Normative Influence of the Stars: The Relative Indirect Effects of Celebrity Exemplars on Vaping Norm Perceptions Through Liking, Parasocial Relationship Strength, and Wishful Identification.
Elizabeth L Cohen, Mckay West, Koji Yoshimura, Molly E Farrell, Ashleigh Swain
{"title":"Normative Influence of the Stars: The Relative Indirect Effects of Celebrity Exemplars on Vaping Norm Perceptions Through Liking, Parasocial Relationship Strength, and Wishful Identification.","authors":"Elizabeth L Cohen, Mckay West, Koji Yoshimura, Molly E Farrell, Ashleigh Swain","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2023.2245594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the influence of celebrities on public health-related attitudes and behaviors is well established, the specific role that celebrity examples play in shaping health-related social norm perceptions is not well understood. To examine the effect of celebrities on social norm perceptions, young adults were randomly assigned to read news articles about vaping that either featured one of four film stars using a vape pen or did not contain any celebrity exemplar. The presence or absence of a celebrity exemplar did not affect readers' perceptions of vaping social norms. However, three types of audience involvement with the celebrities - liking, parasocial relationship strength, and wishful identification, were examined as mediators of the relative effects of the different celebrities on vaping norm perceptions. The results suggest that celebrities who people like <i>more</i> and those who they wishfully identify with <i>less</i> can wield a greater influence on social norms. PSR strength did not mediate indirect effects of celebrity on social norm perceptions. These findings indicate that celebrities can shape public perceptions of social norms through some types of involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2245594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the influence of celebrities on public health-related attitudes and behaviors is well established, the specific role that celebrity examples play in shaping health-related social norm perceptions is not well understood. To examine the effect of celebrities on social norm perceptions, young adults were randomly assigned to read news articles about vaping that either featured one of four film stars using a vape pen or did not contain any celebrity exemplar. The presence or absence of a celebrity exemplar did not affect readers' perceptions of vaping social norms. However, three types of audience involvement with the celebrities - liking, parasocial relationship strength, and wishful identification, were examined as mediators of the relative effects of the different celebrities on vaping norm perceptions. The results suggest that celebrities who people like more and those who they wishfully identify with less can wield a greater influence on social norms. PSR strength did not mediate indirect effects of celebrity on social norm perceptions. These findings indicate that celebrities can shape public perceptions of social norms through some types of involvement.
尽管名人对公众健康相关态度和行为的影响已得到公认,但人们对名人榜样在塑造健康相关社会规范认知方面所起的具体作用还不甚了解。为了研究名人对社会规范认知的影响,研究人员随机分配年轻成年人阅读关于吸食电子烟的新闻报道,这些报道要么介绍了四位电影明星中的一位使用电子烟笔,要么不包含任何名人范例。有无名人示范并不影响读者对吸食电子烟社会规范的看法。然而,受众对名人的三种参与类型--喜欢、寄生社会关系强度和一厢情愿的认同--被视为不同名人对吸烟规范认知的相对影响的中介因素。结果表明,人们更喜欢的名人和他们更不愿意认同的名人对社会规范的影响更大。名人对社会规范认知的间接影响并没有通过 PSR 强度来调节。这些结果表明,名人可以通过某些类型的参与来影响公众对社会规范的看法。
期刊介绍:
As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.