Imaging modalities for measuring body composition in patients with cancer: opportunities and challenges.

Urvi A Shah, Tarah J Ballinger, Rusha Bhandari, Christina M Dieli-Cornwright, Kristin A Guertin, Elizabeth A Hibler, Faiza Kalam, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Joseph E Ippolito
{"title":"Imaging modalities for measuring body composition in patients with cancer: opportunities and challenges.","authors":"Urvi A Shah, Tarah J Ballinger, Rusha Bhandari, Christina M Dieli-Cornwright, Kristin A Guertin, Elizabeth A Hibler, Faiza Kalam, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Joseph E Ippolito","doi":"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Body composition assessment (ie, the measurement of muscle and adiposity) impacts several cancer-related outcomes including treatment-related toxicities, treatment responses, complications, and prognosis. Traditional modalities for body composition measurement include body mass index, body circumference, skinfold thickness, and bioelectrical impedance analysis; advanced imaging modalities include dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, thus requiring an individualized approach in identifying the most appropriate measure for specific clinical or research situations. Advancements in imaging approaches have led to an abundance of available data, however, the lack of standardized thresholds for classification of abnormal muscle mass or adiposity has been a barrier to adopting these measurements widely in research and clinical care. In this review, we discuss the different modalities in detail and provide guidance on their unique opportunities and challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Body composition assessment (ie, the measurement of muscle and adiposity) impacts several cancer-related outcomes including treatment-related toxicities, treatment responses, complications, and prognosis. Traditional modalities for body composition measurement include body mass index, body circumference, skinfold thickness, and bioelectrical impedance analysis; advanced imaging modalities include dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, thus requiring an individualized approach in identifying the most appropriate measure for specific clinical or research situations. Advancements in imaging approaches have led to an abundance of available data, however, the lack of standardized thresholds for classification of abnormal muscle mass or adiposity has been a barrier to adopting these measurements widely in research and clinical care. In this review, we discuss the different modalities in detail and provide guidance on their unique opportunities and challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量癌症患者身体成分的成像方式:机遇与挑战。
身体成分评估(即肌肉和肥胖的测量)影响几种癌症相关结果,包括治疗相关毒性、治疗反应、并发症和预后。身体成分测量的传统方式包括体重指数、腰围、皮褶厚度和生物电阻抗分析;先进的成像方式包括双能x射线吸收仪、计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描。每种模式都有其优点和缺点,因此需要采取个性化的方法来确定针对特定临床或研究情况的最合适的措施。成像方法的进步带来了丰富的可用数据,然而,缺乏异常肌肉量或肥胖分类的标准化阈值一直是在研究和临床护理中广泛采用这些测量方法的障碍。在本次审查中,我们详细讨论了不同的模式,并就其独特的机遇和挑战提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Imaging modalities for measuring body composition in patients with cancer: opportunities and challenges. Correction to: A health equity framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models. Data quality in a survey of registered medical cannabis users with cancer: nonresponse and measurement error. Item response theory analysis of benefits and harms of cannabis use in cancer survivors. Overview of cancer patient perspectives on cannabis use during treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1