Current Perspectives on Pressure Injuries in Persons with Dark Skin Tones from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000032
Joyce Black, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Donna Z Bliss, Barbara Delmore, Vignesh Iyer, Jacqueline Massaro, Cassendra Munro, Joyce Pittman, Elizabeth A Ayello
{"title":"Current Perspectives on Pressure Injuries in Persons with Dark Skin Tones from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel.","authors":"Joyce Black, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Donna Z Bliss, Barbara Delmore, Vignesh Iyer, Jacqueline Massaro, Cassendra Munro, Joyce Pittman, Elizabeth A Ayello","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injury (PI) development is multifactorial. In patients with dark skin tones, identifying impending PIs by visual skin assessment can be especially challenging. The need for improved skin assessment techniques, especially for persons with dark skin tones, continues to increase. Similarly, greater awareness of the need for inclusivity with regard to representation of diverse skin colors/tones in education materials is apparent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide current perspectives from the literature surrounding skin assessment and PI development in patients with dark skin tones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following elements will be discussed through the lens of skin tone: (1) historical perspectives of PI staging from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, (2) epidemiology of PI, (3) anatomy and physiology of the skin, (3) skin tone assessment and measurement, (4) augmented visual assessment modalities, (5) PI prevention, (6) PI healing, (7) social determinants of health, and (8) gaps in clinician education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article highlights the gap in our clinical knowledge regarding PIs in patients with dark skin tones. Racial disparities with regard to PI development and healing are especially clear among patients with dark skin tones. Skin tone color assessment must be standardized and quantifiable in clinical education, practice, and research. This work is urgently needed, and support from private and governmental agencies is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"36 9","pages":"470-480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure injury (PI) development is multifactorial. In patients with dark skin tones, identifying impending PIs by visual skin assessment can be especially challenging. The need for improved skin assessment techniques, especially for persons with dark skin tones, continues to increase. Similarly, greater awareness of the need for inclusivity with regard to representation of diverse skin colors/tones in education materials is apparent.

Objective: To provide current perspectives from the literature surrounding skin assessment and PI development in patients with dark skin tones.

Methods: The following elements will be discussed through the lens of skin tone: (1) historical perspectives of PI staging from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, (2) epidemiology of PI, (3) anatomy and physiology of the skin, (3) skin tone assessment and measurement, (4) augmented visual assessment modalities, (5) PI prevention, (6) PI healing, (7) social determinants of health, and (8) gaps in clinician education.

Conclusions: This article highlights the gap in our clinical knowledge regarding PIs in patients with dark skin tones. Racial disparities with regard to PI development and healing are especially clear among patients with dark skin tones. Skin tone color assessment must be standardized and quantifiable in clinical education, practice, and research. This work is urgently needed, and support from private and governmental agencies is essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家压力伤害咨询小组关于深肤色人群压力伤害的当前观点。
背景:压力性损伤(PI)的发生是多因素的。对于肤色较深的患者,通过目测皮肤评估来识别即将发生的压伤尤其具有挑战性。对改进皮肤评估技术的需求不断增加,尤其是对深肤色患者。同样,在教育材料中体现不同肤色/色调的包容性的必要性显然也得到了进一步的认识:提供有关深肤色患者皮肤评估和 PI 发展的最新文献观点:方法:将从肤色的角度讨论以下内容:(1) 国家压力伤害咨询小组对肤色分期的历史观点;(2) 肤色损伤的流行病学;(3) 皮肤的解剖和生理学;(3) 肤色评估和测量;(4) 增强视觉评估模式;(5) 肤色损伤的预防;(6) 肤色损伤的愈合;(7) 健康的社会决定因素;(8) 临床医生教育中的差距:本文强调了我们在深肤色患者 PI 方面的临床知识差距。在深肤色患者中,PI 发生和愈合方面的种族差异尤为明显。在临床教育、实践和研究中,肤色评估必须标准化和量化。这项工作迫在眉睫,必须得到私人和政府机构的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Indices of Topical Antiseptics in Wound Care: A Systematic Review. Omega Fatty Acid-Based Therapy for Healing of Recalcitrant Wounds in Patients with Complex Comorbidities. A Catheter Securement Strategy for Patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa. Examining the Effect of Oral Health on Nutrition Status and Wound Healing. Healing with Systematic Wound Management after Minimally Invasive Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1