The Floating Signifier of 'Safety': Correctional Officer Perspectives on COVID-19 Restrictions, Legitimacy and Prison Order.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY British Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2022-11-12 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1093/bjc/azac088
William J Schultz, Rosemary Ricciardelli
{"title":"The Floating Signifier of 'Safety': Correctional Officer Perspectives on COVID-19 Restrictions, Legitimacy and Prison Order.","authors":"William J Schultz, Rosemary Ricciardelli","doi":"10.1093/bjc/azac088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect prisons internationally. Existing research focuses on infection data, meaning we do not fully understand how COVID-19 shapes frontline prison dynamics. We draw on qualitative interviews with 21 Canadian federal correctional officers, exploring how the pandemic impacted prison management. Officers suggested inconsistent messaging around COVID-19 protocols reduced institutional and officers' self-legitimacy, fracturing trust relationships with incarcerated people. Furthermore, officers suggest that personal protective equipment such as gowns and face shields took on multiple meanings. We use Lévi-Strauss' floating signifier concept to analyse how individual definitions of 'safety' informed day-to-day prison routines. We conclude by arguing that legitimacy deficits and contested definitions of 'safety' will continue to create uncertainty, impacting prison operations going forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":48244,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Criminology","volume":"63 5","pages":"1237-1254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect prisons internationally. Existing research focuses on infection data, meaning we do not fully understand how COVID-19 shapes frontline prison dynamics. We draw on qualitative interviews with 21 Canadian federal correctional officers, exploring how the pandemic impacted prison management. Officers suggested inconsistent messaging around COVID-19 protocols reduced institutional and officers' self-legitimacy, fracturing trust relationships with incarcerated people. Furthermore, officers suggest that personal protective equipment such as gowns and face shields took on multiple meanings. We use Lévi-Strauss' floating signifier concept to analyse how individual definitions of 'safety' informed day-to-day prison routines. We conclude by arguing that legitimacy deficits and contested definitions of 'safety' will continue to create uncertainty, impacting prison operations going forward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“安全”的浮动符号:狱警对COVID-19限制、合法性和监狱秩序的看法。
COVID-19大流行继续影响着全球的监狱。现有的研究侧重于感染数据,这意味着我们并不完全了解COVID-19如何影响一线监狱的动态。我们对21名加拿大联邦狱警进行了定性访谈,探讨疫情对监狱管理的影响。官员们表示,围绕COVID-19协议的不一致信息降低了机构和官员的自我合法性,破坏了与被监禁者的信任关系。此外,官员们表示,个人防护装备,如长袍和面罩,有多重含义。我们使用lsamvi - strauss的浮动能指概念来分析个人对“安全”的定义是如何影响日常监狱程序的。我们的结论是,合法性缺陷和有争议的“安全”定义将继续造成不确定性,影响监狱未来的运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Criminology
British Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Criminology: An International Review of Crime and Society is one of the world"s top criminology journals. It publishes work of the highest quality from around the world and across all areas of criminology. BJC is a valuable resource for academics and researchers in crime, whether they be from criminology, sociology, anthropology, psychology, law, economics, politics or social work, and for professionals concerned with crime, law, criminal justice, politics, and penology. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed articles, BJC contains a substantial book review section.
期刊最新文献
Policing and Sense of Place: ‘Shallow’ and ‘Deep’ Security in an English Town Working Through Desistance: Employment in Women’s Identity and Relational Desistance ‘Robocops’ in the Making: Reframing Police–Citizen Interactions Through the Lens of Body-Worn Cameras Building Trust and Honouring Agreements in the Supply of Protected Wildlife Products Making Good?: A Study of How Senior Penal Policy Makers Narrate Policy Reversal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1