国防参与(卫生):历史视角。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bmj Military Health Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1136/military-2023-002412
Thomas Falconer Hall, K Attridge
{"title":"国防参与(卫生):历史视角。","authors":"Thomas Falconer Hall, K Attridge","doi":"10.1136/military-2023-002412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defence Engagement (DE) (Health) themes are reviewed in this paper through two historical perspectives set in very different contexts. The first-person narrative in <i>Guerrilla Surgeon</i> by Lindsay Rogers outlines the experience of a medical officer building capacity with Tito's Partisans behind enemy lines in Second World War Yugoslavia. This is contrasted with a more academic evaluation of strategic and medical benefits of DE (Health) delivered by the US military during the Vietnam War in Robert Wilensky's <i>Military Medicine to Win Hearts and Minds: Aid to Civilians in the Vietnam War</i> Both texts infer that clear objectives, supported by effective strategic communication, are required for the impact of DE (Health) to be fully realised. Wilensky, in particular, noted that the US military medical effort in Vietnam had no measurable impact on health or political goals in the conflict. Rogers' experience on a more individual level speaks to the promise of DE (Health) delivery contrasted against the lack of regional objectives and cites the loss of British influence when Soviet propaganda was more cohesive and coordinated, resulting in the shift in Partisan loyalty despite British efforts in supplying the bulk of military and medical material. While neither author offers a definitive guide on DE (Health), they offer clear examples of themes that should be considered and demonstrate the importance of evaluating activity and maintaining the historical record to provide an evidence base for future work. This is an article commissioned for the Defence Engagement special issue of BMJ Military Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defence Engagement (Health): a historical perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Falconer Hall, K Attridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/military-2023-002412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Defence Engagement (DE) (Health) themes are reviewed in this paper through two historical perspectives set in very different contexts. The first-person narrative in <i>Guerrilla Surgeon</i> by Lindsay Rogers outlines the experience of a medical officer building capacity with Tito's Partisans behind enemy lines in Second World War Yugoslavia. This is contrasted with a more academic evaluation of strategic and medical benefits of DE (Health) delivered by the US military during the Vietnam War in Robert Wilensky's <i>Military Medicine to Win Hearts and Minds: Aid to Civilians in the Vietnam War</i> Both texts infer that clear objectives, supported by effective strategic communication, are required for the impact of DE (Health) to be fully realised. Wilensky, in particular, noted that the US military medical effort in Vietnam had no measurable impact on health or political goals in the conflict. Rogers' experience on a more individual level speaks to the promise of DE (Health) delivery contrasted against the lack of regional objectives and cites the loss of British influence when Soviet propaganda was more cohesive and coordinated, resulting in the shift in Partisan loyalty despite British efforts in supplying the bulk of military and medical material. While neither author offers a definitive guide on DE (Health), they offer clear examples of themes that should be considered and demonstrate the importance of evaluating activity and maintaining the historical record to provide an evidence base for future work. This is an article commissioned for the Defence Engagement special issue of BMJ Military Health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过两个背景截然不同的历史视角,对国防参与(DE)(健康)主题进行了回顾。林赛-罗杰斯(Lindsay Rogers)在《游击外科医生》(Guerrilla Surgeon)一书中以第一人称的叙述方式,概述了第二次世界大战期间南斯拉夫敌后铁托游击队中一名医务官员的能力建设经历。罗伯特-威伦斯基(Robert Wilensky)的《赢得人心的军事医学》(Military Medicine to Win Hearts and Minds)对美军在越战期间提供的医疗保健服务的战略和医疗效益进行了更具学术性的评估:这两本书都推断,要想充分发挥发展(健康)教育的影响,就必须有明确的目标,并辅以有效的战略沟通。威伦斯基特别指出,美军在越南的医疗工作对冲突中的健康或政治目标没有产生可衡量的影响。罗杰斯(Rogers)在个人层面上的经验则表明,尽管英国为越南提供了大量的军事和医疗物资,但在缺乏地区目标的情况下,DE(健康)的交付前景却不容乐观,他还提到,当苏联的宣传更具凝聚力和协调性时,英国的影响力也随之丧失,导致游击队的忠诚度发生变化。虽然两位作者都没有提供关于 DE(卫生)的权威指南,但他们提供了应考虑的主题的明确例子,并证明了评估活动和保留历史记录的重要性,从而为未来工作提供证据基础。本文是受委托为《BMJ 军事健康》国防参与特刊撰写的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defence Engagement (Health): a historical perspective.

Defence Engagement (DE) (Health) themes are reviewed in this paper through two historical perspectives set in very different contexts. The first-person narrative in Guerrilla Surgeon by Lindsay Rogers outlines the experience of a medical officer building capacity with Tito's Partisans behind enemy lines in Second World War Yugoslavia. This is contrasted with a more academic evaluation of strategic and medical benefits of DE (Health) delivered by the US military during the Vietnam War in Robert Wilensky's Military Medicine to Win Hearts and Minds: Aid to Civilians in the Vietnam War Both texts infer that clear objectives, supported by effective strategic communication, are required for the impact of DE (Health) to be fully realised. Wilensky, in particular, noted that the US military medical effort in Vietnam had no measurable impact on health or political goals in the conflict. Rogers' experience on a more individual level speaks to the promise of DE (Health) delivery contrasted against the lack of regional objectives and cites the loss of British influence when Soviet propaganda was more cohesive and coordinated, resulting in the shift in Partisan loyalty despite British efforts in supplying the bulk of military and medical material. While neither author offers a definitive guide on DE (Health), they offer clear examples of themes that should be considered and demonstrate the importance of evaluating activity and maintaining the historical record to provide an evidence base for future work. This is an article commissioned for the Defence Engagement special issue of BMJ Military Health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
期刊最新文献
Observational study of the effects of maximal oxygen uptake on cognitive function and performance during prolonged military exercise. Analysis of emergency resuscitative thoracotomy in the combat setting. MSKI reduction strategies: evidence-based interventions to reduce musculoskeletal injuries in military service members. Anxiety and its relationship to demographic and personality traits data among special operations divers: a cross-sectional study. Clothing and individual equipment for the female soldier: developing a framework to improve the evidence base which informs future design and evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1