Red Blood Cell Sublethal Damage: Hemocompatibility Is not the Absence of Hemolysis

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.03.001
Antony P. McNamee, Michael J. Simmonds
{"title":"Red Blood Cell Sublethal Damage: Hemocompatibility Is not the Absence of Hemolysis","authors":"Antony P. McNamee,&nbsp;Michael J. Simmonds","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Blood is a complex fluid owing to its two-phase suspension of formed cellular elements within a protein-rich plasma. Vital to its role in distributing nutrients throughout the circulatory system, the mechanical properties of blood – and particularly red blood cells (RBC)—primarily determine bulk flow characteristics and microcirculatory flux. Various factors impair the physical properties of RBC, including cellular senescence, many diseases, and exposure to mechanical forces. Indeed, the latter is increasingly relevant following the advent of modern life support, such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS), which induce unique interactions between blood and artificial environments that leave blood cells with the signature of aging, albeit accelerated, and crucially underlie various serious complications, including death. Accumulating evidence indicates that these complications appear to be associated with mechanical shear forces present within MCS that are not extreme enough to overtly rupture cells, yet may still induce “sublethal” injury and “fatigue” to vital blood constituents. Impaired RBC physical properties following elevated shear exposure—a hallmark of sublethal injury to blood—are notable and may explain, at least in part, systemic complications and premature mortality associated with MCS. Design of optimal next-generation MCS devices thus requires consideration of biocompatibility and blood-device interactions to minimize potential blood complications and promote clinical success. Presented herein is a contemporary understanding of “blood damage,” with emphasis on shear exposures that alter microrheological function but do not overtly destroy cells (ie, sublethal damage). Identification of key cellular factors perturbed by supraphysiological shear exposure are examined, offering potential pathways to enhance design of MCS and blood-contacting medical devices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 150723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796323000135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood is a complex fluid owing to its two-phase suspension of formed cellular elements within a protein-rich plasma. Vital to its role in distributing nutrients throughout the circulatory system, the mechanical properties of blood – and particularly red blood cells (RBC)—primarily determine bulk flow characteristics and microcirculatory flux. Various factors impair the physical properties of RBC, including cellular senescence, many diseases, and exposure to mechanical forces. Indeed, the latter is increasingly relevant following the advent of modern life support, such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS), which induce unique interactions between blood and artificial environments that leave blood cells with the signature of aging, albeit accelerated, and crucially underlie various serious complications, including death. Accumulating evidence indicates that these complications appear to be associated with mechanical shear forces present within MCS that are not extreme enough to overtly rupture cells, yet may still induce “sublethal” injury and “fatigue” to vital blood constituents. Impaired RBC physical properties following elevated shear exposure—a hallmark of sublethal injury to blood—are notable and may explain, at least in part, systemic complications and premature mortality associated with MCS. Design of optimal next-generation MCS devices thus requires consideration of biocompatibility and blood-device interactions to minimize potential blood complications and promote clinical success. Presented herein is a contemporary understanding of “blood damage,” with emphasis on shear exposures that alter microrheological function but do not overtly destroy cells (ie, sublethal damage). Identification of key cellular factors perturbed by supraphysiological shear exposure are examined, offering potential pathways to enhance design of MCS and blood-contacting medical devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红细胞亚致死性损伤:血液相容性不是没有溶血
血液是一种复杂的流体,因为它是富含蛋白质的血浆中形成的细胞元素的两相悬浮液。血液的机械特性——尤其是红细胞(RBC)——对其在整个循环系统中分配营养物质的作用至关重要,主要决定了大流量特征和微循环流量。各种因素损害红细胞的物理特性,包括细胞衰老、许多疾病和暴露于机械力。事实上,随着现代生命支持的出现,后者变得越来越重要,如机械循环支持(MCS),它在血液和人工环境之间诱导独特的相互作用,使血细胞具有衰老的特征,尽管加速了衰老,并成为包括死亡在内的各种严重并发症的关键原因。越来越多的证据表明,这些并发症似乎与MCS内存在的机械剪切力有关,这种剪切力不足以使细胞明显破裂,但仍可能对重要血液成分造成“亚致死”损伤和“疲劳”。剪切暴露升高后红细胞物理特性受损是血液亚致死损伤的标志,这是值得注意的,至少可以部分解释多组分灭菌剂引起的系统并发症和过早死亡。因此,设计最佳的下一代多组分灭菌剂设备需要考虑生物相容性和血液设备的相互作用,以最大限度地减少潜在的血液并发症并促进临床成功。本文介绍了对“血液损伤”的当代理解,重点是改变微流变功能但不会公开破坏细胞(即亚致死损伤)的剪切暴露。研究了受超生理剪切暴露干扰的关键细胞因子的识别,为加强多组分灭菌剂和血液接触医疗设备的设计提供了潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
期刊最新文献
Single vs Double-Unit Transfusion in Patients With Hematological Disorders Undergoing Chemotherapy or Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Whole Blood Donor Iron Management Across Europe: Experiences and Challenges in Four Blood Establishments Single-Unit Transfusion Policy in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Less is Not Worse Ultra-Massive Transfusion: Predictors of Occurrence and In-Hospital mortality From the Australian and New Zealand Massive Transfusion Registry (ANZ-MTR) Beta-Amyloid Related Neurodegenerative and Neurovascular Diseases: Potential Implications for Transfusion Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1