A Clinical Consensus Approach to Developing a New Funding Model for Radiation Services in Ontario.

Suzanna Apostolovski, Farzana McCallum, Carina Simniceanu, Julie Kraus, Eric Gutierrez, Brian Liszewski, Emma Esselink, Jean-Pierre Bissonnette, Margaret Hart, Michael Brundage, Padraig Warde, Jason Pantarotto
{"title":"A Clinical Consensus Approach to Developing a New Funding Model for Radiation Services in Ontario.","authors":"Suzanna Apostolovski,&nbsp;Farzana McCallum,&nbsp;Carina Simniceanu,&nbsp;Julie Kraus,&nbsp;Eric Gutierrez,&nbsp;Brian Liszewski,&nbsp;Emma Esselink,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Bissonnette,&nbsp;Margaret Hart,&nbsp;Michael Brundage,&nbsp;Padraig Warde,&nbsp;Jason Pantarotto","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2023.27146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) introduced a quality-based procedure model for the funding of radiation treatment (RT) in Ontario. This model ties reimbursement to patient care activities, ensuring equity and transparency in funding. Over 200 RT interprofessionals (oncologists, therapists and physicists) participated on 22 expert panels to establish or identify 288 evidence-based RT protocols and 672 quality expectations (QEs) to optimally deliver RT, which eventually led to the micro-costing of all protocols. Iterative review is required to ensure updated techniques and identify evolving standards of care, thereby providing the highest quality of RT care to Ontarians.</p>","PeriodicalId":39763,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"26 2","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2023.27146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2021, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) introduced a quality-based procedure model for the funding of radiation treatment (RT) in Ontario. This model ties reimbursement to patient care activities, ensuring equity and transparency in funding. Over 200 RT interprofessionals (oncologists, therapists and physicists) participated on 22 expert panels to establish or identify 288 evidence-based RT protocols and 672 quality expectations (QEs) to optimally deliver RT, which eventually led to the micro-costing of all protocols. Iterative review is required to ensure updated techniques and identify evolving standards of care, thereby providing the highest quality of RT care to Ontarians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种临床共识的方法来开发一个新的资助模式的辐射服务在安大略省。
2021年,安大略卫生部(安大略癌症护理中心)为安大略放射治疗(RT)的资助引入了基于质量的程序模型。这种模式将报销与患者护理活动联系起来,确保资金的公平性和透明度。超过200名放疗专业人士(肿瘤学家、治疗师和物理学家)参加了22个专家小组,建立或确定了288个循证放疗方案和672个质量期望(QEs),以最佳地提供放疗,最终导致所有方案的微观成本。需要进行反复审查,以确保更新技术并确定不断发展的护理标准,从而为安大略人提供最高质量的RT护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Governing boards of healthcare organizations in Canada are accountable for the performance of their organization and provide oversight on their decisions. Traditionally, many healthcare boards have focused on finances and community relations and have deferred responsibility for quality of care.
期刊最新文献
Routine Collection of Patient-Reported Data to Support the Needs of Primary Care Within an Integrated Healthcare System. Sex-Based Differences in Mental Health Service Use Between Canadian Veterans and Non-Veterans Residing in Ontario. "The Space Is as Much Yours as It Is Mine": Insights From Health System Leaders About Inclusive Leadership. A Primer on Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare Administrators. Bridge-to-Home: A Case Study of the Mutually Reinforcing Benefits of Patient Engagement-Focused Quality Improvement Initiatives for Transitions out of Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1