Recovery trajectories of IQ after pediatric TBI: A latent class growth modeling analysis.

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1017/S1355617723000462
Megan E Narad, Julia Smith-Paine, Amy Cassedy, Elizabeth LeBlond, H Gerry Taylor, Keith Owen Yeates, Shari L Wade
{"title":"Recovery trajectories of IQ after pediatric TBI: A latent class growth modeling analysis.","authors":"Megan E Narad, Julia Smith-Paine, Amy Cassedy, Elizabeth LeBlond, H Gerry Taylor, Keith Owen Yeates, Shari L Wade","doi":"10.1017/S1355617723000462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify latent trajectories of IQ over time after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and examine the predictive value of risk factors within and across recovery trajectories.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>206 children ages 3-7 years at injury were included: 87 TBI (23 severe, 21 moderate, 43 complicated mild) and 119 orthopedic injury (OI). We administered intelligence tests shortly after injury (1½ months), 12 months, and 6.8 years postinjury. Latent class growth modeling was used to identify latent subgroups. Separate models examined verbal and nonverbal IQ recovery trajectories following TBI versus OI. Variables included: age at injury, sex, race, socioeconomic status, injury severity, quality of the home environment, family functioning, and parenting style.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the TBI and OI analyses yielded different growth models for nonverbal (<i>k</i> = 3) and verbal IQ (<i>k</i> = 3). Although all models resulted in 3 latent classes (below average, average, and aboveaverage performance); trajectory shapes, contributors to class membership, and performance within each class varied by injury group and IQ domain. TBI severity was associated with class membership for nonverbal IQ, with less severe injuries associated with higher IQ scores; however, TBI severity did not influence verbal IQ class membership. Parenting style had a more prominent effect on verbal and nonverbal IQ within the TBI than OI trajectories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest TBI severity is related to recovery trajectories for nonverbal but not verbal IQ and parenting style has stronger effects on recovery in TBI than OI. Results highlight the importance of parental factors on long-term recovery after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"273-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723000462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify latent trajectories of IQ over time after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and examine the predictive value of risk factors within and across recovery trajectories.

Method: 206 children ages 3-7 years at injury were included: 87 TBI (23 severe, 21 moderate, 43 complicated mild) and 119 orthopedic injury (OI). We administered intelligence tests shortly after injury (1½ months), 12 months, and 6.8 years postinjury. Latent class growth modeling was used to identify latent subgroups. Separate models examined verbal and nonverbal IQ recovery trajectories following TBI versus OI. Variables included: age at injury, sex, race, socioeconomic status, injury severity, quality of the home environment, family functioning, and parenting style.

Results: Both the TBI and OI analyses yielded different growth models for nonverbal (k = 3) and verbal IQ (k = 3). Although all models resulted in 3 latent classes (below average, average, and aboveaverage performance); trajectory shapes, contributors to class membership, and performance within each class varied by injury group and IQ domain. TBI severity was associated with class membership for nonverbal IQ, with less severe injuries associated with higher IQ scores; however, TBI severity did not influence verbal IQ class membership. Parenting style had a more prominent effect on verbal and nonverbal IQ within the TBI than OI trajectories.

Conclusions: Findings suggest TBI severity is related to recovery trajectories for nonverbal but not verbal IQ and parenting style has stronger effects on recovery in TBI than OI. Results highlight the importance of parental factors on long-term recovery after TBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿创伤性脑损伤后智商的恢复轨迹:潜类增长模型分析
目的方法:纳入 206 名受伤时年龄为 3-7 岁的儿童:方法:纳入206名受伤时年龄为3-7岁的儿童:87名创伤性脑损伤儿童(23名重度、21名中度、43名复杂轻度)和119名矫形损伤儿童(OI)。我们在受伤后不久(1个半月)、12个月和6.8年分别进行了智力测试。我们使用潜类增长模型来识别潜伏亚组。不同的模型分别研究了创伤性脑损伤和开放性脑损伤后言语和非言语智商的恢复轨迹。变量包括:受伤年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位、受伤严重程度、家庭环境质量、家庭功能和养育方式:对创伤性脑损伤和创伤性脑损伤的分析得出了不同的非言语智商(k = 3)和言语智商(k = 3)增长模型。尽管所有模型都产生了 3 个潜在类别(低于平均水平、平均水平和高于平均水平),但每个类别的轨迹形状、类别成员的贡献者以及每个类别内的表现都因损伤组别和智商领域而异。创伤性脑损伤的严重程度与非语言智商的类别成员资格有关,受伤较轻的人智商得分较高;但是,创伤性脑损伤的严重程度并不影响语言智商的类别成员资格。在创伤性脑损伤轨迹中,养育方式对言语和非言语智商的影响比开放性损伤轨迹更为显著:研究结果表明,创伤性脑损伤的严重程度与非言语智商的恢复轨迹有关,但与言语智商无关,而养育方式对创伤性脑损伤患者恢复的影响要强于创伤性脑损伤患者。研究结果凸显了父母因素对创伤性脑损伤后长期康复的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial direct current stimulation for obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and CONSORT evaluation. Traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, and vascular risk are independently associated with white matter aging in Vietnam-Era veterans. The prefrontal cortex, but not the medial temporal lobe, is associated with episodic memory in middle-aged persons with HIV. Simplifying Complex Figure scoring: Data from the Emory Healthy Brain Study and initial clinical validation. Optimal functioning after early mild traumatic brain injury: Evolution and predictors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1