Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000602
Peta E Green, Andrea M Loftus, Rebecca A Anderson
Methods: This systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023426005) and the data collected in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of reporting of included studies was evaluated in accordance with the CONSORT statement.
Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials were identified. Evaluation of the reviewed studies revealed low levels of overall compliance with the CONSORT statement highlighting the need for improved reporting. Key areas included insufficient information about - the intervention (for replicability), participant flow, recruitment, and treatment effect sizes. Study discussions did not fully consider limitations and generalizability, and the discussion/interpretation of the findings were often incongruent with the results and therefore misleading. Only two studies reported a significant difference between sham and active tDCS for OCD outcomes, with small effect sizes noted.
Conclusions: The variability in protocols, lack of consistency in procedures, combined with limited significant findings, makes it difficult to draw any meaningful conclusions about the effectiveness of tDCS for OCD. Future studies need to be appropriately powered, empirically driven, randomized sham-controlled clinical trials.
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation for obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and CONSORT evaluation.","authors":"Peta E Green, Andrea M Loftus, Rebecca A Anderson","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000602","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1355617724000602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023426005) and the data collected in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of reporting of included studies was evaluated in accordance with the CONSORT statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven randomized controlled trials were identified. Evaluation of the reviewed studies revealed low levels of overall compliance with the CONSORT statement highlighting the need for improved reporting. Key areas included insufficient information about - the intervention (for replicability), participant flow, recruitment, and treatment effect sizes. Study discussions did not fully consider limitations and generalizability, and the discussion/interpretation of the findings were often incongruent with the results and therefore misleading. Only two studies reported a significant difference between sham and active tDCS for OCD outcomes, with small effect sizes noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The variability in protocols, lack of consistency in procedures, combined with limited significant findings, makes it difficult to draw any meaningful conclusions about the effectiveness of tDCS for OCD. Future studies need to be appropriately powered, empirically driven, randomized sham-controlled clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000626
Makenna B McGill, Alexandra L Clark, David M Schnyer
Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI), mental health conditions (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), and vascular comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) are highly prevalent in the Veteran population and may exacerbate age-related changes to cerebral white matter (WM). Our study examined (1) relationships between health conditions-TBI history, PTSD, and vascular risk-and cerebral WM micro- and macrostructure, and (2) associations between WM measures and cognition.
Method: We analyzed diffusion tensor images from 183 older male Veterans (mean age = 69.18; SD = 3.61) with (n = 95) and without (n = 88) a history of TBI using tractography. Generalized linear models examined associations between health conditions and diffusion metrics. Total WM hyperintensity (WMH) volume was calculated from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Robust regression examined associations between health conditions and WMH volume. Finally, elastic net regularized regression examined associations between WM measures and cognitive performance.
Results: Veterans with and without TBI did not differ in severity of PTSD or vascular risk (p's >0.05). TBI history, PTSD, and vascular risk were independently associated with poorer WM microstructural organization (p's <0.5, corrected), however the effects of vascular risk were more numerous and widespread. Vascular risk was positively associated with WMH volume (p = 0.004, β=0.200, R2 = 0.034). Higher WMH volume predicted poorer processing speed (R2 = 0.052).
Conclusions: Relative to TBI history and PTSD, vascular risk may be more robustly associated with WM micro- and macrostructure. Furthermore, greater WMH burden is associated with poorer processing speed. Our study supports the importance of vascular health interventions in mitigating negative brain aging outcomes in Veterans.
