Self-perceived cognitive function and neuropsychological performance in women with fibromyalgia.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872022001101450
Natalia Elgueta-Aguilera, Francisco Guede-Rojas, Cristhian Mendoza, Claudio Carvajal-Parodi, Daniel Jerez-Mayorga
{"title":"Self-perceived cognitive function and neuropsychological performance in women with fibromyalgia.","authors":"Natalia Elgueta-Aguilera,&nbsp;Francisco Guede-Rojas,&nbsp;Cristhian Mendoza,&nbsp;Claudio Carvajal-Parodi,&nbsp;Daniel Jerez-Mayorga","doi":"10.4067/S0034-98872022001101450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is a common complain in patients with fibromyalgia (FM).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the perceived cognitive function and cognitive performance in women with FM.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study including 100 women with FM (FMG) and 100 healthy controls (CG). Self-perceived cognitive functioning was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognition scale (FACT-Cogv3). The neuropsychological performance was assessed with the Trail Making Test (TMT-A, TMT-B), Digit Span test (DS), Barcelona test (DS-F/B) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E), Spanish version test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores of all cognitive self-perception factors and all neuropsychological tests were lower in the FMG (p < 0.001). Over 90% of the FMG took longer than the population mean (P50) to complete the TMT-A and TMT-B tests, while in the CG, 1/3 took longer than the P50 in both tests. The minimum expected scores for the DS-F and DS-B tests were not achieved by 40 and 9% of FMG participants, respectively. According to FAB-E, 54% and 24% of FMG were categorized as fronto-subcortical deficit and fronto-subcortical dementia, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with FM have a higher perception of cognitive dysfunction and lower cognitive performance in objective tests than healthy women. More research is needed to explore the clinical, psychosocial, and sociodemographic characteristics that predispose to cognitive deficits in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21360,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022001101450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Cognitive dysfunction is a common complain in patients with fibromyalgia (FM).

Aim: To assess the perceived cognitive function and cognitive performance in women with FM.

Material and methods: Cross-sectional study including 100 women with FM (FMG) and 100 healthy controls (CG). Self-perceived cognitive functioning was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognition scale (FACT-Cogv3). The neuropsychological performance was assessed with the Trail Making Test (TMT-A, TMT-B), Digit Span test (DS), Barcelona test (DS-F/B) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E), Spanish version test.

Results: The mean scores of all cognitive self-perception factors and all neuropsychological tests were lower in the FMG (p < 0.001). Over 90% of the FMG took longer than the population mean (P50) to complete the TMT-A and TMT-B tests, while in the CG, 1/3 took longer than the P50 in both tests. The minimum expected scores for the DS-F and DS-B tests were not achieved by 40 and 9% of FMG participants, respectively. According to FAB-E, 54% and 24% of FMG were categorized as fronto-subcortical deficit and fronto-subcortical dementia, respectively.

Conclusions: Women with FM have a higher perception of cognitive dysfunction and lower cognitive performance in objective tests than healthy women. More research is needed to explore the clinical, psychosocial, and sociodemographic characteristics that predispose to cognitive deficits in this group of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维肌痛患者的自我认知功能和神经心理表现。
背景:认知功能障碍是纤维肌痛(FM)患者的常见主诉。目的:评价女性FM患者的认知功能和认知表现。材料与方法:横断面研究包括100名FM女性(FMG)和100名健康对照(CG)。使用癌症治疗认知功能评估量表(FACT-Cogv3)评估自我感知的认知功能。神经心理测试采用轨迹测验(tft - a、tft -B)、数字广度测验(DS)、巴塞罗那测验(DS- f /B)和正面评估单元(FAB-E),西班牙语版测验。结果:FMG组各认知自我知觉因子和各神经心理测试的平均得分均低于对照组(p < 0.001)。超过90%的FMG患者完成TMT-A和TMT-B测试所需时间超过总体平均值(P50),而在CG中,1/3的患者完成这两项测试所需时间超过P50。分别有40%和9%的FMG参与者没有达到DS-F和DS-B测试的最低预期分数。根据FAB-E, 54%和24%的FMG分别被归类为额皮质下缺陷和额皮质下痴呆。结论:FM患者在客观测试中对认知功能障碍的感知高于健康女性,认知表现低于健康女性。需要更多的研究来探索临床、社会心理和社会人口学特征,这些特征使这组患者易患认知缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista medica de Chile
Revista medica de Chile 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Médica de Chile publica trabajos originales sobre temas de interés médico y de Ciencias Biomédicas, dando preferencia a los relacionados con la Medicina Interna y sus especialidades derivadas. Publicada mensualmente, desde 1872, por la Sociedad Médica de Santiago. La abreviatura de su título es Rev Med Chile, que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pié de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
[Being Depressed or Having Depression. The biomedical model and the difference between mood and illness]. Chronic angina secondary to Takayasu arteritis. Report of one case. [Single-pass albumin dialysis as treatment of acute on chronic liver failure during COVID-19 pneumonia. report of one case]. [The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers]. [Knowing better, knowing the why, and knowing how to do: assumptions of depression in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1