首页 > 最新文献

Journal of interventional cardiology最新文献

英文 中文
Corrigendum to “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial”
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI: 10.1155/joic/9764137
Quan Guo, Liang Peng, Lixin Rao, Cao Ma, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Muwei Li

In the article titled “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial” [1], authors “Quan Guo and Muwei Li” were affiliated to “Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China” which is incorrect. The correct affiliation for these authors is as follows:

Department of Cardiology, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

The corrected list of affiliations is shown in the author information above.

{"title":"Corrigendum to “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial”","authors":"Quan Guo,&nbsp;Liang Peng,&nbsp;Lixin Rao,&nbsp;Cao Ma,&nbsp;Kang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhenzhou Zhao,&nbsp;Haiyu Tang,&nbsp;Muwei Li","doi":"10.1155/joic/9764137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joic/9764137","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the article titled “The “<i>L</i>-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial” [<span>1</span>], authors “Quan Guo and Muwei Li” were affiliated to “Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China” which is incorrect. The correct affiliation for these authors is as follows:</p><p>Department of Cardiology, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China</p><p>The corrected list of affiliations is shown in the author information above.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/joic/9764137","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143118604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complete Revascularization Techniques for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiography- and Coronary Physiology-Guided PCI
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1155/joic/3815312
Yanyan Zhang, Zuoyi Zhou, Bo Zheng, Yanjun Gong

Background: It is generally accepted that for patients with multivessel disease and myocardial infarction, complete revascularization is preferable than culprit-only revascularization. However, existing studies comparing coronary physiology-guided versus angiography-guided complete revascularization percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) present conflicting conclusions.

Methods: The investigation involved a comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library for studies comparing coronary physiology-guided with angiography-guided PCI in patients with MI-MVD. Clinical endpoints, including major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, major adverse cardiac and cerebral event, planned revascularization, repeated revascularization, average stent number per patient, heart failure, and contrast nephropathy during any follow-up period post PCI, were considered for analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for binary and continuous variables, respectively. The analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.1.

Results: Our analysis included a total of 2493 patients from 5 studies. The physiology-guided PCI group exhibited a lower rate of planned revascularization (OR: 0.10, 95% CIs: 0.07–0.14, p ≤ 0.001, and I2 = 96.6%) and average stent number per patient (mean difference: −0.47, 95% CIs: −0.56–−0.38, p ≤ 0.001, and I2 = 58.6%). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (OR: 0.89, 95% CIs: 0.63–1.26, p = 0.520, and I2 = 67.8%), all-cause mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CIs: 0.38–1.12, p = 0.120, and I2 = 50.5%), recurrent MI (OR: 0.74, 95% CIs: 0.28–2.00, p = 0.558, and I2 = 77.2%), major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) (OR = 0.77, 95% CIs: 0.43–1.37, p = 0.378, and I2 = 0%), repeated revascularization (OR = 1.47, 95% CIs: 0.54–3.99, p = 0.452, and I2 = 76.5%), heart failure (OR: 1.04, 95% CIs: 0.43–2.56, p = 0.924, and I2 = 0%), and contrast nephropathy (OR: 1.26, 95% CIs: 0.27–5.81, p = 0.766, and I2 = 0%).

Conclusions: Among patients with MI-MVD, physiology-guided PCI appeared to reduce the need for planned revascularization without triggering repeated revascularization, leading to fewer stents compared with angiography-guided PCI. Other prespecified clinical outcomes including MACE, all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, MACCE, heart failure, and contrast nephropathy were not significantly different between these two approaches.

{"title":"Complete Revascularization Techniques for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiography- and Coronary Physiology-Guided PCI","authors":"Yanyan Zhang,&nbsp;Zuoyi Zhou,&nbsp;Bo Zheng,&nbsp;Yanjun Gong","doi":"10.1155/joic/3815312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joic/3815312","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><b>Background:</b> It is generally accepted that for patients with multivessel disease and myocardial infarction, complete revascularization is preferable than culprit-only revascularization. However, existing studies comparing coronary physiology-guided versus angiography-guided complete revascularization percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) present conflicting conclusions.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Methods:</b> The investigation involved a comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library for studies comparing coronary physiology-guided with angiography-guided PCI in patients with MI-MVD. Clinical endpoints, including major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, major adverse cardiac and cerebral event, planned revascularization, repeated revascularization, average stent number per patient, heart failure, and contrast nephropathy during any follow-up period post PCI, were considered for analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for binary and continuous variables, respectively. The analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.1.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Results:</b> Our analysis included a total of 2493 patients from 5 studies. The physiology-guided PCI group exhibited a lower rate of planned revascularization (OR: 0.10, 95% CIs: 0.07–0.14, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 96.6%) and average stent number per patient (mean difference: −0.47, 95% CIs: −0.56–−0.38, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 58.6%). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (OR: 0.89, 95% CIs: 0.63–1.26, <i>p</i> = 0.520, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 67.8%), all-cause mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CIs: 0.38–1.12, <i>p</i> = 0.120, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 50.5%), recurrent MI (OR: 0.74, 95% CIs: 0.28–2.00, <i>p</i> = 0.558, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 77.2%), major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) (OR = 0.77, 95% CIs: 0.43–1.37, <i>p</i> = 0.378, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), repeated revascularization (OR = 1.47, 95% CIs: 0.54–3.99, <i>p</i> = 0.452, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 76.5%), heart failure (OR: 1.04, 95% CIs: 0.43–2.56, <i>p</i> = 0.924, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), and contrast nephropathy (OR: 1.26, 95% CIs: 0.27–5.81, <i>p</i> = 0.766, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p>\u0000 <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Among patients with MI-MVD, physiology-guided PCI appeared to reduce the need for planned revascularization without triggering repeated revascularization, leading to fewer stents compared with angiography-guided PCI. Other prespecified clinical outcomes including MACE, all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, MACCE, heart failure, and contrast nephropathy were not significantly different between these two approaches.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/joic/3815312","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143115145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors for Sedation Failure in Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Procedures 二尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修复手术镇静失败的预测因素
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1155/joic/1589733
Christian Frerker, Malte Mathern, Roza Saraei, Christoph Marquetand, Tobias Graf, Mulham Alhagi, Thomas Stiermaier, Florian Genske, Dominik Jurczyk, Elias Rawish, Momir Dejanovikj, Friederike Foth, Ingo Eitel, Tobias Schmidt

