Guomin Chen , Xiping Zhang , Mengqi Yang , Hui Yu , Qing Cao
{"title":"Performance of tropical cyclone forecasts in the western North Pacific in 2017","authors":"Guomin Chen , Xiping Zhang , Mengqi Yang , Hui Yu , Qing Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.tcrr.2021.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The forecasts of tropical cyclones (TC) in 2017 from five official guides, six global models, six regional models and six ensemble systems were assessed to study the current capability of track and intensity forecasts for the western North Pacific. The results show that the position errors for official agencies were under 100, 165, 265,335 and 425 km at the lead times of 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h, respectively. As the forecast lead times increased, the forecasted TCs propagated, on average, too slow for most official guides. It is encouraging to note that all the models had positive skill scores, there is an overall upward trend in the skill scores of the models during from 2010 to 2017. Furthermore, both global and regional models' intensity forecast skill was increasing year by year from 2010 to 2017. For the ensemble prediction systems (EPSs), ECMWF-EPS was the best forecast system for the lead time less than 72 h, beyond the 72 h, the best EPS belong to NCEP-GEFS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44442,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tcrr.2021.03.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603221000023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
The forecasts of tropical cyclones (TC) in 2017 from five official guides, six global models, six regional models and six ensemble systems were assessed to study the current capability of track and intensity forecasts for the western North Pacific. The results show that the position errors for official agencies were under 100, 165, 265,335 and 425 km at the lead times of 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h, respectively. As the forecast lead times increased, the forecasted TCs propagated, on average, too slow for most official guides. It is encouraging to note that all the models had positive skill scores, there is an overall upward trend in the skill scores of the models during from 2010 to 2017. Furthermore, both global and regional models' intensity forecast skill was increasing year by year from 2010 to 2017. For the ensemble prediction systems (EPSs), ECMWF-EPS was the best forecast system for the lead time less than 72 h, beyond the 72 h, the best EPS belong to NCEP-GEFS.
期刊介绍:
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review is an international journal focusing on tropical cyclone monitoring, forecasting, and research as well as associated hydrological effects and disaster risk reduction. This journal is edited and published by the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee (TC) and the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorology Administration (STI/CMA). Contributions from all tropical cyclone basins are welcome.
Scope of the journal includes:
• Reviews of tropical cyclones exhibiting unusual characteristics or behavior or resulting in disastrous impacts on Typhoon Committee Members and other regional WMO bodies
• Advances in applied and basic tropical cyclone research or technology to improve tropical cyclone forecasts and warnings
• Basic theoretical studies of tropical cyclones
• Event reports, compelling images, and topic review reports of tropical cyclones
• Impacts, risk assessments, and risk management techniques related to tropical cyclones