mm Hg;P = 0.01;I2 = 96%;非常低质量的证据)。只有3项研究评估了mPAP的变化,但发现吸入前列环素可以从基线改善mPAP (MD, -3.67;95% CI, -5.04 ~ -2.31 mm Hg;P < 0.00001;I2 = 68%;非常低质量的证据)。结论:在ARDS患者中,吸入前列环素可改善氧合并降低肺动脉压。总体数据有限,纳入的研究存在较高的偏倚和异质性风险。未来评估吸入前列环素治疗ARDS的研究应评估其在ARDS亚表型中的作用,包括心肺ARDS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inhaled Prostacyclins for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Studies evaluating inhaled prostacyclins for the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have produced inconsistent results regarding their effect on oxygenation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the change in the Pao2/Fio2 ratio after administration of an inhaled prostacyclin in patients with ARDS.

Data sources: We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science.

Study selection: We included abstracts and trials evaluating administration of inhaled prostacyclins in patients with ARDS.

Data extraction: Change in the Pao2/Fio2 ratio, Pao2, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) were extracted from included studies. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Data synthesis: We included 23 studies (1,658 patients) from 6,339 abstracts identified by our search strategy. The use of inhaled prostacyclins improved oxygenation by increasing the Pao2/Fio2 ratio from baseline (mean difference [MD], 40.35; 95% CI, 26.14-54.56; p < 0.00001; I2 = 95%; very low quality evidence). Of the eight studies to evaluate change in Pao2, inhaled prostacyclins also increased Pao2 from baseline (MD, 12.68; 95% CI, 2.89-22.48 mm Hg; p = 0.01; I2 = 96%; very low quality evidence). Only three studies evaluated change in mPAP, but inhaled prostacyclins were found to improve mPAP from baseline (MD, -3.67; 95% CI, -5.04 to -2.31 mm Hg; p < 0.00001; I2 = 68%; very low quality evidence).

Conclusions: In patients with ARDS, use of inhaled prostacyclins improves oxygenation and reduces pulmonary artery pressures. Overall data are limited and there was high risk of bias and heterogeneity among included studies. Future studies evaluating inhaled prostacyclins for ARDS should evaluate their role in ARDS subphenotypes, including cardiopulmonary ARDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1