Background: Mitral transcatheter-edge-to-edge-repair (M-TEER) is mostly done with using general anesthesia (GA). Limited data including specific risk factors exist for a deep sedation (DS) approach.

Methods and Results: 464 M-TEER procedures were included for comparison of a DS approach versus those who required a conversion to GA. Specific predefined risk factors were analyzed to identify those patients who might not benefit from a DS strategy by the need of conversion to GA. The conversion rate from DS to GA was 6.7% (n = 433 successful DS and n = 31 conversion to GA). Mean age was 80 years. Classical surgical risk scores did not show any significant difference between the two groups. Patients with DS had a higher procedural success rate (96.1% versus 80.1%; p < 0.001). The time on the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.9 h versus 126 h; p = 0.023) was shorter for patients with DS. Patients who were in the need for a conversion to GA had a lower 30-day and 1-year survival rate. A multivariate analysis for conversion to GA showed body mass index (p = 0.023), pre-existing kidney failure (p < 0.001), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) (p = 0.031), systolic pulmonary pressure value (p = 0.013), and concomitant tricuspid regurgitation (p = 0.049) as risk factors.

Conclusions: Using DS in M-TEER is feasible with a low conversion rate to GA. In case of a conversion, the procedure is less successful regarding reduction of MR and more complications occurred with a lower survival rate up to 12 months. These data suggest that conversion from DS to GA is high risk. Therefore, we could identify different predictors for the need of a conversion to GA. However, our results could only be hypothesis-generated and should be evaluated in a randomized study.

背景:二尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修复(M-TEER)大多在全身麻醉(GA)下完成。有限的数据包括深度镇静(DS)方法的具体危险因素。方法和结果:纳入464例M-TEER手术,比较DS入路与需要转换为GA入路的患者。分析了特定的预定义风险因素,以确定那些可能因需要转换为GA而无法从DS策略中获益的患者。从DS到GA的转化率为6.7% (n = 433例成功转化为DS, n = 31例转化为GA)。平均年龄为80岁。经典手术风险评分在两组之间没有显着差异。退行性椎体滑移患者的手术成功率更高(96.1%比80.1%;p & lt;0.001)。重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(3.9 h vs 126 h;p = 0.023)。需要转换为GA的患者有较低的30天和1年生存率。多变量分析显示体重指数(p = 0.023)、既往肾衰竭(p <;0.001)、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS) (p = 0.031)、肺收缩压值(p = 0.013)和合并三尖瓣反流(p = 0.049)是危险因素。结论:在M-TEER中使用DS是可行的,但其对GA的转化率较低。在转换的情况下,手术在降低MR方面不太成功,并且发生了更多并发症,生存率低至12个月。这些数据表明,从DS到GA的转换是高风险的。因此,我们可以识别需要转换为遗传算法的不同预测因子。然而,我们的结果只能是假设产生的,应该在随机研究中进行评估。
{"title":"Predictors for Sedation Failure in Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Procedures","authors":"Christian Frerker,&nbsp;Malte Mathern,&nbsp;Roza Saraei,&nbsp;Christoph Marquetand,&nbsp;Tobias Graf,&nbsp;Mulham Alhagi,&nbsp;Thomas Stiermaier,&nbsp;Florian Genske,&nbsp;Dominik Jurczyk,&nbsp;Elias Rawish,&nbsp;Momir Dejanovikj,&nbsp;Friederike Foth,&nbsp;Ingo Eitel,&nbsp;Tobias Schmidt","doi":"10.1155/joic/1589733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joic/1589733","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><b>Background:</b> Mitral transcatheter-edge-to-edge-repair (M-TEER) is mostly done with using general anesthesia (GA). Limited data including specific risk factors exist for a deep sedation (DS) approach.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Methods and Results:</b> 464 M-TEER procedures were included for comparison of a DS approach versus those who required a conversion to GA. Specific predefined risk factors were analyzed to identify those patients who might not benefit from a DS strategy by the need of conversion to GA. The conversion rate from DS to GA was 6.7% (<i>n</i> = 433 successful DS and <i>n</i> = 31 conversion to GA). Mean age was 80 years. Classical surgical risk scores did not show any significant difference between the two groups. Patients with DS had a higher procedural success rate (96.1% versus 80.1%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The time on the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.9 h versus 126 h; <i>p</i> = 0.023) was shorter for patients with DS. Patients who were in the need for a conversion to GA had a lower 30-day and 1-year survival rate. A multivariate analysis for conversion to GA showed body mass index (<i>p</i> = 0.023), pre-existing kidney failure (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) (<i>p</i> = 0.031), systolic pulmonary pressure value (<i>p</i> = 0.013), and concomitant tricuspid regurgitation (<i>p</i> = 0.049) as risk factors.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Using DS in M-TEER is feasible with a low conversion rate to GA. In case of a conversion, the procedure is less successful regarding reduction of MR and more complications occurred with a lower survival rate up to 12 months. These data suggest that conversion from DS to GA is high risk. Therefore, we could identify different predictors for the need of a conversion to GA. However, our results could only be hypothesis-generated and should be evaluated in a randomized study.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/joic/1589733","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Impella 5.5 用于心源性休克患者升级和除颤的单中心经验
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1155/joic/7044608
Ioana Dumitru, Debbie Rinde-Hoffman, Maria Sevillano, Leeandra Schnell, Elizabeth Quintilliani, Swaroop Bommareddi