{"title":"Traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, and vascular risk are independently associated with white matter aging in Vietnam-Era veterans.","authors":"Makenna B McGill, Alexandra L Clark, David M Schnyer","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000626","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1355617724000626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI), mental health conditions (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), and vascular comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) are highly prevalent in the Veteran population and may exacerbate age-related changes to cerebral white matter (WM). Our study examined (1) relationships between health conditions-TBI history, PTSD, and vascular risk-and cerebral WM micro- and macrostructure, and (2) associations between WM measures and cognition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed diffusion tensor images from 183 older male Veterans (mean age = 69.18; SD = 3.61) with (<i>n</i> = 95) and without (<i>n</i> = 88) a history of TBI using tractography. Generalized linear models examined associations between health conditions and diffusion metrics. Total WM hyperintensity (WMH) volume was calculated from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Robust regression examined associations between health conditions and WMH volume. Finally, elastic net regularized regression examined associations between WM measures and cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans with and without TBI did not differ in severity of PTSD or vascular risk (p's >0.05). TBI history, PTSD, and vascular risk were independently associated with poorer WM microstructural organization (p's <0.5, corrected), however the effects of vascular risk were more numerous and widespread. Vascular risk was positively associated with WMH volume (<i>p</i> = 0.004, <i>β</i>=0.200, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.034). Higher WMH volume predicted poorer processing speed (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.052).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative to TBI history and PTSD, vascular risk may be more robustly associated with WM micro- and macrostructure. Furthermore, greater WMH burden is associated with poorer processing speed. Our study supports the importance of vascular health interventions in mitigating negative brain aging outcomes in Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000596
Laura M Campbell, Christine Fennema-Notestine, Erin E Sundermann, Averi Barrett, Mark W Bondi, Ronald J Ellis, Donald Franklin, Benjamin Gelman, Paul E Gilbert, Igor Grant, Robert K Heaton, David J Moore, Susan Morgello, Scott Letendre, Payal B Patel, Scott Roesch, Raeanne C Moore
Objective: Identifying persons with HIV (PWH) at increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is complicated because memory deficits are common in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and a defining feature of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI; a precursor to AD). Recognition memory deficits may be useful in differentiating these etiologies. Therefore, neuroimaging correlates of different memory deficits (i.e., recall, recognition) and their longitudinal trajectories in PWH were examined.
Design: We examined 92 PWH from the CHARTER Program, ages 45-68, without severe comorbid conditions, who received baseline structural MRI and baseline and longitudinal neuropsychological testing. Linear and logistic regression examined neuroanatomical correlates (i.e., cortical thickness and volumes of regions associated with HAND and/or AD) of memory performance at baseline and multilevel modeling examined neuroanatomical correlates of memory decline (average follow-up = 6.5 years).
Results: At baseline, thinner pars opercularis cortex was associated with impaired recognition (p = 0.012; p = 0.060 after correcting for multiple comparisons). Worse delayed recall was associated with thinner pars opercularis (p = 0.001) and thinner rostral middle frontal cortex (p = 0.006) cross sectionally even after correcting for multiple comparisons. Delayed recall and recognition were not associated with medial temporal lobe (MTL), basal ganglia, or other prefrontal structures. Recognition impairment was variable over time, and there was little decline in delayed recall. Baseline MTL and prefrontal structures were not associated with delayed recall.
Conclusions: Episodic memory was associated with prefrontal structures, and MTL and prefrontal structures did not predict memory decline. There was relative stability in memory over time. Findings suggest that episodic memory is more related to frontal structures, rather than encroaching AD pathology, in middle-aged PWH. Additional research should clarify if recognition is useful clinically to differentiate aMCI and HAND.
