基于血清的生物标志物在实际生活中预测慢性乙型肝炎患者纤维化的性能。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Minerva gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-13 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5985.23.03347-8
Fadi Abu Baker, Randa Taher Natour, Yael Kopelman, Abdel H Alkilani, Saif Abu Mouch
{"title":"基于血清的生物标志物在实际生活中预测慢性乙型肝炎患者纤维化的性能。","authors":"Fadi Abu Baker, Randa Taher Natour, Yael Kopelman, Abdel H Alkilani, Saif Abu Mouch","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.23.03347-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have addressed the performance and diagnostic accuracy of laboratory-based markers for fibrosis prediction in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients yielding heterogeneous results. We aimed to study the performance of the FIB-4 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) markers for the differentiation between significant and non-significant hepatic fibrosis in real-life practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively recruited CHB patients attending the hepatology clinic to undergo shear wave elastography (SWE) and blood tests. The predictive accuracy of FIB-4 and NLR for liver fibrosis was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 174 fully characterized CHB patients with an average age of 50.2±11.2 (29-86 years) and a male predominance (65.2%) were included. Of these, 23% had significant fibrosis (≥F2) per SWE (>7.1KPA). A significant and linear correlation was found between the SWE score and FIB-4 values (r=0.572; P<0.001). A lower cut-off of 1.43 has yielded an AUROC of 0.76, with a sensitivity of 68.8%, specificity of 79.8%, diagnostic accuracy of 78.5%, and NPV of 96%. On the contrary, NLR values were similar between significant and minimal fibrosis and were not found to be correlated with significant fibrosis (r=0.54, P=0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIB4 has a moderate performance and may have a valuable role in excluding significant fibrosis in CHB patients in daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18653,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"299-305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of serum-based biomarkers in fibrosis prediction of chronic hepatitis B patients in real life practice.\",\"authors\":\"Fadi Abu Baker, Randa Taher Natour, Yael Kopelman, Abdel H Alkilani, Saif Abu Mouch\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5985.23.03347-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have addressed the performance and diagnostic accuracy of laboratory-based markers for fibrosis prediction in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients yielding heterogeneous results. We aimed to study the performance of the FIB-4 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) markers for the differentiation between significant and non-significant hepatic fibrosis in real-life practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively recruited CHB patients attending the hepatology clinic to undergo shear wave elastography (SWE) and blood tests. The predictive accuracy of FIB-4 and NLR for liver fibrosis was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 174 fully characterized CHB patients with an average age of 50.2±11.2 (29-86 years) and a male predominance (65.2%) were included. Of these, 23% had significant fibrosis (≥F2) per SWE (>7.1KPA). A significant and linear correlation was found between the SWE score and FIB-4 values (r=0.572; P<0.001). A lower cut-off of 1.43 has yielded an AUROC of 0.76, with a sensitivity of 68.8%, specificity of 79.8%, diagnostic accuracy of 78.5%, and NPV of 96%. On the contrary, NLR values were similar between significant and minimal fibrosis and were not found to be correlated with significant fibrosis (r=0.54, P=0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIB4 has a moderate performance and may have a valuable role in excluding significant fibrosis in CHB patients in daily practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"299-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.23.03347-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.23.03347-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少有研究探讨基于实验室指标的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者肝纤维化预测指标的性能和诊断准确性,结果也不尽相同。我们的目的是研究 FIB-4 和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)标记物在实际生活中区分明显和不明显肝纤维化的性能:我们前瞻性地招募了在肝病门诊就诊的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,让他们接受剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和血液检测。通过接收器操作特征(ROC)分析评估了 FIB-4 和 NLR 对肝纤维化的预测准确性:共纳入了 174 例特征完整的慢性乙型肝炎患者,平均年龄为 50.2±11.2(29-86 岁),男性占多数(65.2%)。其中,23%的患者有明显的纤维化(≥F2),SWE(>7.1KPA)。SWE评分与FIB-4值之间存在明显的线性相关(r=0.572;结论:FIB-4的性能适中,可用于诊断肺癌:FIB4 的性能适中,在日常实践中可能对排除慢性阻塞性肺病患者的明显纤维化有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of serum-based biomarkers in fibrosis prediction of chronic hepatitis B patients in real life practice.

Background: Few studies have addressed the performance and diagnostic accuracy of laboratory-based markers for fibrosis prediction in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients yielding heterogeneous results. We aimed to study the performance of the FIB-4 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) markers for the differentiation between significant and non-significant hepatic fibrosis in real-life practice.

Methods: We prospectively recruited CHB patients attending the hepatology clinic to undergo shear wave elastography (SWE) and blood tests. The predictive accuracy of FIB-4 and NLR for liver fibrosis was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

Results: Overall, 174 fully characterized CHB patients with an average age of 50.2±11.2 (29-86 years) and a male predominance (65.2%) were included. Of these, 23% had significant fibrosis (≥F2) per SWE (>7.1KPA). A significant and linear correlation was found between the SWE score and FIB-4 values (r=0.572; P<0.001). A lower cut-off of 1.43 has yielded an AUROC of 0.76, with a sensitivity of 68.8%, specificity of 79.8%, diagnostic accuracy of 78.5%, and NPV of 96%. On the contrary, NLR values were similar between significant and minimal fibrosis and were not found to be correlated with significant fibrosis (r=0.54, P=0.39).

Conclusions: FIB4 has a moderate performance and may have a valuable role in excluding significant fibrosis in CHB patients in daily practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva gastroenterology
Minerva gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between intestinal microflora and obesity. The impact of comprehensive nursing intervention on the psychological status and quality of life of patients with severe acute myeloid leukemia. Health-related quality of life in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: a cross-sectional study from a single centre in Denmark. Analysis of prognostic factors and model establishment of long-term postoperative effect in children with hepatoblastoma. Serrated polyps <10 mm cannot reliably be characterized by i-Scan without magnification at routine colonoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1