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are a critical component for treating patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). We analyzed use of Impella 5.5 device for efficacy and safety in a single-center CS population from February 2022 and April 2023. Thirty-six CS patients received Impella 5.5 support for a median duration of 16 (2, 63) days, during a median hospital stay of 40 (4, 97) days, with an overall survival (OS) of 69%. While 18 patients received Impella 5.5 only, 11 patients received Impella 5.5 as part of a de-escalation strategy, and 7 patients escalated from Impella CP only to Impella 5.5. At the time of implant, creatinine was 1.5 (0.6, 5.2) mg/dL and normalized to 1.1 (0.6, 7.7) mg/dL at discharge. In a subset of CS transfer patients (n = 12), median duration of support was 16 (1, 31) days, duration of hospital stay was 43 (8, 88) days, and OS was 67% (8/12). Collectively, these data demonstrate that Impella 5.5 support is safe and effectively improves laboratory values and survival outcomes in both transfer and in-house patients with CS.

临时机械循环支持(tMCS)装置是治疗心源性休克(CS)患者的关键组成部分。我们分析了2022年2月至2023年4月在单中心CS人群中使用Impella 5.5装置的有效性和安全性。36例CS患者接受Impella 5.5支持,中位持续时间为16(2,63)天,中位住院时间为40(4,97)天,总生存率(OS)为69%。18名患者仅接受了Impella 5.5, 11名患者接受了Impella 5.5作为降级策略的一部分,7名患者从Impella CP仅升级到Impella 5.5。植入时,肌酐为1.5 (0.6,5.2)mg/dL,出院时正常化为1.1 (0.6,7.7)mg/dL。在一组CS转移患者(n = 12)中,中位支持时间为16(1,31)天,住院时间为43(8,88)天,OS为67%(8/12)。总的来说,这些数据表明Impella 5.5支持是安全的,并且有效地改善了转院和住院CS患者的实验室值和生存结果。
{"title":"Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients","authors":"Ioana Dumitru,&nbsp;Debbie Rinde-Hoffman,&nbsp;Maria Sevillano,&nbsp;Leeandra Schnell,&nbsp;Elizabeth Quintilliani,&nbsp;Swaroop Bommareddi","doi":"10.1155/joic/7044608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joic/7044608","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p>Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are a critical component for treating patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). We analyzed use of Impella 5.5 device for efficacy and safety in a single-center CS population from February 2022 and April 2023. Thirty-six CS patients received Impella 5.5 support for a median duration of 16 (2, 63) days, during a median hospital stay of 40 (4, 97) days, with an overall survival (OS) of 69%. While 18 patients received Impella 5.5 only, 11 patients received Impella 5.5 as part of a de-escalation strategy, and 7 patients escalated from Impella CP only to Impella 5.5. At the time of implant, creatinine was 1.5 (0.6, 5.2) mg/dL and normalized to 1.1 (0.6, 7.7) mg/dL at discharge. In a subset of CS transfer patients (<i>n</i> = 12), median duration of support was 16 (1, 31) days, duration of hospital stay was 43 (8, 88) days, and OS was 67% (8/12). Collectively, these data demonstrate that Impella 5.5 support is safe and effectively improves laboratory values and survival outcomes in both transfer and in-house patients with CS.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/joic/7044608","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019 1990-2019 年中国心力衰竭的流行趋势、病因和负担研究
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5139756
Tao Ying, Han Wang, Qiong Nie, Wei Yan, Jing Wu

Background: Despite the enormous impact of heart failure (HF) in China, there is a relative lack of research on its epidemiologic trends and burden. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the epidemiologic patterns, underlying etiology, and overall burden of HF.

Objective: This study aimed to elucidate the epidemiology, etiology, and burden of HF in China and provided a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis, including temporal trends from 1900 to 2019.

Methods: The data for this study were derived from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019. Descriptive analyses were conducted to examine the prevalence and years lived with disability (YLD) rates in China from 1990 to 2019, with variables including year, sex, and age. To illustrate the temporal trend spanning 1990 to 2019, estimated average annual percentage changes (AAPC) were calculated.

Results: In 2019, the number of prevalent HF cases in China was 18.51 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 14.97 to 23.02 million), representing 32.9% of the global prevalence. Between 1990 and 2019, the number of cases and the prevalence rates of HF in China showed an increasing trend. The age-standardized prevalence rates (ASPRs) demonstrated an overall declining trend (AAPC = −0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.19 to −0.13, p < 0.01), as did the age-standardized YLD rates (AAPC = −0.13, 95% CI: −0.16 to −0.1, p < 0.01). However, from 2017 to 2019, a gradual increase was observed (AAPC = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.47 to 1.96, p < 0.01). In the age-based analysis, individuals aged 55 years and older accounted for 88.3% of the prevalent cases. Women exhibited higher case numbers and ASPR compared to men. In the cause-based analysis, hypertensive heart disease emerged as the primary etiology of HF in China.