{"title":"The prefrontal cortex, but not the medial temporal lobe, is associated with episodic memory in middle-aged persons with HIV.","authors":"Laura M Campbell, Christine Fennema-Notestine, Erin E Sundermann, Averi Barrett, Mark W Bondi, Ronald J Ellis, Donald Franklin, Benjamin Gelman, Paul E Gilbert, Igor Grant, Robert K Heaton, David J Moore, Susan Morgello, Scott Letendre, Payal B Patel, Scott Roesch, Raeanne C Moore","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000596","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1355617724000596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identifying persons with HIV (PWH) at increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is complicated because memory deficits are common in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and a defining feature of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI; a precursor to AD). Recognition memory deficits may be useful in differentiating these etiologies. Therefore, neuroimaging correlates of different memory deficits (i.e., recall, recognition) and their longitudinal trajectories in PWH were examined.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We examined 92 PWH from the CHARTER Program, ages 45-68, without severe comorbid conditions, who received baseline structural MRI and baseline and longitudinal neuropsychological testing. Linear and logistic regression examined neuroanatomical correlates (i.e., cortical thickness and volumes of regions associated with HAND and/or AD) of memory performance at baseline and multilevel modeling examined neuroanatomical correlates of memory decline (average follow-up = 6.5 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, thinner pars opercularis cortex was associated with impaired recognition (<i>p</i> = 0.012; <i>p</i> = 0.060 after correcting for multiple comparisons). Worse delayed recall was associated with thinner pars opercularis (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and thinner rostral middle frontal cortex (<i>p</i> = 0.006) cross sectionally even after correcting for multiple comparisons. Delayed recall and recognition were not associated with medial temporal lobe (MTL), basal ganglia, or other prefrontal structures. Recognition impairment was variable over time, and there was little decline in delayed recall. Baseline MTL and prefrontal structures were not associated with delayed recall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Episodic memory was associated with prefrontal structures, and MTL and prefrontal structures did not predict memory decline. There was relative stability in memory over time. Findings suggest that episodic memory is more related to frontal structures, rather than encroaching AD pathology, in middle-aged PWH. Additional research should clarify if recognition is useful clinically to differentiate aMCI and HAND.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000584
David W Loring, Najé Simama, Katherine Sanders, Jessica R Saurman, Liping Zhao, James J Lah, Felicia C Goldstein
Objective: To introduce the Emory 10-element Complex Figure (CF) scoring system and recognition task. We evaluated the relationship between Emory CF scoring and traditional Osterrieth CF scoring approach in cognitively healthy volunteers. Additionally, a cohort of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) evaluation was assessed to compare the scoring methods in a clinical population.
Method: The study included 315 volunteers from the Emory Healthy Brain Study (EHBS) with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of 24/30 or higher. The clinical group consisted of 84 DBS candidates. Scoring time differences were analyzed in a subset of 48 DBS candidates.
Results: High correlations between scoring methods were present for non-recognition components in both cohorts (EHBS: Copy r = 0.76, Immediate r = 0.86, Delayed r = 0.85, Recognition r = 47; DBS: Copy r = 0.80, Immediate r = 0.84, Delayed Recall r = 0.85, Recognition r = 0.37). Emory CF scoring times were significantly shorter than Osterrieth times across non-recognition conditions (all p < 0.00001, individual Cohen's d: 1.4-2.4), resulting in an average time savings of 57%. DBS patients scored lower than EHBS participants across CF memory measures, with larger effect sizes for Emory CF scoring (Cohen's d range = 1.0-1.2). Emory CF scoring demonstrated better group classification in logistic regression models, improving DBS candidate classification from 16.7% to 32.1% compared to Osterrieth scoring.
Conclusions: Emory CF scoring yields results that are highly correlated with traditional Osterrieth scoring, significantly reduces scoring time burden, and demonstrates greater sensitivity to memory decline in DBS candidates. Its efficiency and sensitivity make Emory CF scoring well-suited for broader implementation in clinical research.
