Incorporating implicit bias into research integrity education: Response to 'Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education'.

IF 2.8 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2023.2247974

Shivatej Dubbaka

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter focuses on the importance of incorporating implicit bias into research integrity education, and the significant impact it can have on creating an equitable research environment.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

将隐性偏见纳入研究诚信教育:对“为什么以及如何将种族/民族和性别问题纳入研究诚信教育”的回应。

这封信的重点是将隐性偏见纳入研究诚信教育的重要性，以及它对创造公平的研究环境的重大影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.