Conclusion: From 1990 to 2019, the ASPR and age-standardized YLD rates for HF in China demonstrated an overall decreasing trend. Nevertheless, the trend increased from 2017 to 2019, with significant variations observed by gender and age. Therefore, continued attention to the disease burden of HF in China remains essential. Healthy lifestyles are important for minimizing the prevalence of HF. In addition, it is necessary to address and reduce the incidence of hypertension from all causes to mitigate the disease burden further.

背景:尽管心力衰竭(HF)在中国影响巨大,但对其流行病学趋势和负担的研究却相对缺乏。因此,迫切需要对心力衰竭的流行病学模式、潜在病因和总体负担进行全面深入的分析。 研究目的本研究旨在阐明中国高血压的流行病学、病因学和负担,并提供全面的最新分析,包括从 1900 年到 2019 年的时间趋势。 研究方法本研究的数据来自 2019 年全球疾病负担(GBD)研究。通过描述性分析,研究了1990年至2019年中国的患病率和残疾生存年数(YLD),变量包括年份、性别和年龄。为了说明 1990 年至 2019 年的时间趋势,计算了估计的年均百分比变化(AAPC)。 结果:2019年,中国的高频患病人数为1851万(95%不确定区间[UI]:1497万至2302万),占全球患病人数的32.9%。从 1990 年到 2019 年,中国的心房颤动病例数和患病率均呈上升趋势。年龄标准化患病率(ASPRs)总体呈下降趋势(AAPC = -0.16,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.19至-0.13,p < 0.01),年龄标准化YLD率也是如此(AAPC = -0.13,95% CI:-0.16至-0.1,p < 0.01)。然而,从 2017 年到 2019 年,观察到了逐渐上升的趋势(AAPC = 1.72,95% CI:1.47 至 1.96,p <0.01)。在基于年龄的分析中,55 岁及以上人群占流行病例的 88.3%。与男性相比,女性的病例数和 ASPR 均较高。在基于病因的分析中,高血压性心脏病成为中国心房颤动的主要病因。 结论从 1990 年到 2019 年,中国心房颤动的 ASPR 和年龄标准化 YLD 率总体呈下降趋势。然而,从 2017 年到 2019 年,这一趋势有所上升,并观察到不同性别和年龄的显著差异。因此,继续关注中国的心房颤动疾病负担仍然至关重要。健康的生活方式对于最大限度地降低心房颤动的患病率非常重要。此外,有必要解决并降低各种原因引起的高血压发病率,以进一步减轻疾病负担。
{"title":"Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019","authors":"Tao Ying,&nbsp;Han Wang,&nbsp;Qiong Nie,&nbsp;Wei Yan,&nbsp;Jing Wu","doi":"10.1155/2024/5139756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5139756","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><b>Background:</b> Despite the enormous impact of heart failure (HF) in China, there is a relative lack of research on its epidemiologic trends and burden. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the epidemiologic patterns, underlying etiology, and overall burden of HF.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to elucidate the epidemiology, etiology, and burden of HF in China and provided a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis, including temporal trends from 1900 to 2019.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Methods:</b> The data for this study were derived from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019. Descriptive analyses were conducted to examine the prevalence and years lived with disability (YLD) rates in China from 1990 to 2019, with variables including year, sex, and age. To illustrate the temporal trend spanning 1990 to 2019, estimated average annual percentage changes (AAPC) were calculated.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Results:</b> In 2019, the number of prevalent HF cases in China was 18.51 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 14.97 to 23.02 million), representing 32.9% of the global prevalence. Between 1990 and 2019, the number of cases and the prevalence rates of HF in China showed an increasing trend. The age-standardized prevalence rates (ASPRs) demonstrated an overall declining trend (AAPC = −0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.19 to −0.13, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), as did the age-standardized YLD rates (AAPC = −0.13, 95% CI: −0.16 to −0.1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). However, from 2017 to 2019, a gradual increase was observed (AAPC = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.47 to 1.96, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). In the age-based analysis, individuals aged 55 years and older accounted for 88.3% of the prevalent cases. Women exhibited higher case numbers and ASPR compared to men. In the cause-based analysis, hypertensive heart disease emerged as the primary etiology of HF in China.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Conclusion:</b> From 1990 to 2019, the ASPR and age-standardized YLD rates for HF in China demonstrated an overall decreasing trend. Nevertheless, the trend increased from 2017 to 2019, with significant variations observed by gender and age. Therefore, continued attention to the disease burden of HF in China remains essential. Healthy lifestyles are important for minimizing the prevalence of HF. In addition, it is necessary to address and reduce the incidence of hypertension from all causes to mitigate the disease burden further.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5139756","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142707711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI CTO-PCI 中初级 ADR 与救助 ADR 的比较分析
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1155/2024/4501880
Lirui Yang, Tao Zhang, Gang Wang, Leisheng Ru, Lin Zhao

Objective: To compare the efficiency and safety of primary and bailout antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occluded (CTO) lesions.

Methods: Patients who underwent ADR procedures for CTO lesions were enrolled in this study and were divided into two groups (primary ADR and bailout ADR) based on the initiation of ADR during PCI. The success rate and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during hospitalization were assessed as the primary endpoints. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, wire crossing time, radiation dose, and contrast volume were considered as secondary endpoints.

Results: A total of 243 patients were enrolled in this study, with 127 patients receiving primary ADR and 116 receiving bailout ADR. No differences were found in baseline parameters between the two groups. The success rate was significantly higher in the primary ADR group compared to the bailout ADR group (89.0% versus 77.6%, respectively; p = 0.017). The incidence of in-hospital MACCE was low in both groups, with no significant differences observed between them. Procedure time, radiation dose, and contrast volume were lower in the primary ADR group compared to the bailout ADR group. Cox regression analysis revealed that primary ADR and J-CTO score ≥ 3 were independent predictors of technical success in CTO-PCI.

