Microorganism colonization of peripheral venous catheters in a small animal clinical setting

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI:10.1111/vec.13328
Erica Matula VMD, Alicia Mastrocco DVM, DACVECC, Jennifer Prittie DVM, DACVIM, DACVECC, Joel Weltman DVM, DACVECC, PhD, Christine Keyserling DVM, DACVECC
{"title":"Microorganism colonization of peripheral venous catheters in a small animal clinical setting","authors":"Erica Matula VMD,&nbsp;Alicia Mastrocco DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Jennifer Prittie DVM, DACVIM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Joel Weltman DVM, DACVECC, PhD,&nbsp;Christine Keyserling DVM, DACVECC","doi":"10.1111/vec.13328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the incidence of microorganism colonization of peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) placed in the Emergency Department (ED) to those placed in a routine preoperative setting. The relationship between catheter tip colonization and patient urgency (as assessed by triage priority) was also evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective, observational study from January 2021 to October 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency room and clinical areas of a large, urban, tertiary referral center.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Three hundred dogs and 94 cats with a PVC in place for a minimum of 24 hours were enrolled in the study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>None.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and eighty-eight PVCs were placed in the ED and 106 were placed preoperatively. The overall colonization rate was 10.4% (41/394). Sixteen bacterial and 1 fungal genera were cultured. Eight of these bacterial genera (25/51 [49%] bacterial isolates) were resistant to at least 1 antimicrobial class. Twenty-nine of 288 (10.1%) catheters positive for colonization were placed in the ED, whereas 12 of 106 (11.3%) were placed preoperatively. There was no association between microorganism growth on catheters and clinical area of catheter placement. There was also no association between ED patient urgency and positive catheter tip culture. No significant risk factors were identified predisposing to colonization of PVCs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The overall incidence of microorganism colonization of PVCs in this study population was equivalent to, or lower than, previously reported in veterinary literature. There was no statistical difference between the catheters placed in the ED and those placed for routine surgical procedures. Patient urgency did not affect the incidence of positivity of peripheral catheter tip cultures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"33 5","pages":"509-519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the incidence of microorganism colonization of peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) placed in the Emergency Department (ED) to those placed in a routine preoperative setting. The relationship between catheter tip colonization and patient urgency (as assessed by triage priority) was also evaluated.

Design

Prospective, observational study from January 2021 to October 2021.

Setting

Emergency room and clinical areas of a large, urban, tertiary referral center.

Animals

Three hundred dogs and 94 cats with a PVC in place for a minimum of 24 hours were enrolled in the study.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Main Results

Two hundred and eighty-eight PVCs were placed in the ED and 106 were placed preoperatively. The overall colonization rate was 10.4% (41/394). Sixteen bacterial and 1 fungal genera were cultured. Eight of these bacterial genera (25/51 [49%] bacterial isolates) were resistant to at least 1 antimicrobial class. Twenty-nine of 288 (10.1%) catheters positive for colonization were placed in the ED, whereas 12 of 106 (11.3%) were placed preoperatively. There was no association between microorganism growth on catheters and clinical area of catheter placement. There was also no association between ED patient urgency and positive catheter tip culture. No significant risk factors were identified predisposing to colonization of PVCs.

Conclusions

The overall incidence of microorganism colonization of PVCs in this study population was equivalent to, or lower than, previously reported in veterinary literature. There was no statistical difference between the catheters placed in the ED and those placed for routine surgical procedures. Patient urgency did not affect the incidence of positivity of peripheral catheter tip cultures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小动物临床环境中外周静脉导管的微生物定植。
目的:比较急诊科和常规术前放置的外周静脉导管的微生物定植发生率。还评估了导管尖端定植与患者紧急程度之间的关系(通过分诊优先级评估)。设计:2021年1月至2021年10月的前瞻性观察性研究。设置:大型城市三级转诊中心的急诊室和临床区域。动物:300只狗和94只猫在PVC放置至少24小时后参与了这项研究。干预措施:无。测量和主要结果:在ED中放置了288个PVC,术前放置了106个。总定植率为10.4%(41/394)。培养了16个细菌属和1个真菌属。这些细菌属中有8个属(25/51[49%]的细菌分离株)对至少1类抗菌药物具有耐药性。288根定植阳性导管中有29根(10.1%)置入ED,而106根导管中有12根(11.3%)置入术前。导管上的微生物生长与导管放置的临床区域之间没有关联。ED患者的紧迫感与导管尖端培养阳性之间也没有关联。没有发现导致硬聚氯乙烯定植的显著危险因素。结论:本研究人群中PVC微生物定殖的总体发生率与兽医文献中报道的相当或更低。放置在ED中的导管与放置在常规外科手术中的导管之间没有统计学差异。患者的紧迫感并不影响外周导管尖端培养阳性的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Fabio Viganó Jennifer J. Devey Issue Information - Prelim AUTHOR INDEX Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1