Priorities for peer support delivery among adults living with chronic kidney disease: a patient-oriented consensus workshop.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220171
Meghan J Elliott, Maoliosa Donald, Janine Farragher, Nancy Verdin, Shannan Love, Kate Manns, Brigitte Baragar, Dwight Sparkes, Danielle Fox, Brenda R Hemmelgarn
{"title":"Priorities for peer support delivery among adults living with chronic kidney disease: a patient-oriented consensus workshop.","authors":"Meghan J Elliott,&nbsp;Maoliosa Donald,&nbsp;Janine Farragher,&nbsp;Nancy Verdin,&nbsp;Shannan Love,&nbsp;Kate Manns,&nbsp;Brigitte Baragar,&nbsp;Dwight Sparkes,&nbsp;Danielle Fox,&nbsp;Brenda R Hemmelgarn","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peer support can address the informational and emotional needs of people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and enable self-management. We aimed to identify preferences and priorities for content, format and processes of peer support delivery for patients with non-dialysis CKD and their loved ones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a patient-oriented research approach, we conducted a half-day, virtual consensus workshop with stakeholder participants from across Canada, including patients, caregivers, peer mentors and clinicians. Using personas (fictional characters), participants discussed and voted on preferences for delivery of peer support across format, content and process categories. We analyzed transcripts from small- and large-group discussions inductively using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one stakeholders, including 9 patients and 4 caregivers, participated in the workshop. In the voting exercise on format, participants prioritized peer mentor matching, programming for both patients and caregivers, and flexible scheduling. For content, participants prioritized informational and emotional support focus, and for process, they prioritized leveraging kidney care programs and alternative sources (e.g., social media) for promotion and referral. Analysis of workshop transcripts complemented prioritization results and emphasized tailoring of peer support delivery to accommodate the diversity of people living with CKD and their support needs. This concept was elaborated in 3 themes, namely alignment of program features with needs, inclusive peer support options and multiple access points.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We identified preferences for peer support delivery for people living with CKD and underscore the importance of tailored, flexible programming in this context. Findings could be used to develop, adapt or study CKD-focused peer support interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 4","pages":"E736-E744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/ea/cmajo.20220171.PMC10435241.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peer support can address the informational and emotional needs of people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and enable self-management. We aimed to identify preferences and priorities for content, format and processes of peer support delivery for patients with non-dialysis CKD and their loved ones.

Methods: Using a patient-oriented research approach, we conducted a half-day, virtual consensus workshop with stakeholder participants from across Canada, including patients, caregivers, peer mentors and clinicians. Using personas (fictional characters), participants discussed and voted on preferences for delivery of peer support across format, content and process categories. We analyzed transcripts from small- and large-group discussions inductively using content analysis.

Results: Twenty-one stakeholders, including 9 patients and 4 caregivers, participated in the workshop. In the voting exercise on format, participants prioritized peer mentor matching, programming for both patients and caregivers, and flexible scheduling. For content, participants prioritized informational and emotional support focus, and for process, they prioritized leveraging kidney care programs and alternative sources (e.g., social media) for promotion and referral. Analysis of workshop transcripts complemented prioritization results and emphasized tailoring of peer support delivery to accommodate the diversity of people living with CKD and their support needs. This concept was elaborated in 3 themes, namely alignment of program features with needs, inclusive peer support options and multiple access points.

Interpretation: We identified preferences for peer support delivery for people living with CKD and underscore the importance of tailored, flexible programming in this context. Findings could be used to develop, adapt or study CKD-focused peer support interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人慢性肾病患者同伴支持的优先事项:以患者为导向的共识研讨会
背景:同伴支持可以解决慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的信息和情感需求,并使其能够自我管理。我们的目的是确定对非透析CKD患者及其亲人的同伴支持交付的内容、格式和过程的偏好和优先级。方法:采用以患者为导向的研究方法,我们与来自加拿大各地的利益相关者(包括患者、护理人员、同行导师和临床医生)进行了为期半天的虚拟共识研讨会。使用角色(虚构的角色),参与者讨论并投票选择跨格式、内容和过程类别提供同伴支持的偏好。我们使用内容分析归纳分析了来自小型和大型小组讨论的文本。结果:21名相关人员参加了研讨会,其中包括9名患者和4名护理人员。在形式的投票练习中,参与者优先考虑同伴导师匹配、患者和护理人员的编程以及灵活的日程安排。对于内容,参与者优先考虑信息和情感支持,对于过程,他们优先考虑利用肾脏护理计划和替代来源(例如社交媒体)进行推广和推荐。对研讨会记录的分析补充了优先排序结果,并强调了同伴支持交付的量身定制,以适应CKD患者及其支持需求的多样性。这个概念在3个主题中进行了阐述,即项目功能与需求的一致性,包括同伴支持选项和多个接入点。解释:我们确定了CKD患者对同伴支持的偏好,并强调了在这种情况下量身定制、灵活规划的重要性。研究结果可用于开发、调整或研究以ckd为重点的同伴支持干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study. Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis. Identifying clusters of coexisting conditions and outcomes among adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study. Is the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics in midlife associated with lower risk of cancer? Evidence from 3 European prospective cohorts. Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1