Development and Validation of a Holistically Based Follow-Up Pain Assessment Diary Leading to Holistic Nursing for Patients with Cancer Pain in Sri Lanka.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING Journal of Holistic Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1177/08980101231193942
N P Edirisinghe, P T R Makuloluwa, A A T D Amarasekara, G L S N Perera, C S E Goonewardena
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Holistically Based Follow-Up Pain Assessment Diary Leading to Holistic Nursing for Patients with Cancer Pain in Sri Lanka.","authors":"N P Edirisinghe, P T R Makuloluwa, A A T D Amarasekara, G L S N Perera, C S E Goonewardena","doi":"10.1177/08980101231193942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose of the study:</b> The study aimed to develop and validate a holistically based follow-up pain assessment diary for patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka. <b>Design of the study:</b> Mixed-method design adapted. <b>Methods used:</b> Developing a pain diary and testing its psychometric qualities were done in two phases. Comprehensive literature research and qualitative semistructured interviews with patients, clinical, and subject specialists created the pain diary items. Content, face, construct, criterion validity, and reliability were evaluated. <b>Findings:</b> The essential domains to be assessed were identified under six main categories; pain and related characteristics, physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and financial aspects. The average variance extracted from the subscales \"Influence on daily life,\" \"Gastric disturbances,\" and \"Pain intensity\" were 0.526, 0.562, and 0.696, respectively. The heterotrait-monotrait criterion values between subscales were from 0.691 to 0.44, which was lower than the threshold. Good to excellent correlation coefficients were demonstrated with the scores of reference tools. Cronbach's alpha was computed for each subscale and ranged from 0.75 to 0.92 and composite reliability from 0.921 to 0.826. <b>Conclusions:</b> Pain diary is a reliable and valid instrument for follow-up assessment of holistic pain experience enabling holistic nursing among patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101231193942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The study aimed to develop and validate a holistically based follow-up pain assessment diary for patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka. Design of the study: Mixed-method design adapted. Methods used: Developing a pain diary and testing its psychometric qualities were done in two phases. Comprehensive literature research and qualitative semistructured interviews with patients, clinical, and subject specialists created the pain diary items. Content, face, construct, criterion validity, and reliability were evaluated. Findings: The essential domains to be assessed were identified under six main categories; pain and related characteristics, physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and financial aspects. The average variance extracted from the subscales "Influence on daily life," "Gastric disturbances," and "Pain intensity" were 0.526, 0.562, and 0.696, respectively. The heterotrait-monotrait criterion values between subscales were from 0.691 to 0.44, which was lower than the threshold. Good to excellent correlation coefficients were demonstrated with the scores of reference tools. Cronbach's alpha was computed for each subscale and ranged from 0.75 to 0.92 and composite reliability from 0.921 to 0.826. Conclusions: Pain diary is a reliable and valid instrument for follow-up assessment of holistic pain experience enabling holistic nursing among patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证基于整体的随访疼痛评估日记,为斯里兰卡癌症疼痛患者提供整体护理。
研究目的本研究旨在为斯里兰卡的癌痛患者开发并验证基于整体的随访疼痛评估日记。研究设计:采用混合方法设计。采用的方法开发疼痛日记和测试其心理测量质量分两个阶段进行。通过全面的文献研究以及与患者、临床和学科专家进行的半结构式定性访谈,创建了疼痛日记项目。对内容有效性、表面有效性、结构有效性、标准有效性和可靠性进行了评估。研究结果需要评估的基本领域分为六大类:疼痛及相关特征、生理、心理、社会、精神和经济方面。从 "对日常生活的影响"、"胃部不适 "和 "疼痛强度 "三个子量表中提取的平均方差分别为 0.526、0.562 和 0.696。各分量表之间的异质-单质标准值在 0.691 至 0.44 之间,低于临界值。与参考工具得分之间的相关系数为良好到极佳。每个分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.75 至 0.92,综合信度为 0.921 至 0.826。结论疼痛日记是一种可靠、有效的工具,可用于对斯里兰卡癌痛患者的整体疼痛体验进行随访评估,从而实现整体护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Mindfulness Practices for Effectiveness of Stress and Burnout Reduction in Healthcare Staff. Innovative Complementary Cooling Intervention for Women's Multiple Sclerosis Symptoms: A Mixed-Methods Study. Corrigendum to "Forgiveness and Religiosity Among Nurses: A Correlational Descriptive Study". The Effect of Forgiveness and Resilience on Anxiety, Depression and Stress in Nursing Students. Effects of the Vitality Acupunch Exercise Program on Older Adults With Probable Sarcopenia: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1