Two deterministic methodologies for estimation of OGIP by production dynamics diagnostic of gas-condensate reservoir

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Upstream Oil and Gas Technology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100042
Chang Su , Gang Zhao , Hua Cai , Wanju Yuan , Lei Xiao , Kefeng Lu
{"title":"Two deterministic methodologies for estimation of OGIP by production dynamics diagnostic of gas-condensate reservoir","authors":"Chang Su ,&nbsp;Gang Zhao ,&nbsp;Hua Cai ,&nbsp;Wanju Yuan ,&nbsp;Lei Xiao ,&nbsp;Kefeng Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This study presents two independent methodologies for estimation of original gas in place (OGIP) by production dynamics diagnostic of gas-condensate reservoir with no-flow outer boundary based on black-oil concept. Classic Blasingame decline-type curves are also extended to apply in gas-condensate reservoir to calculate </span><em>kh</em>. Both numerically simulated case and field data are used to demonstrate the applicability and validity of proposed methodologies.</p><p><span>One method develops a novel analytical model to obtain average reservoir pressure<span>, OGIP and Diatz shape factor at the same time by coupling flow equation of gas-condensate reservoir for boundary dominated flow<span> (BDF) and general material balance equation (GMBE). The two-phase variable-rate flow equation at late time for BDF is clearly and concisely derived in this study in terms of defined two-phase pseodopressure and two-phase material balance pseudotime. In addition, another innovative, simple and effective method for estimation of OGIP is proposed in this study requiring input data of only cumulative production of well and </span></span></span>reservoir fluid PVT characteristics of Constant Volume Depletion (CVD) experiment. The fundamental concept of this method suggests that transient cumulative production GOR is determined by only current gas recovery degree and fluid PVT characteristics of the reservoir. Due to the accurate, simple and relaxed data-requiring nature of this method, widespread use in field to estimate OGIP of gas-condensate reservoir is potentially encouraging. On the contrary, if OGIP is already known, an intermediate equation of the method can also be applied to check accuracy of CVD experiment results from laboratory.</p><p><span>The first methodology extends OGIP estimation to gas-condensate reservoir from Blasingame and Lee (1988)’s method for dry-gas reservoir. Often used two-phase z factor, which is inconvenient to evaluate and easy to yield error, for gas-condensate reservoir in material balance equation is avoided in this methodology by applying more analytical and accurate Walsh et al. (1994)’s GMBE instead. The second methodology, to the authors’ knowledge, is the first proposed allowing OGIP estimation of gas condensate reservoir without requiring </span>bottom hole flowing pressure (BHFP), pressure tests and complex calculation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260421000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents two independent methodologies for estimation of original gas in place (OGIP) by production dynamics diagnostic of gas-condensate reservoir with no-flow outer boundary based on black-oil concept. Classic Blasingame decline-type curves are also extended to apply in gas-condensate reservoir to calculate kh. Both numerically simulated case and field data are used to demonstrate the applicability and validity of proposed methodologies.

One method develops a novel analytical model to obtain average reservoir pressure, OGIP and Diatz shape factor at the same time by coupling flow equation of gas-condensate reservoir for boundary dominated flow (BDF) and general material balance equation (GMBE). The two-phase variable-rate flow equation at late time for BDF is clearly and concisely derived in this study in terms of defined two-phase pseodopressure and two-phase material balance pseudotime. In addition, another innovative, simple and effective method for estimation of OGIP is proposed in this study requiring input data of only cumulative production of well and reservoir fluid PVT characteristics of Constant Volume Depletion (CVD) experiment. The fundamental concept of this method suggests that transient cumulative production GOR is determined by only current gas recovery degree and fluid PVT characteristics of the reservoir. Due to the accurate, simple and relaxed data-requiring nature of this method, widespread use in field to estimate OGIP of gas-condensate reservoir is potentially encouraging. On the contrary, if OGIP is already known, an intermediate equation of the method can also be applied to check accuracy of CVD experiment results from laboratory.

The first methodology extends OGIP estimation to gas-condensate reservoir from Blasingame and Lee (1988)’s method for dry-gas reservoir. Often used two-phase z factor, which is inconvenient to evaluate and easy to yield error, for gas-condensate reservoir in material balance equation is avoided in this methodology by applying more analytical and accurate Walsh et al. (1994)’s GMBE instead. The second methodology, to the authors’ knowledge, is the first proposed allowing OGIP estimation of gas condensate reservoir without requiring bottom hole flowing pressure (BHFP), pressure tests and complex calculation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凝析气藏生产动态诊断估算OGIP的两种确定性方法
本文提出了基于黑油概念的两种独立的外边界无流凝析气藏生产动态诊断方法来估算原始含气量。将经典的Blasingame递减型曲线推广到凝析气藏中,计算kh。数值模拟实例和现场数据都证明了所提出方法的适用性和有效性。一种方法通过将凝析气藏边界主导流流动方程(BDF)与一般物质平衡方程(GMBE)耦合,建立了一种新的解析模型,可以同时获得平均储层压力、OGIP和Diatz形状因子。本文根据定义的两相伪压力和两相物料平衡伪时间,清晰、简洁地推导出了BDF后期两相变速率流动方程。此外,本研究还提出了一种新颖、简单、有效的OGIP估算方法,该方法只需要输入井累积产量和储层流体PVT特征的恒容衰竭(CVD)实验数据。该方法的基本概念表明,瞬态累积生产GOR仅由当前的气采程度和储层流体PVT特征决定。由于该方法准确、简单且数据要求不高,因此在油田中广泛应用于估计凝析气藏的OGIP具有潜在的鼓舞作用。反之,如果已知OGIP,也可以用该方法的中间方程来检验实验室CVD实验结果的准确性。第一种方法将OGIP估计从Blasingame和Lee(1988)的干气储层方法扩展到凝析气藏。该方法避免了凝析气藏在物质平衡方程中经常使用的不方便评价且容易产生误差的两相z因子,采用了更具解析性和准确性的Walsh等(1994)的GMBE来代替。据作者所知,第二种方法是首次提出的允许OGIP估计凝析气藏而不需要井底流动压力(BHFP)、压力测试和复杂计算的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of pump jacks with theories and experiments Well perforating—More than reservoir connection A new method for predicting casing wear in highly deviated wells using mud logging data Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1