How hospital top managers reason about the central leadership task of balancing quality of patient care, economy and professionals' engagement: an interview study.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Leadership in Health Services Pub Date : 2022-12-27 DOI:10.1108/LHS-02-2022-0009
Fredrik Bååthe, Mia von Knorring, Karin Isaksson-Rø
{"title":"How hospital top managers reason about the central leadership task of balancing quality of patient care, economy and professionals' engagement: an interview study.","authors":"Fredrik Bååthe, Mia von Knorring, Karin Isaksson-Rø","doi":"10.1108/LHS-02-2022-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to deepen the understanding of how top managers reason about handling the relationships between quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative design. Individual in-depth interviews with all members of the executive management team at an emergency hospital in Norway were analysed using reflexive thematic method. Findings The top managers had the intention to balance between quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. This became increasingly difficult in times of high internal or external pressures. Then top management acted as if economy was the most important focus. Practical implications For health-care top managers to lead the pursuit towards increased sustainability in health care, there is a need to balance between quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. This study shows that this balancing act is not an anomaly top-managers can eradicate. Instead, they need to recognize, accept and deliberately act with that in mind, which can create virtuous development spirals where managers and health-professional communicate and collaborate, benefitting quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. However, this study builds on a limited number of participants. More research is needed. Originality/value Sustainable health care needs to balance quality of patient care and economy while at the same time ensure professionals’ engagement. Even though this is a central leadership task for managers at all levels, there is limited knowledge about how top managers reason about this.","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-02-2022-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to deepen the understanding of how top managers reason about handling the relationships between quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative design. Individual in-depth interviews with all members of the executive management team at an emergency hospital in Norway were analysed using reflexive thematic method. Findings The top managers had the intention to balance between quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. This became increasingly difficult in times of high internal or external pressures. Then top management acted as if economy was the most important focus. Practical implications For health-care top managers to lead the pursuit towards increased sustainability in health care, there is a need to balance between quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. This study shows that this balancing act is not an anomaly top-managers can eradicate. Instead, they need to recognize, accept and deliberately act with that in mind, which can create virtuous development spirals where managers and health-professional communicate and collaborate, benefitting quality of patient care, economy and professionals’ engagement. However, this study builds on a limited number of participants. More research is needed. Originality/value Sustainable health care needs to balance quality of patient care and economy while at the same time ensure professionals’ engagement. Even though this is a central leadership task for managers at all levels, there is limited knowledge about how top managers reason about this.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院高层管理者如何解释平衡病人护理质量、经济和专业人员参与的核心领导任务:一项访谈研究。
目的:本研究旨在加深对高层管理人员如何处理患者护理质量、经济和专业人员参与之间关系的理解。设计/方法论/方法:定性设计。对挪威一家急诊医院执行管理团队所有成员进行的个别深入访谈,采用反身性专题方法进行了分析。研究发现:高层管理人员有意在患者护理质量、经济和专业人员参与之间取得平衡。在内部或外部压力很大的时候,这变得越来越困难。然后,高层管理人员表现得好像经济是最重要的焦点。实际影响:要使卫生保健高层管理人员领导追求提高卫生保健的可持续性,就需要在病人护理质量、经济和专业人员参与之间取得平衡。这项研究表明,这种平衡行为并不是高层管理者可以消除的异常现象。相反,他们需要认识到、接受并有意识地将这一点牢记在心,这可以创造良性的发展螺旋,使管理人员和卫生专业人员进行沟通和合作,从而有利于提高患者护理质量、经济效益和专业人员的参与。然而,这项研究的参与者数量有限。需要更多的研究。独创性/价值:可持续的医疗保健需要平衡病人护理的质量和经济,同时确保专业人员的参与。尽管这是各级管理人员的核心领导任务,但关于高层管理人员如何对此进行推理的知识有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Contexts and complexities: a realist evaluation of integrated care system leadership. Ethical leadership in health-care organizations - a scoping review. Leadership in federally qualified health centers: examining recruitment and retention in rural Oklahoma. A case study of a pilot leadership skills program to clarify professional fulfillment sources for academic physicians. Exploring the relationship between patient safety culture and the full-range leadership theory in primary care settings: a conceptual analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1