Influence of Practice Characteristics on the Adoption of Electronic Dental Records in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Healthcare Informatics Research Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4258/hir.2023.29.3.239
Irfan Adil Majid, Fazeena Karimalakuzhiyil Alikutty, Hadeel Zuhair Qadah, Kadejh Abdulsalam Kofiyh, Reema Abdulaziz D Alsaadi, Rahaf Musaad Alsubhi, Anaum Naila Irfan
{"title":"Influence of Practice Characteristics on the Adoption of Electronic Dental Records in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Irfan Adil Majid,&nbsp;Fazeena Karimalakuzhiyil Alikutty,&nbsp;Hadeel Zuhair Qadah,&nbsp;Kadejh Abdulsalam Kofiyh,&nbsp;Reema Abdulaziz D Alsaadi,&nbsp;Rahaf Musaad Alsubhi,&nbsp;Anaum Naila Irfan","doi":"10.4258/hir.2023.29.3.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The adoption of electronic dental records (EDRs) is less extensively studied than electronic medical records (EMRs) in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, a multivariate analysis was conducted to calculate the adoption of EDRs and determine the practice characteristics that influence adoption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted with 220 dental practices in Jeddah from August to December 2021. The questionnaire contained 10 items that measured the adoption of EDRs and identified the region, district, practice characteristics, and practice size. A regression analysis was used to ascertain the relationships between EDR adoption and the predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 93% of the dental practices, we surveyed in Jeddah had adopted EDRs. Public dental practices and large practices were associated with higher rates of adoption (respectively, 97.0%, p = 0.016; 97.8%, p = 0.009). The logistic regression model showed statistically significant results regarding practice characteristics, practice size, and the acceptance of insurance patients. EDR adoption was 89% less likely for private dental practices, 99% less likely for smaller dental practices (≥2 dentists), and 98% less likely in dental practices that did not treat patients with insurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study sample showed a high rate of EDR adoption. Among the participants, public practices, large practices, and practices that treat patients with insurance were the most positively inclined toward EDR adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":"29 3","pages":"239-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/5d/hir-2023-29-3-239.PMC10440202.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.3.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The adoption of electronic dental records (EDRs) is less extensively studied than electronic medical records (EMRs) in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, a multivariate analysis was conducted to calculate the adoption of EDRs and determine the practice characteristics that influence adoption.

Methods: An online survey was conducted with 220 dental practices in Jeddah from August to December 2021. The questionnaire contained 10 items that measured the adoption of EDRs and identified the region, district, practice characteristics, and practice size. A regression analysis was used to ascertain the relationships between EDR adoption and the predictor variables.

Results: About 93% of the dental practices, we surveyed in Jeddah had adopted EDRs. Public dental practices and large practices were associated with higher rates of adoption (respectively, 97.0%, p = 0.016; 97.8%, p = 0.009). The logistic regression model showed statistically significant results regarding practice characteristics, practice size, and the acceptance of insurance patients. EDR adoption was 89% less likely for private dental practices, 99% less likely for smaller dental practices (≥2 dentists), and 98% less likely in dental practices that did not treat patients with insurance.

Conclusions: Our study sample showed a high rate of EDR adoption. Among the participants, public practices, large practices, and practices that treat patients with insurance were the most positively inclined toward EDR adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实践特点对吉达、沙特阿拉伯采用电子牙科记录的影响。
目的:在沙特阿拉伯,采用电子牙科记录(EDRs)的研究不如电子医疗记录(EMRs)广泛。因此,我们进行了多变量分析来计算edr的采用率,并确定影响采用率的实践特征。方法:于2021年8月至12月对吉达220家牙科诊所进行在线调查。问卷包含10个项目,测量了电子病历的采用情况,并确定了地区、地区、实践特征和实践规模。回归分析用于确定EDR采用与预测变量之间的关系。结果:吉达市约93%的牙科诊所采用了电子病历。公立牙科诊所和大型牙科诊所的采用率较高(分别为97.0%,p = 0.016;97.8%, p = 0.009)。logistic回归模型在执业特征、执业规模、参保患者接受程度等方面均有显著的统计学意义。私人牙科诊所采用EDR的可能性低89%,小型牙科诊所(≥2名牙医)采用EDR的可能性低99%,没有为患者提供保险的牙科诊所采用EDR的可能性低98%。结论:我们的研究样本显示EDR的采用率很高。在参与者中,公共实践、大型实践和治疗有保险患者的实践最积极地倾向于采用电子病历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Informatics Research
Healthcare Informatics Research MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Implementation of the Digital Health Approach to Support Learning for Health Students Based on Bloom's Taxonomy: A Systematic Review. Mapping Drug Terms via Integration of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation Algorithm with a Large Language Model. Milestones and Growth: The 30-Year Journey of Healthcare Informatics Research. Mobile Application for Digital Health Coaching in the Self-Management of Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Development and Usability Study. Nursing Records Regarding Decision-Making in Cancer Supportive Care: A Retrospective Study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1