Single vs Double-Unit Transfusion in Patients With Hematological Disorders Undergoing Chemotherapy or Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150862
Catalina Herrán-Fonseca, Laura Jekov, Carlotta Persaud, Fahad Alabbas
{"title":"Single vs Double-Unit Transfusion in Patients With Hematological Disorders Undergoing Chemotherapy or Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Catalina Herrán-Fonseca, Laura Jekov, Carlotta Persaud, Fahad Alabbas","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no consensus to support the single unit-transfusion policy (1-RBC) over the double-unit transfusion policy (2-RBC) in patients with hematological disorders undergoing chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were pooled. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager and R software. Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels at discharge (MD -0.41 g/dL; 95% CI -0.53, -0.29 g/dL; P < .01) and total RBC units used per admission (MD -0.82 units; 95% CI -1.60, -0.05 units; P = .04) were significantly lower in patients who received 1-RBC, while length of hospital stay (MD 0.05 days; 95% CI -0.29, 0.39 days; P = .89), severe bleeding (RR 1.52; 95% CI 0.85, 2.71; P = .16) and mortality (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.52, 1.53; P = .69) showed no significant difference between groups. In patients with hematological disorders undergoing chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation, 1-RBC is associated with lower Hb levels at discharge and a reduction in the total number of RBC units used per admission, with no significant difference in terms of length of hospital stay, severe bleeding risk, transfusion-related adverse events and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"150862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no consensus to support the single unit-transfusion policy (1-RBC) over the double-unit transfusion policy (2-RBC) in patients with hematological disorders undergoing chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were pooled. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager and R software. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels at discharge (MD -0.41 g/dL; 95% CI -0.53, -0.29 g/dL; P < .01) and total RBC units used per admission (MD -0.82 units; 95% CI -1.60, -0.05 units; P = .04) were significantly lower in patients who received 1-RBC, while length of hospital stay (MD 0.05 days; 95% CI -0.29, 0.39 days; P = .89), severe bleeding (RR 1.52; 95% CI 0.85, 2.71; P = .16) and mortality (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.52, 1.53; P = .69) showed no significant difference between groups. In patients with hematological disorders undergoing chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation, 1-RBC is associated with lower Hb levels at discharge and a reduction in the total number of RBC units used per admission, with no significant difference in terms of length of hospital stay, severe bleeding risk, transfusion-related adverse events and mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受化疗或干细胞移植的血液病患者的单单位输血与双单位输血:系统综述与元分析》。
对于接受化疗或干细胞移植的血液病患者,目前尚无共识支持单单位输血政策(1-RBC)而非双单位输血政策(2-RBC)。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆。对风险比(RR)和平均差(MD)进行了汇总。使用Review Manager和R软件进行统计分析。异质性采用I2统计量进行评估。接受 1-RBC 治疗的患者出院时的血红蛋白 (Hb) 水平(MD -0.41 g/dL; 95% CI -0.53, -0.29 g/dL; P < .01)和每次入院使用的 RBC 总单位(MD -0.82 单位; 95% CI -1.60, -0.05 单位; P = .04)显著降低,而住院时间(MD 0.05天;95% CI -0.29,0.39天;P = .89)、严重出血(RR 1.52;95% CI 0.85,2.71;P = .16)和死亡率(RR 0.89;95% CI 0.52,1.53;P = .69)在组间无显著差异。在接受化疗或干细胞移植的血液病患者中,1-RBC 与出院时较低的 Hb 水平和减少每次入院使用的 RBC 单位总数有关,但在住院时间、严重出血风险、输血相关不良事件和死亡率方面无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
期刊最新文献
Single vs Double-Unit Transfusion in Patients With Hematological Disorders Undergoing Chemotherapy or Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Whole Blood Donor Iron Management Across Europe: Experiences and Challenges in Four Blood Establishments Single-Unit Transfusion Policy in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Less is Not Worse Ultra-Massive Transfusion: Predictors of Occurrence and In-Hospital mortality From the Australian and New Zealand Massive Transfusion Registry (ANZ-MTR) Beta-Amyloid Related Neurodegenerative and Neurovascular Diseases: Potential Implications for Transfusion Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1