Autopilot functionality and self-destructive behavior in patients with complex dissociative disorders-A qualitative study.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1037/tra0001571
Claudia Schnupp, Heribert Sattel, Eva Morawa, Miriam Kronester, Martin Sack, Eva Schäflein
{"title":"Autopilot functionality and self-destructive behavior in patients with complex dissociative disorders-A qualitative study.","authors":"Claudia Schnupp, Heribert Sattel, Eva Morawa, Miriam Kronester, Martin Sack, Eva Schäflein","doi":"10.1037/tra0001571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dissociative disorders are common in psychiatric patients and severely impact patients' lives. They are, however, underdiagnosed, thus preventing patients from accessing timely and adequate therapy. Identifying how patients with dissociative disorders relate to themselves could improve diagnostics. However, this question has not been explored in detail. The aim of the study was to gain insights into how people with complex dissociative disorders relate to themselves.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with ten women diagnosed with complex dissociative disorders who had previously completed trauma-focused therapy. Data were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described their behavior toward themselves before the start of the therapy as \"autopilot-functional\" and \"self-destructive.\" The \"autopilot functionality\" was characterized by being outward-oriented and ignoring one's own needs. Hence, participants only appeared to be functional. \"Self-destructive behavior\" was described as a spectrum of various destructive behaviors (e.g., eating disorders, self-harm, excessive exercise, and substance abuse) that participants perceived as a cohesive complex. The participants illustrated that both behaviors were driven by a lack of self-empathy and connected to suppression and poor perception of bodily stimuli.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\"Autopilot functionality\" seems to be a hallmark in patients with complex dissociative disorders. With patients hiding their self-destructive behavior, health personnel may misjudge the severity of these patients' mental illness. Neither \"autopilot functionality\" nor \"self-destructive behavior\" should be judged (neither negatively nor positively), but one should understand both as a coping mechanism for trauma-related disorders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"316-322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dissociative disorders are common in psychiatric patients and severely impact patients' lives. They are, however, underdiagnosed, thus preventing patients from accessing timely and adequate therapy. Identifying how patients with dissociative disorders relate to themselves could improve diagnostics. However, this question has not been explored in detail. The aim of the study was to gain insights into how people with complex dissociative disorders relate to themselves.

Method: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with ten women diagnosed with complex dissociative disorders who had previously completed trauma-focused therapy. Data were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Participants described their behavior toward themselves before the start of the therapy as "autopilot-functional" and "self-destructive." The "autopilot functionality" was characterized by being outward-oriented and ignoring one's own needs. Hence, participants only appeared to be functional. "Self-destructive behavior" was described as a spectrum of various destructive behaviors (e.g., eating disorders, self-harm, excessive exercise, and substance abuse) that participants perceived as a cohesive complex. The participants illustrated that both behaviors were driven by a lack of self-empathy and connected to suppression and poor perception of bodily stimuli.

Conclusions: "Autopilot functionality" seems to be a hallmark in patients with complex dissociative disorders. With patients hiding their self-destructive behavior, health personnel may misjudge the severity of these patients' mental illness. Neither "autopilot functionality" nor "self-destructive behavior" should be judged (neither negatively nor positively), but one should understand both as a coping mechanism for trauma-related disorders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂分离性障碍患者的自动驾驶功能与自毁行为——一项定性研究。
目的:解离性障碍在精神疾病患者中较为常见,严重影响患者的生活。然而,这些疾病未得到充分诊断,从而使患者无法获得及时和适当的治疗。确定解离性障碍患者与自己的关系可以改善诊断。然而,这个问题还没有被详细探讨过。这项研究的目的是深入了解患有复杂分离性疾病的人是如何与自己相处的。方法:我们对10名被诊断为复杂分离性障碍的女性进行了半结构化的定性访谈,这些女性之前已经完成了以创伤为重点的治疗。数据通过反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:参与者描述他们在治疗开始前对自己的行为是“自动驾驶功能”和“自我毁灭”。“自动驾驶功能”的特点是向外导向,忽视自己的需求。因此,参与者只是看起来是功能性的。“自我毁灭行为”被描述为各种破坏性行为(例如,饮食失调、自我伤害、过度运动和药物滥用)的光谱,参与者将其视为一种凝聚力情结。参与者表明,这两种行为都是由于缺乏自我同理心,并与压抑和对身体刺激的感知能力差有关。结论:“自动驾驶功能”似乎是复杂分离性障碍患者的一个标志。由于患者隐瞒了他们的自毁行为,卫生人员可能会误判这些患者精神疾病的严重程度。无论是“自动驾驶功能”还是“自我毁灭行为”都不应该被评判(既不是消极的也不是积极的),但人们应该将两者理解为创伤相关障碍的应对机制。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in affect during suicidal and nonsuicidal states among military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Recent intimate partner violence is associated with worse sexual function among women veterans. Exposures to potentially psychologically traumatic events: A national study of correctional workers in Canadian provinces and territories. A mixed-methods study of campus supports and institutional betrayal after sexual violence: Findings from a population-representative sample of U.S. college students. Anxiety induced by artificial intelligence (AI) painting: An investigation based on the fear acquisition theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1