Gluteus Maximus Muscle Activation Characteristics During a Chair-Rise in Adults With Chronic Stroke.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000404
Michelle Sawtelle, Toni Roddey, Jennifer Ellison, Shih-Chiao Tseng
{"title":"Gluteus Maximus Muscle Activation Characteristics During a Chair-Rise in Adults With Chronic Stroke.","authors":"Michelle Sawtelle,&nbsp;Toni Roddey,&nbsp;Jennifer Ellison,&nbsp;Shih-Chiao Tseng","doi":"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>A successful chair-rise is an important indicator of functional independence post-stroke. Lower extremity electromyographic analyses provide a basis for muscle activation from which clinical intervention protocols may be derived. Gluteus maximus activation during the chair-rise has not been thoroughly researched in the chronic stroke population. This study investigated the magnitude and onset of gluteus maximus activation during the chair-rise comparing adults post-stroke with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, adults with chronic stroke (n = 12) and healthy controls (n = 12) completed 4 natural-speed chair-rise trials. Magnitude and onset of bilateral gluteus maximus activation were measured during the movement with secondary comparative data from biceps femoris and vastus lateralis muscles. Kinetic and kinematic measurements were used to quantify chair-rise phases and movement cycle duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant decreases in paretic ( P = 0.002), and nonparetic ( P = 0.001) gluteus maximus magnitudes were noted post-stroke compared with ipsilateral extremities of healthy adults. Significant gluteus maximus onset delays were noted in paretic extremities compared with nonparetic extremities post-stroke ( P = 0.009) that were not apparent in comparative muscles. Similar onset times were noted when comparing the paretic extremity post-stroke to the ipsilateral extremity of healthy controls ( P = 0.714) despite prolonged movement cycle durations in those with chronic stroke ( P = 0.001). No onset delays were evident in the biceps femoris ( P = 0.72) or vastus lateralis ( P = 0.338) muscles.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Despite apparent unilateral muscle weakness post-stroke, bilateral decreases in gluteus maximus activation magnitudes and compounding onset deficits of the paretic extremity were observed during chair-rising. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions maximizing bilateral activation magnitudes and improving temporal activation congruency during chair-rising will carry over to functional gainsVideo Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A387 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":49030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","volume":"46 4","pages":"270-280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: A successful chair-rise is an important indicator of functional independence post-stroke. Lower extremity electromyographic analyses provide a basis for muscle activation from which clinical intervention protocols may be derived. Gluteus maximus activation during the chair-rise has not been thoroughly researched in the chronic stroke population. This study investigated the magnitude and onset of gluteus maximus activation during the chair-rise comparing adults post-stroke with healthy controls.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, adults with chronic stroke (n = 12) and healthy controls (n = 12) completed 4 natural-speed chair-rise trials. Magnitude and onset of bilateral gluteus maximus activation were measured during the movement with secondary comparative data from biceps femoris and vastus lateralis muscles. Kinetic and kinematic measurements were used to quantify chair-rise phases and movement cycle duration.

Results: Significant decreases in paretic ( P = 0.002), and nonparetic ( P = 0.001) gluteus maximus magnitudes were noted post-stroke compared with ipsilateral extremities of healthy adults. Significant gluteus maximus onset delays were noted in paretic extremities compared with nonparetic extremities post-stroke ( P = 0.009) that were not apparent in comparative muscles. Similar onset times were noted when comparing the paretic extremity post-stroke to the ipsilateral extremity of healthy controls ( P = 0.714) despite prolonged movement cycle durations in those with chronic stroke ( P = 0.001). No onset delays were evident in the biceps femoris ( P = 0.72) or vastus lateralis ( P = 0.338) muscles.

Discussion and conclusions: Despite apparent unilateral muscle weakness post-stroke, bilateral decreases in gluteus maximus activation magnitudes and compounding onset deficits of the paretic extremity were observed during chair-rising. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions maximizing bilateral activation magnitudes and improving temporal activation congruency during chair-rising will carry over to functional gainsVideo Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A387 ).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性中风成人从椅子上起身时臀大肌的激活特征。
背景与目的:成功的起身是中风后功能独立的重要指标。下肢肌电图分析为肌肉激活提供了基础,由此可以推导出临床干预方案。在慢性中风人群中,对起立时臀大肌的激活还没有深入的研究。这项研究调查了成人中风后与健康对照者在椅子上升时臀大肌激活的幅度和开始。方法:在这项横断面研究中,慢性脑卒中成人(n = 12)和健康对照(n = 12)完成了4次自然速度椅子上升试验。在运动过程中测量双侧臀大肌激活的幅度和开始时间,并与股二头肌和股外侧肌的次要比较数据进行比较。动力学和运动学测量用于量化椅子上升阶段和运动周期持续时间。结果:与健康成人的同侧肢体相比,卒中后臀大肌麻痹(P = 0.002)和非麻痹(P = 0.001)显著减少。卒中后瘫瘫肢体与非瘫瘫肢体相比,臀大肌发作明显延迟(P = 0.009),而在比较肌肉中不明显。尽管慢性卒中患者的运动周期持续时间较长(P = 0.001),但将卒中后的瘫瘫肢体与健康对照者的同侧肢体进行比较时发现,发病时间相似(P = 0.714)。在股二头肌(P = 0.72)或股外侧肌(P = 0.338)中没有明显的发病延迟。讨论和结论:尽管中风后单侧肌肉明显无力,但在椅子上升过程中,观察到双侧臀大肌激活量减少,并出现瘫瘫肢体的复合发病缺陷。需要进一步的研究来确定干预措施是否最大化双侧激活幅度和改善椅子上升期间的时间激活一致性将延续到功能增益中。视频摘要可以从作者那里获得更多的见解(参见视频,补充数字内容1,可在:http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A387)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy (JNPT) is an indexed resource for dissemination of research-based evidence related to neurologic physical therapy intervention. High standards of quality are maintained through a rigorous, double-blinded, peer-review process and adherence to standards recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. With an international editorial board made up of preeminent researchers and clinicians, JNPT publishes articles of global relevance for examination, evaluation, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes for individuals with movement deficits due to neurologic conditions. Through systematic reviews, research articles, case studies, and clinical perspectives, JNPT promotes the integration of evidence into theory, education, research, and practice of neurologic physical therapy, spanning the continuum from pathophysiology to societal participation.
期刊最新文献
Measuring Exercise Self-Efficacy After Stroke: Validity and Reliability of Current Measures. Reflections and Aspirations: Shaping the Future of Neurologic Physical Therapy. Atypical PC-BPPV - Cupulolithiasis and Short-Arm Canalithiasis: A Retrospective Observational Study. Do People With Stroke Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Activity Guidelines? Data From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Effects of Diabetes and Attentional Focus on Learning of a Novel Balance Task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1