Comparative Analysis of Single-Path and Multipath Adrenal Venous Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/8670365
Zhoufei Fang, Han Cai, Qixiang Zhang, Jin Gong, Wei Zhou, Liangdi Xie, Feng Peng
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Single-Path and Multipath Adrenal Venous Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism.","authors":"Zhoufei Fang,&nbsp;Han Cai,&nbsp;Qixiang Zhang,&nbsp;Jin Gong,&nbsp;Wei Zhou,&nbsp;Liangdi Xie,&nbsp;Feng Peng","doi":"10.1155/2023/8670365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) via the cubital vein and femoral vein synchronously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 patients with primary aldosteronism admitted to the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University were enrolled and randomly divided into a single-path AVS group (SP, <i>N</i> = 108) and a multipath AVS group (MP, <i>N</i> = 92). We analyzed the clinical characteristics, intubation success rate, procedure cost, total fluoroscopy time, complications, contrast dosage, and the number of catheters selected during AVS. A planar quadrant system was established to mark the direction of the adrenal opening, with the intersection of the right renal vein and the inferior vena cava defined as the origin. In digital subtraction angiography images, the RAV opening located in the 0-3 o'clock direction was the first quadrant (I), and the 3-6 o'clock direction was the third quadrant (III).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference between the two groups at baseline. Multipath AVS had a significantly higher success rate of right-sided intubation than single-path AVS (success rate of right-sided intubation/%: SP 87.96 vs MP 95.65, <i>P</i> = 0.043). Total fluoroscopy time was significantly reduced (fluoroscopy time/min: SP 9.80 ± 4.07 vs MP 7.42 ± 3.48, <i>P</i> = 0.024) and the cost of the procedure was markedly lower (cost/yuan: SP 3,900.93 ± 1,191.12 vs MP 3,378.26 ± 399.40, <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. In the group I, the procedure was completed mainly with an MPA catheter (catheter selection/%: MPA 98.19 vs TIG 17.65, <i>P</i> < 0.001). In the group III, TIG catheters were used more frequently (catheter selection/%: MPA 1.81 vs TIG 82.35, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multipath AVS via the cubital vein and femoral vein improves the success rate of AVS with comparable safety compared to single-path AVS. When the RAV is opened in the III quadrant, the TIG catheter improves the cannulation success rate. The multipath AVS method provides more catheter options. Patients diagnosed with PA at the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University from December 2019 to December 2021 were included. The collection of medical records of the included population was approved by the ethics committee (approval number: [2021] 311). This was a cross-sectional study in which some patients were treated surgically and some were treated with superselective adrenal artery embolization (SAAE). We conducted a cohort study of patients treated with SAAE. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) receipt release date: January 11, 2022. This trial is registered with NCT05188872.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8670365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8670365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) via the cubital vein and femoral vein synchronously.

Methods: A total of 200 patients with primary aldosteronism admitted to the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University were enrolled and randomly divided into a single-path AVS group (SP, N = 108) and a multipath AVS group (MP, N = 92). We analyzed the clinical characteristics, intubation success rate, procedure cost, total fluoroscopy time, complications, contrast dosage, and the number of catheters selected during AVS. A planar quadrant system was established to mark the direction of the adrenal opening, with the intersection of the right renal vein and the inferior vena cava defined as the origin. In digital subtraction angiography images, the RAV opening located in the 0-3 o'clock direction was the first quadrant (I), and the 3-6 o'clock direction was the third quadrant (III).

Results: There was no statistical difference between the two groups at baseline. Multipath AVS had a significantly higher success rate of right-sided intubation than single-path AVS (success rate of right-sided intubation/%: SP 87.96 vs MP 95.65, P = 0.043). Total fluoroscopy time was significantly reduced (fluoroscopy time/min: SP 9.80 ± 4.07 vs MP 7.42 ± 3.48, P = 0.024) and the cost of the procedure was markedly lower (cost/yuan: SP 3,900.93 ± 1,191.12 vs MP 3,378.26 ± 399.40, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. In the group I, the procedure was completed mainly with an MPA catheter (catheter selection/%: MPA 98.19 vs TIG 17.65, P < 0.001). In the group III, TIG catheters were used more frequently (catheter selection/%: MPA 1.81 vs TIG 82.35, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Multipath AVS via the cubital vein and femoral vein improves the success rate of AVS with comparable safety compared to single-path AVS. When the RAV is opened in the III quadrant, the TIG catheter improves the cannulation success rate. The multipath AVS method provides more catheter options. Patients diagnosed with PA at the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University from December 2019 to December 2021 were included. The collection of medical records of the included population was approved by the ethics committee (approval number: [2021] 311). This was a cross-sectional study in which some patients were treated surgically and some were treated with superselective adrenal artery embolization (SAAE). We conducted a cohort study of patients treated with SAAE. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) receipt release date: January 11, 2022. This trial is registered with NCT05188872.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性醛固酮增多症单路与多路肾上腺静脉取样的比较分析。
目的:评价肘静脉与股静脉同步肾上腺静脉采血术的安全性和有效性。方法:选取福建医科大学第一医院收治的原发性醛固酮增多症患者200例,随机分为单径AVS组(SP, N = 108)和多径AVS组(MP, N = 92)。我们分析了AVS的临床特点、插管成功率、手术费用、全透视时间、并发症、造影剂剂量和选择的导管数量。以右肾静脉与下腔静脉交点为起点,建立平面象限系统标记肾上腺开口方向。在数字减影血管造影图像中,位于0-3点钟方向的RAV开口为第一象限(I),位于3-6点钟方向的RAV开口为第三象限(III)。结果:两组在基线时无统计学差异。多径AVS右侧插管成功率明显高于单径AVS(右侧插管成功率/%:SP 87.96 vs MP 95.65, P = 0.043)。总透视时间明显缩短(透视时间/分钟:SP 9.80±4.07 vs MP 7.42±3.48,P = 0.024),手术成本明显降低(成本/元:SP 3,900.93±1,191.12 vs MP 3,378.26±399.40,P < 0.001)。两组术后并发症无明显差异。I组主要使用MPA导管完成手术(导管选择率:MPA 98.19 vs TIG 17.65, P < 0.001)。III组使用TIG导管的频率更高(导管选择/%:MPA 1.81 vs TIG 82.35, P < 0.001)。结论:与单路AVS相比,经肘静脉和股静脉的多径AVS提高了AVS的成功率,且安全性相当。当RAV在III象限打开时,TIG导管提高了插管成功率。多径AVS方法提供了更多的导管选择。纳入2019年12月至2021年12月在福建医科大学第一医院诊断为PA的患者。收集纳入人群的病历经伦理委员会批准(批准号:[2021]311)。这是一项横断面研究,其中一些患者接受手术治疗,一些患者接受超选择性肾上腺动脉栓塞(SAAE)治疗。我们对SAAE患者进行了一项队列研究。ClinicalTrials.gov方案注册和结果系统(PRS)收据发布日期:2022年1月11日。本试验注册号为NCT05188872。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019 A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study) Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1