Conclusions: Both primary and bailout ADR are safe strategies for CTO-PCI. Primary ADR significantly improves the success rate of PCI for CTO compared to bailout ADR, with shorter operation time, lower radiation dose, and reduced contrast volume.

目的比较慢性全闭塞(CTO)病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)过程中,原发性和救助性前向夹层和再入路(ADR)的效率和安全性。 方法:本研究纳入了接受 ADR 手术治疗 CTO 病变的患者,并根据 PCI 期间启动 ADR 的情况将其分为两组(主要 ADR 组和救助 ADR 组)。成功率和住院期间的主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)作为主要终点进行评估。手术时间、透视时间、导线穿越时间、辐射剂量和造影剂用量被视为次要终点。 结果:共有 243 名患者参与了这项研究,其中 127 名患者接受了主要 ADR,116 名患者接受了备用 ADR。两组患者的基线参数无差异。初级 ADR 组的成功率明显高于救助 ADR 组(分别为 89.0% 对 77.6%;P = 0.017)。两组的院内 MACCE 发生率均较低,无明显差异。与保外 ADR 组相比,原发性 ADR 组的手术时间、放射剂量和造影剂用量更少。Cox 回归分析显示,原发性 ADR 和 J-CTO 评分≥3 是 CTO-PCI 技术成功的独立预测因素。 结论:初级 ADR 和保外 ADR 都是 CTO-PCI 的安全策略。与保外ADR相比,原发性ADR能明显提高CTO PCI的成功率,手术时间更短、辐射剂量更低、造影剂用量更少。
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI","authors":"Lirui Yang,&nbsp;Tao Zhang,&nbsp;Gang Wang,&nbsp;Leisheng Ru,&nbsp;Lin Zhao","doi":"10.1155/2024/4501880","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4501880","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the efficiency and safety of primary and bailout antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occluded (CTO) lesions.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent ADR procedures for CTO lesions were enrolled in this study and were divided into two groups (primary ADR and bailout ADR) based on the initiation of ADR during PCI. The success rate and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during hospitalization were assessed as the primary endpoints. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, wire crossing time, radiation dose, and contrast volume were considered as secondary endpoints.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 243 patients were enrolled in this study, with 127 patients receiving primary ADR and 116 receiving bailout ADR. No differences were found in baseline parameters between the two groups. The success rate was significantly higher in the primary ADR group compared to the bailout ADR group (89.0% versus 77.6%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.017). The incidence of in-hospital MACCE was low in both groups, with no significant differences observed between them. Procedure time, radiation dose, and contrast volume were lower in the primary ADR group compared to the bailout ADR group. Cox regression analysis revealed that primary ADR and J-CTO score ≥ 3 were independent predictors of technical success in CTO-PCI.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both primary and bailout ADR are safe strategies for CTO-PCI. Primary ADR significantly improves the success rate of PCI for CTO compared to bailout ADR, with shorter operation time, lower radiation dose, and reduced contrast volume.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4501880","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142579615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study) 使用 5G 网络的智能手机产生的电磁干扰对永久起搏器患者的影响(EMS5G-PPM 研究)
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI: 10.1155/2024/3550004
Treechada Wisaratapong, Nutthapong Pechaksorn, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Watchara Lohawijarn

Background: The safety of new-generation mobile phones using 5G networks in patients with modern-generation pacemakers has not been studied.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the risk of electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by a new-generation mobile phone with 5G networks when positioned at the pacemaker pocket or the contralateral ear and assess the incidence of EMI with telemetry interrogation in patients with permanent pacemakers.

Methods: We enrolled 489 patients with pacemakers from three different manufacturers. The pacemaker mode was programmed for overdrive pacing and sensing mode if an intrinsic rhythm was present. A smartphone (Samsung S21 + 5G) was placed directly over the pulse generator and right ear. The phone was tested under standby mode, 5G internet connection, and incoming and outgoing calls for each location. Real-time electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring and patient symptoms were recorded to determine the occurrence of EMI. The possibility of EMI with interrogation telemetry was also investigated.

Results: A total of 4824 tests were performed on 489 patients. Most pacemakers were dual-chamber (82%) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible systems (83%). EMI was not detected with both mobile phone positions. Interference with telemetry was demonstrated in 11.5% of patients. Almost all incidences of interference (98.2%) occurred during incoming calls. Single-chamber pacemakers, non-MRI-compatible systems, older pulse generators, older leads, and unipolar settings were significantly related to a higher incidence of interference with interrogation telemetry.

Conclusions: The risk of EMI between modern smartphones with 5G networks and pacemakers is low. Nevertheless, interference with the interrogation telemetry may still occur.

