[The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872022001101526
Valentina da Bove Rybertt, Fredyl Segue Palma, Ricardo Arteaga San Martín, Camila Antileo Pinto, Pablo Carmona Maldonado
{"title":"[The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers].","authors":"Valentina da Bove Rybertt, Fredyl Segue Palma, Ricardo Arteaga San Martín, Camila Antileo Pinto, Pablo Carmona Maldonado","doi":"10.4067/S0034-98872022001101526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical reasoning (CR) is a training mainstay in health care careers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the perception of students and teachers about the development of clinical CR in Kinesiology and Dentistry careers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Exploratory descriptive qualitative study, with 12 informants (six teachers and six students), applying a script of questions through a semi-structured interview. A thematic inductive data analysis was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-five meaning units, 38 codes, seven subcategories and three categories were collected. CR was reported as a basic analysis process in health care training. Its necessary elements are knowledge, a learning environment and a facilitator teacher, among others. Motivation, analysis models, variability and exposure are reported as facilitating factors for the development of CR. Teacher paternalism, resistance to change and few learning opportunities are presented as obstacles. Active strategies such as clinical cases, simulation and clinical practice are perceived as facilitators for the development of CR. Those situations where the student does not assume a leading role such as lectures and activities in large groups, are considered as obstacles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both students and teachers point to CR as an analysis process that is indispensable in both careers. Exposure to variable educational experiences through active educational strategies in small groups encourages CR.</p>","PeriodicalId":21360,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022001101526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical reasoning (CR) is a training mainstay in health care careers.

Aim: To describe the perception of students and teachers about the development of clinical CR in Kinesiology and Dentistry careers.

Material and methods: Exploratory descriptive qualitative study, with 12 informants (six teachers and six students), applying a script of questions through a semi-structured interview. A thematic inductive data analysis was carried out.

Results: Two hundred thirty-five meaning units, 38 codes, seven subcategories and three categories were collected. CR was reported as a basic analysis process in health care training. Its necessary elements are knowledge, a learning environment and a facilitator teacher, among others. Motivation, analysis models, variability and exposure are reported as facilitating factors for the development of CR. Teacher paternalism, resistance to change and few learning opportunities are presented as obstacles. Active strategies such as clinical cases, simulation and clinical practice are perceived as facilitators for the development of CR. Those situations where the student does not assume a leading role such as lectures and activities in large groups, are considered as obstacles.

Conclusions: Both students and teachers point to CR as an analysis process that is indispensable in both careers. Exposure to variable educational experiences through active educational strategies in small groups encourages CR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[教师和学生对卫生保健职业临床推理的看法]。
背景:临床推理(CR)是卫生保健职业培训的主要内容。目的:描述学生和教师对运动机能学和牙科职业临床CR发展的看法。材料和方法:探索性描述性定性研究,有12名被调查者(6名教师和6名学生),通过半结构化访谈应用问题脚本。进行了专题归纳数据分析。结果:收集到235个意义单位,38个代码,7个小类,3个大类。CR被认为是卫生保健培训的基本分析过程。它的必要要素是知识、学习环境和辅导员等。动机、分析模型、可变性和暴露被认为是促进社会责任发展的因素。教师家长式作风、抗拒变革和学习机会少被认为是障碍。积极的策略,如临床案例、模拟和临床实践,被认为是促进CR发展的因素。那些学生不承担主导作用的情况,如讲座和大型团体活动,被认为是障碍。结论:学生和教师都指出,在这两个职业中,企业责任是一个不可缺少的分析过程。在小组中通过积极的教育策略接触不同的教育经历,可以鼓励CR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista medica de Chile
Revista medica de Chile 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Médica de Chile publica trabajos originales sobre temas de interés médico y de Ciencias Biomédicas, dando preferencia a los relacionados con la Medicina Interna y sus especialidades derivadas. Publicada mensualmente, desde 1872, por la Sociedad Médica de Santiago. La abreviatura de su título es Rev Med Chile, que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pié de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
[Being Depressed or Having Depression. The biomedical model and the difference between mood and illness]. Chronic angina secondary to Takayasu arteritis. Report of one case. [Single-pass albumin dialysis as treatment of acute on chronic liver failure during COVID-19 pneumonia. report of one case]. [The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers]. [Knowing better, knowing the why, and knowing how to do: assumptions of depression in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1