Fluctuations in Cognitive Test Scores and Loss to Follow-Up in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The IRIDE Cohort Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1159/000531764
Takumi Abe, Mari Yamashita, Yoshinori Fujiwara, Hiroyuki Sasai, Shuichi P Obuchi, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Shuichi Awata, Kenji Toba
{"title":"Fluctuations in Cognitive Test Scores and Loss to Follow-Up in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The IRIDE Cohort Study.","authors":"Takumi Abe, Mari Yamashita, Yoshinori Fujiwara, Hiroyuki Sasai, Shuichi P Obuchi, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Shuichi Awata, Kenji Toba","doi":"10.1159/000531764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We examined the relationship between previous fluctuations in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, future changes in MMSE scores, and attrition from follow-up surveys, which helps in a more comprehensive interpretation of repeatedly collected MMSE scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 4-year longitudinal study included 2,073 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years in Japan. The MMSE was administered at baseline (T0), 2 years (T1), and 4 years (T2) follow-up. We performed multinomial logistic regression analysis with the dependent variable, indicating the change in MMSE score from T1 to T2 (categorized as increase, no change [reference category], and decrease) and attrition at T2. The independent variables included the change in MMSE scores from T0 to T1 and MMSE scores at T0 and T1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MMSE score was 29 across the three time points. A one-point decrease in MMSE score from T0 to T1 was associated with 79% (95% confidence interval: 1.62, 1.97) higher odds of an increase in MMSE score from T1 to T2 and 28% (1.17, 1.40) higher odds of attrition at T2. A one-point decrement in the MMSE score at T0 and T1 was also associated with an increase in the MMSE score from T1 to T2 and attrition at T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Focusing on cognitive fluctuation for 2 years, rather than cognitive function at a point in time, would have no remarkable advantage when focusing on future cognitive function and attrition. Our results emphasize the need for further studies to identify factors that distinguish between those who continue to attend follow-up surveys and show improvements in cognitive test scores and those who drop out.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531764","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We examined the relationship between previous fluctuations in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, future changes in MMSE scores, and attrition from follow-up surveys, which helps in a more comprehensive interpretation of repeatedly collected MMSE scores.

Methods: This 4-year longitudinal study included 2,073 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years in Japan. The MMSE was administered at baseline (T0), 2 years (T1), and 4 years (T2) follow-up. We performed multinomial logistic regression analysis with the dependent variable, indicating the change in MMSE score from T1 to T2 (categorized as increase, no change [reference category], and decrease) and attrition at T2. The independent variables included the change in MMSE scores from T0 to T1 and MMSE scores at T0 and T1.

Results: The mean MMSE score was 29 across the three time points. A one-point decrease in MMSE score from T0 to T1 was associated with 79% (95% confidence interval: 1.62, 1.97) higher odds of an increase in MMSE score from T1 to T2 and 28% (1.17, 1.40) higher odds of attrition at T2. A one-point decrement in the MMSE score at T0 and T1 was also associated with an increase in the MMSE score from T1 to T2 and attrition at T2.

Conclusion: Focusing on cognitive fluctuation for 2 years, rather than cognitive function at a point in time, would have no remarkable advantage when focusing on future cognitive function and attrition. Our results emphasize the need for further studies to identify factors that distinguish between those who continue to attend follow-up surveys and show improvements in cognitive test scores and those who drop out.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居住在社区的老年人认知测试分数的波动和随访损失:IRIDE 队列研究》。
简介我们研究了迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)分数之前的波动、MMSE分数未来的变化以及后续调查中的自然减员之间的关系,这有助于更全面地解释重复收集的MMSE分数:这项为期 4 年的纵向研究纳入了日本 2,073 名年龄≥65 岁、居住在社区的老年人。分别在基线(T0)、2 年(T1)和 4 年(T2)随访期间进行了 MMSE 测评。我们进行了多项式逻辑回归分析,因变量为 MMSE 分数从 T1 到 T2 的变化(分为增加、无变化[参考类别]和减少)以及 T2 时的自然减员。自变量包括 MMSE 分数从 T0 到 T1 的变化以及 T0 和 T1 的 MMSE 分数:三个时间点的 MMSE 平均得分均为 29 分。从 T0 到 T1,MMSE 分数每下降一分,T1 到 T2 MMSE 分数上升的几率就会增加 79% (95% 置信区间:1.62, 1.97),T2 时自然减员的几率就会增加 28% (1.17, 1.40)。T0和T1的MMSE得分下降1分也与T1至T2的MMSE得分增加和T2时的减员有关:结论:关注两年内的认知波动,而不是某一时点的认知功能,在关注未来认知功能和自然减员时并无显著优势。我们的研究结果强调了进一步研究的必要性,以确定哪些因素可以区分那些继续参加后续调查并在认知测试分数上有所提高的人和那些辍学的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
期刊最新文献
Toolkit to Examine Lifelike Language (TELL) v.2.0: Optimizing speech biomarkers of neurodegeneration. Current Advances in Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Older Adults: A systematic Review. Risperidone for the Treatment of Dementia-Related Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Differential Item Functioning and Clinical Utility of the Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1