背景:使用 5G 网络的新一代移动电话对现代心脏起搏器患者的安全性尚未进行研究。 研究目的本研究旨在比较使用 5G 网络的新一代移动电话放置在心脏起搏器袋或对侧耳时产生电磁干扰(EMI)的风险,并评估永久性心脏起搏器患者在接受遥测询问时 EMI 的发生率。 研究方法我们招募了 489 名使用三个不同制造商生产的起搏器的患者。起搏器模式设定为超速起搏,如果存在内在节律,则设定为传感模式。一部智能手机(三星 S21 + 5G)被直接放置在脉冲发生器和右耳上方。手机在待机模式、5G 互联网连接以及每个位置的来电和去电情况下进行测试。对实时心电图(ECG)监测和患者症状进行了记录,以确定是否发生了 EMI。此外,还调查了讯问遥测发生 EMI 的可能性。 结果:共对 489 名患者进行了 4824 次测试。大多数起搏器为双腔(82%)或磁共振成像(MRI)兼容系统(83%)。两种手机位置均未检测到电磁干扰。11.5% 的患者出现了遥测干扰。几乎所有干扰事件(98.2%)都发生在来电时。单腔起搏器、非 MRI 兼容系统、较旧的脉冲发生器、较旧的导联和单极设置与较高的遥测干扰发生率明显相关。 结论使用 5G 网络的现代智能手机与心脏起搏器之间的电磁干扰风险很低。不过,干扰询问遥测的情况仍有可能发生。
{"title":"The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study)","authors":"Treechada Wisaratapong,&nbsp;Nutthapong Pechaksorn,&nbsp;Tippawan Liabsuetrakul,&nbsp;Watchara Lohawijarn","doi":"10.1155/2024/3550004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3550004","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><b>Background:</b> The safety of new-generation mobile phones using 5G networks in patients with modern-generation pacemakers has not been studied.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to compare the risk of electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by a new-generation mobile phone with 5G networks when positioned at the pacemaker pocket or the contralateral ear and assess the incidence of EMI with telemetry interrogation in patients with permanent pacemakers.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Methods:</b> We enrolled 489 patients with pacemakers from three different manufacturers. The pacemaker mode was programmed for overdrive pacing and sensing mode if an intrinsic rhythm was present. A smartphone (Samsung S21 + 5G) was placed directly over the pulse generator and right ear. The phone was tested under standby mode, 5G internet connection, and incoming and outgoing calls for each location. Real-time electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring and patient symptoms were recorded to determine the occurrence of EMI. The possibility of EMI with interrogation telemetry was also investigated.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 4824 tests were performed on 489 patients. Most pacemakers were dual-chamber (82%) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible systems (83%). EMI was not detected with both mobile phone positions. Interference with telemetry was demonstrated in 11.5% of patients. Almost all incidences of interference (98.2%) occurred during incoming calls. Single-chamber pacemakers, non-MRI-compatible systems, older pulse generators, older leads, and unipolar settings were significantly related to a higher incidence of interference with interrogation telemetry.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The risk of EMI between modern smartphones with 5G networks and pacemakers is low. Nevertheless, interference with the interrogation telemetry may still occur.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3550004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142525418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 经桡动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中无鞘和有鞘导引导管的比较:系统回顾与元分析
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1155/2024/2777585
Zuhair Majeed, Muhammad Haider Tariq, Arslan Ahmed, Muhammad Usama, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Abira Khan, Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa, Muhammad Faiq Umar, Mustafa Turkmani, Mohamed Abuelazm, Ubaid Khan

Introduction: The sheathless transradial (TR) technique is a novel approach that may offer potential benefits over the conventional TR approach. We aim to comprehensively investigate the safety and efficacy of sheathless versus conventional TR percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs).

Methods: We conducted comprehensive searches across PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and EMBASE until July 2023. Pooled data were reported using risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023443834.

Results: We included 11 studies with 15,392 patients. The radial artery spasm (RAS) (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: [0.09, 0.77], p = 0.02) and cross-over to the femoral site (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.81], p = 0.02) were significantly lower in the sheathless group. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) (RR: 2.84, 95% CI: [1.78, 4.54], p < 0.0001) and success rate (RR: 1.011, 95% CI: [1.004, 1.019], p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the sheathless group. Also, we did not find a significant difference between both groups in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: [0.16, 1.04], p = 0.06).

Conclusion: The sheathless TR approach showed lower rates of RAS and femoral conversion. Sheathless has a higher success rate; however, it also increased RAO. Thus, more trials are needed to confirm this technique’s long-term outcomes and complications.

简介:无鞘经桡动脉(TR)技术是一种新型方法,与传统的TR方法相比具有潜在优势。我们旨在全面研究无鞘经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与传统经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(TR)的安全性和有效性。 方法:截至 2023 年 7 月,我们在 PubMed、CENTRAL、Web of Science (WOS)、Scopus 和 EMBASE 中进行了全面检索。对于二分结果,我们使用风险比 (RR) 报告汇总数据;对于连续结果,我们使用平均差 (MD) 报告汇总数据,并给出 95% 的置信区间 (CI)。PROSPERO ID:CRD42023443834。 结果:我们纳入了 11 项研究,共 15,392 名患者。无鞘组的桡动脉痉挛(RAS)(RR:0.26,95% CI:[0.09,0.77],P = 0.02)和股动脉部位交叉(RR:0.28,95% CI:[0.10,0.81],P = 0.02)显著低于无鞘组。然而,无鞘组的桡动脉闭塞(RAO)(RR:2.84,95% CI:[1.78,4.54],p = 0.0001)和成功率(RR:1.011,95% CI:[1.004,1.019],p = 0.002)明显更高。此外,我们没有发现两组在全因死亡率上有明显差异(RR:0.41,95% CI:[0.16,1.04],P = 0.06)。 结论无鞘 TR 方法的 RAS 和股骨转换率较低。无鞘的成功率更高,但也增加了RAO。因此,需要更多的试验来证实这种技术的长期效果和并发症。
{"title":"Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Zuhair Majeed,&nbsp;Muhammad Haider Tariq,&nbsp;Arslan Ahmed,&nbsp;Muhammad Usama,&nbsp;Ahmed Mazen Amin,&nbsp;Abira Khan,&nbsp;Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa,&nbsp;Muhammad Faiq Umar,&nbsp;Mustafa Turkmani,&nbsp;Mohamed Abuelazm,&nbsp;Ubaid Khan","doi":"10.1155/2024/2777585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2777585","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><b>Introduction:</b> The sheathless transradial (TR) technique is a novel approach that may offer potential benefits over the conventional TR approach. We aim to comprehensively investigate the safety and efficacy of sheathless versus conventional TR percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs).</p>\u0000 <p><b>Methods:</b> We conducted comprehensive searches across PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and EMBASE until July 2023. Pooled data were reported using risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023443834.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Results:</b> We included 11 studies with 15,392 patients. The radial artery spasm (RAS) (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: [0.09, 0.77], <i>p</i> = 0.02) and cross-over to the femoral site (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.81], <i>p</i> = 0.02) were significantly lower in the sheathless group. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) (RR: 2.84, 95% CI: [1.78, 4.54], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and success rate (RR: 1.011, 95% CI: [1.004, 1.019], <i>p</i> = 0.002) were significantly higher in the sheathless group. Also, we did not find a significant difference between both groups in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: [0.16, 1.04], <i>p</i> = 0.06).</p>\u0000 <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The sheathless TR approach showed lower rates of RAS and femoral conversion. Sheathless has a higher success rate; however, it also increased RAO. Thus, more trials are needed to confirm this technique’s long-term outcomes and complications.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2777585","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142525111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes 使用 DynamX Sirolimus 洗脱生物适配器进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:12 个月的临床和成像结果
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1155/2024/8876443
Mark Webster, Douglas Scott, Madhav Menon, Dougal McClean, Seif El-Jack, Gerard Wilkins, Scott A. Harding