目的:介绍埃默里十元素复杂图形(CF)评分系统和识别任务:介绍埃默里十元素复杂图形(CF)评分系统和识别任务。我们在认知健康的志愿者中评估了 Emory CF 评分与传统 Osterrieth CF 评分方法之间的关系。此外,我们还对接受脑深部刺激(DBS)评估的一组患者进行了评估,以比较这两种评分方法在临床人群中的应用:研究对象包括埃默里健康脑研究(EHBS)中的 315 名志愿者,他们的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)得分均在 24/30 或以上。临床组包括 84 名 DBS 候选人。对 48 名 DBS 候选者的评分时间差异进行了分析:结果:两组患者的非识别部分的评分方法之间存在高度相关性(EHBS:复制 r = 0.76,即时 r = 0.86,延迟 r = 0.85,识别 r = 47;DBS:复制 r = 0.80,即时 r = 0.84,延迟回忆 r = 0.85,识别 r = 0.37)。在非识别条件下,Emory CF 评分时间明显短于 Osterrieth 时间(所有 p < 0.00001,单个 Cohen's d:1.4-2.4),平均节省时间 57%。DBS 患者在 CF 记忆测量中的得分低于 EHBS 参与者,Emory CF 评分的效应大小更大(Cohen's d 范围 = 1.0-1.2)。在逻辑回归模型中,Emory CF评分显示出更好的分组分类效果,与Osterrieth评分相比,DBS候选者的分类率从16.7%提高到32.1%:结论:Emory CF 评分与传统的 Osterrieth 评分结果高度相关,大大减少了评分时间负担,对 DBS 候选者记忆衰退的敏感性更高。Emory CF 评分的效率和灵敏度使其非常适合在临床研究中广泛应用。
{"title":"Simplifying Complex Figure scoring: Data from the Emory Healthy Brain Study and initial clinical validation.","authors":"David W Loring, Najé Simama, Katherine Sanders, Jessica R Saurman, Liping Zhao, James J Lah, Felicia C Goldstein","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To introduce the Emory 10-element Complex Figure (CF) scoring system and recognition task. We evaluated the relationship between Emory CF scoring and traditional Osterrieth CF scoring approach in cognitively healthy volunteers. Additionally, a cohort of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) evaluation was assessed to compare the scoring methods in a clinical population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 315 volunteers from the Emory Healthy Brain Study (EHBS) with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of 24/30 or higher. The clinical group consisted of 84 DBS candidates. Scoring time differences were analyzed in a subset of 48 DBS candidates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High correlations between scoring methods were present for non-recognition components in both cohorts (<i>EHBS</i>: Copy <i>r</i> = 0.76, Immediate <i>r</i> = 0.86, Delayed <i>r</i> = 0.85, Recognition <i>r</i> = 47; <i>DBS</i>: Copy <i>r</i> = 0.80, Immediate <i>r</i> = 0.84, Delayed Recall <i>r</i> = 0.85, Recognition <i>r</i> = 0.37). Emory CF scoring times were significantly shorter than Osterrieth times across non-recognition conditions (all <i>p</i> < 0.00001, individual Cohen's <i>d</i>: 1.4-2.4), resulting in an average time savings of 57%. DBS patients scored lower than EHBS participants across CF memory measures, with larger effect sizes for Emory CF scoring (Cohen's <i>d</i> range = 1.0-1.2). Emory CF scoring demonstrated better group classification in logistic regression models, improving DBS candidate classification from 16.7% to 32.1% compared to Osterrieth scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emory CF scoring yields results that are highly correlated with traditional Osterrieth scoring, significantly reduces scoring time burden, and demonstrates greater sensitivity to memory decline in DBS candidates. Its efficiency and sensitivity make Emory CF scoring well-suited for broader implementation in clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction and objectives: Early mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI or concussion sustained between 0 and 5 years old) can lead to post-concussive symptoms, behavioral changes, and cognitive difficulties. Although school-age children (6-17 years old) experience similar consequences, severe neuropsychological deficits are not common, and the majority have no persisting symptoms after one month. Thus, there may be value in focusing on what characterizes optimal functioning (or wellness) after mTBI, but this has not been explored in young children. This study documents the evolution and predictors of optimal functioning after early mTBI.
Method: Participants were 190 children aged 18 - 60 months with mTBI (n = 69), orthopedic injury (OI; n = 50), or typical development (TDC; n = 71). Optimal functioning was defined as: (1) no clinically significant behavioral problems; (2) no cognitive difficulties; (3) no persisting post-concussive symptoms; (4) average quality of life or better. Predictors related to sociodemographic, injury, child, and caregiver characteristics included number of acute symptoms, child sex, age, temperament, maternal education, parent-child attachment and interaction quality, and parenting stress.
