Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Parents Experiencing Vulnerability: Lessons from an Online Parenting Program.

Jelena Komanchuk, Nicole Letourneau, Linda Duffett-Leger, Judy L Cameron
{"title":"Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Parents Experiencing Vulnerability: Lessons from an Online Parenting Program.","authors":"Jelena Komanchuk,&nbsp;Nicole Letourneau,&nbsp;Linda Duffett-Leger,&nbsp;Judy L Cameron","doi":"10.1177/08445621231171971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supportive parenting programs can promote parent-child interactions and children's development. However, families experiencing vulnerability (e.g., low socioeconomic status) report barriers (e.g., transportation, distrust of researchers) to research participation, and attrition rates of 40% and higher have been reported in parenting research. In response, we conducted a longitudinal evaluation of a digital parenting program in a major metropolitan centre in western Canada and retained 99% of our sample.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Review recruitment and retention strategies employed in the First Pathways study and evaluate associations between sociodemographic (e.g., income) and psychosocial (e.g., parental depression) factors with recruitment and retention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>In collaboration with community agencies, we commenced recruitment of 100 families experiencing vulnerability (e.g., low-income) in June 2021. We utilized strategies to engage staff (e.g., presentations, gift cards, updates) and employed snowball sampling. Families recruited through community agencies were significantly more likely to experience vulnerability (e.g., low income and education, high adverse experiences) compared to families in the snowball sample. We incorporated strategies to minimize participant burden (e.g., choice of online or in-person meetings), promoted rapport (e.g., holiday texts, nonjudgmental environment), incorporated trauma-informed practices (e.g., sensitive inquiry), and demonstrated appreciation for participants' contributions (i.e., honorarium). Family experiences of vulnerability (i.e., low income, depressive symptoms, adversity) were correlated with higher participant rescheduling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses need knowledge of strategies to promote equitable access to research for families experiencing vulnerability. Digital programs with protocols designed to establish rapport, include trauma-informed practices, and minimize participant burden will likely optimize participation and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"55 3","pages":"377-387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621231171971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Supportive parenting programs can promote parent-child interactions and children's development. However, families experiencing vulnerability (e.g., low socioeconomic status) report barriers (e.g., transportation, distrust of researchers) to research participation, and attrition rates of 40% and higher have been reported in parenting research. In response, we conducted a longitudinal evaluation of a digital parenting program in a major metropolitan centre in western Canada and retained 99% of our sample.

Aim: Review recruitment and retention strategies employed in the First Pathways study and evaluate associations between sociodemographic (e.g., income) and psychosocial (e.g., parental depression) factors with recruitment and retention strategies.

Methods and findings: In collaboration with community agencies, we commenced recruitment of 100 families experiencing vulnerability (e.g., low-income) in June 2021. We utilized strategies to engage staff (e.g., presentations, gift cards, updates) and employed snowball sampling. Families recruited through community agencies were significantly more likely to experience vulnerability (e.g., low income and education, high adverse experiences) compared to families in the snowball sample. We incorporated strategies to minimize participant burden (e.g., choice of online or in-person meetings), promoted rapport (e.g., holiday texts, nonjudgmental environment), incorporated trauma-informed practices (e.g., sensitive inquiry), and demonstrated appreciation for participants' contributions (i.e., honorarium). Family experiences of vulnerability (i.e., low income, depressive symptoms, adversity) were correlated with higher participant rescheduling.

Conclusion: Nurses need knowledge of strategies to promote equitable access to research for families experiencing vulnerability. Digital programs with protocols designed to establish rapport, include trauma-informed practices, and minimize participant burden will likely optimize participation and retention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为经历脆弱性的父母招聘和保留策略:来自在线育儿计划的经验教训。
背景:支持性育儿方案可以促进亲子互动和儿童的发展。然而,经历脆弱性(例如,低社会经济地位)的家庭报告了参与研究的障碍(例如,交通,对研究人员的不信任),在育儿研究中报告的损失率为40%甚至更高。作为回应,我们对加拿大西部一个主要大都市中心的数字育儿计划进行了纵向评估,并保留了99%的样本。目的:回顾第一路径研究中采用的招聘和保留策略,并评估社会人口学(如收入)和社会心理(如父母抑郁)因素与招聘和保留策略之间的关系。方法和调查结果:我们与社区机构合作,于2021年6月开始招募100个弱势家庭(如低收入家庭)。我们利用策略来吸引员工(例如,演示,礼品卡,更新),并采用滚雪球抽样。与雪球样本中的家庭相比,通过社区机构招募的家庭更有可能经历脆弱性(例如,低收入和教育,高不良经历)。我们采用了一些策略来减少参与者的负担(例如,选择在线会议或面对面会议),促进关系(例如,节日短信,非评判环境),结合创伤知情实践(例如,敏感询问),并对参与者的贡献(例如,酬金)表示赞赏。脆弱的家庭经历(即低收入、抑郁症状、逆境)与较高的参与者重新安排相关。结论:护士需要了解促进弱势家庭公平获得研究的策略。带有协议的数字项目旨在建立融洽的关系,包括创伤知情实践,并最大限度地减少参与者的负担,这可能会优化参与和保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: We are pleased to announce the launch of the CJNR digital archive, an online archive available through the McGill University Library, and hosted by the McGill University Library Digital Collections Program in perpetuity. This archive has been made possible through a Richard M. Tomlinson Digital Library Innovation and Access Award to the McGill School of Nursing. The Richard M. Tomlinson award recognizes the ongoing contribution and commitment the CJNR has made to the McGill School of Nursing, and to the development and nursing science in Canada and worldwide. We hope this archive proves to be an invaluable research tool for researchers in Nursing and other faculties.
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Unseen Strain: The Hidden Challenges of Black Nursing Faculty in the Fight Against Anti-Black Racism. Developing Policy Infrastructure to Guide Genomics-Informed Oncology Nursing in Canada: An Interpretive Descriptive Study. "Treat Me Like a Person": Unveiling Healthcare Narratives of Muslim Women who Wear Islamic Head Coverings Through a Poststructural Narrative Study. Facilitators and Barriers to Developing a Research Program: A Focused Ethnography of New Tenure-Track PhD-Prepared Nursing Faculty. Psycho-social Stressors Experienced by Young war Refugees in Developed Countries: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1