The DynamX Bioadaptor is a novel implant with uncaging elements that disengage after polymer resorption and permits restoration of vessel function, thereby potentially reducing late adverse cardiac events. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this novel implant with imaging follow-up at 6-months, the time point when the bioadaptor starts to uncage. This prospective study enrolled 44 patients with up to two de novo lesions at seven centers in New Zealand treated with the DynamX Bioadaptor. Follow-up was planned out to 12-months. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were 6-month target lesion failure (TLF) and late lumen loss. Patients presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in 49%. Lesions (n = 45) were 16.0 ± 6.7 mm long, and 2.81 ± 0.41 mm in diameter. Device and procedure success were 100%, and acute lumen gain was 1.93 ± 0.35 mm. At 6-months, median in-device late lumen loss was 0.09 mm (IQR:0.05–0.16). Measured by intravascular ultrasound, the vessel, lumen, and device area remained constant. By optical coherence tomography, 96.4% ± 5.9% of struts per lesion were covered. Out to 12-months, no TLF and no definite or probable device thrombosis were reported. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the safety and performance of the DynamX Bioadaptor with excellent 12-month clinical and 6-month imaging outcomes comparable to best-in-class drug-eluting stents (DES).

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03634020, NCT05464147, NCT04562805, and NCT04192747.

DynamX 生物适配器是一种新型植入物,它具有可在聚合物吸收后脱离的解笼元件,允许恢复血管功能,从而可能减少后期不良心脏事件。我们对这种新型植入物的安全性和有效性进行了评估,并在生物适配器开始松开的 6 个月后进行了成像随访。这项前瞻性研究在新西兰的 7 个中心招募了 44 名接受 DynamX 生物适配器治疗的患者,这些患者最多有两个新发病灶。计划随访 12 个月。主要的安全性和有效性终点是6个月靶病变失败(TLF)和晚期管腔缺损。49%的患者出现非ST段抬高型心肌梗死。病变(n = 45)长度为 16.0 ± 6.7 毫米,直径为 2.81 ± 0.41 毫米。设备和手术成功率均为 100%,急性管腔增宽为 1.93 ± 0.35 毫米。6个月后,装置内晚期管腔损失的中位数为0.09毫米(IQR:0.05-0.16)。通过血管内超声测量,血管、管腔和装置面积保持不变。通过光学相干断层扫描,每个病变的支架覆盖率为 96.4% ± 5.9%。术后 12 个月内,无 TLF 报告,无明确或可能的装置血栓形成。总之,这项研究证明了 DynamX Bioadaptor 的安全性和性能,其 12 个月的临床和 6 个月的成像结果与同类最佳药物洗脱支架 (DES) 不相上下。 试验注册:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT03634020、NCT05464147、NCT04562805 和 NCT04192747。
{"title":"Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes","authors":"Mark Webster,&nbsp;Douglas Scott,&nbsp;Madhav Menon,&nbsp;Dougal McClean,&nbsp;Seif El-Jack,&nbsp;Gerard Wilkins,&nbsp;Scott A. Harding","doi":"10.1155/2024/8876443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8876443","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p>The DynamX Bioadaptor is a novel implant with uncaging elements that disengage after polymer resorption and permits restoration of vessel function, thereby potentially reducing late adverse cardiac events. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this novel implant with imaging follow-up at 6-months, the time point when the bioadaptor starts to uncage. This prospective study enrolled 44 patients with up to two de novo lesions at seven centers in New Zealand treated with the DynamX Bioadaptor. Follow-up was planned out to 12-months. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were 6-month target lesion failure (TLF) and late lumen loss. Patients presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in 49%. Lesions (<i>n</i> = 45) were 16.0 ± 6.7 mm long, and 2.81 ± 0.41 mm in diameter. Device and procedure success were 100%, and acute lumen gain was 1.93 ± 0.35 mm. At 6-months, median in-device late lumen loss was 0.09 mm (IQR:0.05–0.16). Measured by intravascular ultrasound, the vessel, lumen, and device area remained constant. By optical coherence tomography, 96.4% ± 5.9% of struts per lesion were covered. Out to 12-months, no TLF and no definite or probable device thrombosis were reported. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the safety and performance of the DynamX Bioadaptor with excellent 12-month clinical and 6-month imaging outcomes comparable to best-in-class drug-eluting stents (DES).</p>\u0000 <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03634020, NCT05464147, NCT04562805, and NCT04192747.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8876443","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142447743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vascular Complications and Bleeding After Transfemoral TAVR With Surgical Versus Percutaneous Approach: A Contemporary Prospective Study 手术与经皮途径经股动脉 TAVR 术后的血管并发症和出血:一项当代前瞻性研究
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1155/2024/8355054
Annick Astié Dardaillon, Mariama Akodad, Fabien Huet, Pierre Alain Meunier, Thomas Gandet, Jean-Christophe Macia, Laurent Schmutz, Frederic Targosz, François Roubille, Matthieu Steinecker, Benoit Lattuca, Pierre Robert, Jean-Michel Berdeu, Guillaume Cayla, Florence Leclercq

Background: Percutaneous (PC) access has become the first-line strategy for transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but surgical cutdown (SC) may be required in selected and usually challenging cases. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SC versus echo-guided PC approach in TF TAVR.

Methods: Between November 2019 and December 2020, all patients undergoing TF TAVR were included in a prospective study. The choice of PC or SC strategy was left at operators’ discretion, according to predictable access site difficulties. The primary endpoint included all vascular complications (VCs) and all bleeding at 1-month follow-up according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.

Results: Among 225 patients, 166 (73.8%) and 59 (26.2%) underwent PC or SC approach, respectively. Median age was 82 years, EuroSCORE 2 was higher (p = 0.02), and peripheral arterial disease (p < 0.001) was more common in the SC group. Femoral access was successful in 100% in the SC group vs 97.6% in the PC group (p = 0.2). The primary endpoint was reached in 32 patients (14.2%), 5 (8.4%) in the SC group and 27 (16.2%) in the PC group (p = 0.1) with low incidence of major VC in both groups (1.7% vs 3% in the SC and PC groups respectively, p = 0.6).

Conclusion: Despite a higher risk profile of patients in the SC group, SC and PC approaches appear safe and effective in TF TAVR, with a high success rate. SC may be considered when vascular access is anticipated as complex, but this strategy might be confirmed in a randomized study.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03865043

背景:经皮(PC)入路已成为经股动脉(TF)主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的一线策略,但在某些通常具有挑战性的病例中可能需要手术切开(SC)。我们旨在比较 SC 与回声引导 PC 入路在 TF TAVR 中的有效性和安全性。 方法:在 2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,所有接受 TF TAVR 的患者都纳入了一项前瞻性研究。根据可预测的入路部位困难,由操作者自行决定选择 PC 或 SC 策略。根据瓣膜学术研究联盟-2标准,主要终点包括随访1个月时的所有血管并发症(VC)和所有出血。 结果:在 225 名患者中,分别有 166 人(73.8%)和 59 人(26.2%)采用 PC 或 SC 方法。SC组的中位年龄为82岁,EuroSCORE 2更高(p = 0.02),外周动脉疾病更常见(p < 0.001)。股骨入路成功率 SC 组为 100%,PC 组为 97.6%(p = 0.2)。有 32 名患者(14.2%)达到了主要终点,SC 组有 5 名(8.4%),PC 组有 27 名(16.2%)(P = 0.1),两组的主要 VC 发生率都很低(SC 组和 PC 组分别为 1.7% 和 3%,P = 0.6)。 结论尽管SC组患者风险较高,但SC和PC方法在TF TAVR中似乎安全有效,成功率较高。当预计血管通路较为复杂时,可考虑使用 SC,但这一策略可能需要在随机研究中得到证实。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03865043
{"title":"Vascular Complications and Bleeding After Transfemoral TAVR With Surgical Versus Percutaneous Approach: A Contemporary Prospective Study","authors":"Annick Astié Dardaillon,&nbsp;Mariama Akodad,&nbsp;Fabien Huet,&nbsp;Pierre Alain Meunier,&nbsp;Thomas Gandet,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Macia,&nbsp;Laurent Schmutz,&nbsp;Frederic Targosz,&nbsp;François Roubille,&nbsp;Matthieu Steinecker,&nbsp;Benoit Lattuca,&nbsp;Pierre Robert,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Berdeu,&nbsp;Guillaume Cayla,&nbsp;Florence Leclercq","doi":"10.1155/2024/8355054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8355054","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><b>Background:</b> Percutaneous (PC) access has become the first-line strategy for transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but surgical cutdown (SC) may be required in selected and usually challenging cases. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SC versus echo-guided PC approach in TF TAVR.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Methods:</b> Between November 2019 and December 2020, all patients undergoing TF TAVR were included in a prospective study. The choice of PC or SC strategy was left at operators’ discretion, according to predictable access site difficulties. The primary endpoint included all vascular complications (VCs) and all bleeding at 1-month follow-up according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Results:</b> Among 225 patients, 166 (73.8%) and 59 (26.2%) underwent PC or SC approach, respectively. Median age was 82 years, EuroSCORE 2 was higher (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and peripheral arterial disease (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) was more common in the SC group. Femoral access was successful in 100% in the SC group <i>vs</i> 97.6% in the PC group (<i>p</i> = 0.2). The primary endpoint was reached in 32 patients (14.2%), 5 (8.4%) in the SC group and 27 (16.2%) in the PC group (<i>p</i> = 0.1) with low incidence of major VC in both groups (1.7% vs 3% in the SC and PC groups respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.6).</p>\u0000 <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Despite a higher risk profile of patients in the SC group, SC and PC approaches appear safe and effective in TF TAVR, with a high success rate. SC may be considered when vascular access is anticipated as complex, but this strategy might be confirmed in a randomized study.</p>\u0000 <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03865043</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8355054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142435512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1