Results: Fewer children with mTBI had optimal functioning over 6 and 18-months post-injury compared to those with OI and TDC. Higher parent-child interaction quality and lower child negative affectivity temperament independently predicted optimal functioning.
Conclusion: Children who sustain early mTBI are less likely to exhibit optimal functioning than their peers in the long-term. Parent-child interaction quality could be a potential intervention target for promoting optimal function.
{"title":"Optimal functioning after early mild traumatic brain injury: Evolution and predictors.","authors":"Olivier Aubuchon, Lara-Kim Huynh, Dominique Dupont, Marilou Séguin, Cindy Beaudoin, Annie Bernier, Miriam H Beauchamp","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000572","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000572","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Early mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI or concussion sustained between 0 and 5 years old) can lead to post-concussive symptoms, behavioral changes, and cognitive difficulties. Although school-age children (6-17 years old) experience similar consequences, severe neuropsychological deficits are not common, and the majority have no persisting symptoms after one month. Thus, there may be value in focusing on what characterizes optimal functioning (or wellness) after mTBI, but this has not been explored in young children. This study documents the evolution and predictors of optimal functioning after early mTBI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 190 children aged 18 - 60 months with mTBI (<i>n</i> = 69), orthopedic injury (OI; <i>n</i> = 50), or typical development (TDC; <i>n</i> = 71). Optimal functioning was defined as: (1) no clinically significant behavioral problems; (2) no cognitive difficulties; (3) no persisting post-concussive symptoms; (4) average quality of life or better. Predictors related to sociodemographic, injury, child, and caregiver characteristics included number of acute symptoms, child sex, age, temperament, maternal education, parent-child attachment and interaction quality, and parenting stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fewer children with mTBI had optimal functioning over 6 and 18-months post-injury compared to those with OI and TDC. Higher parent-child interaction quality and lower child negative affectivity temperament independently predicted optimal functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children who sustain early mTBI are less likely to exhibit optimal functioning than their peers in the long-term. Parent-child interaction quality could be a potential intervention target for promoting optimal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000389
Jacqueline N Kaufman, Marie Van Tubbergen, Jacobus Donders, Seth Warschausky
Objective: This study examined the validity of a visual inspection time (IT) task as a measure of processing speed (PS) in a sample of children with and without cerebral palsy (CP). IT tasks measure visualization speed without focusing on the motor response time to indicate decision making about the properties of those stimuli.
Methods: Participants were 113 children ages 8-16, including 45 with congenital CP, and 68 typically developing peers. Measures were a standard visual IT task that required dual key responding and a modified version using an assistive technology button with response option scanning. Performance on these measures was examined against traditional Wechsler PS measures (Coding, Symbol Search).
Results: IT performance shared considerable variance with traditional paper-pencil PS measures for the group with CP, but not necessarily in the typically developing group. Concurrent validity was found for both IT task versions with traditional PS measures in the group with CP. IT classification accuracy for lowered PS showed modest sensitivity and good specificity particularly for the modified IT task.
Conclusions: As measures of PS in children with CP who are unable to validly participate in traditional PS tasks, IT tasks demonstrate adequate concurrent validity and may serve as a beneficial alternative measure of PS in this population.
{"title":"Visual inspection time as an accessible measure of processing speed: A validation study in children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Jacqueline N Kaufman, Marie Van Tubbergen, Jacobus Donders, Seth Warschausky","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the validity of a visual inspection time (IT) task as a measure of processing speed (PS) in a sample of children with and without cerebral palsy (CP). IT tasks measure visualization speed without focusing on the motor response time to indicate decision making about the properties of those stimuli.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 113 children ages 8-16, including 45 with congenital CP, and 68 typically developing peers. Measures were a standard visual IT task that required dual key responding and a modified version using an assistive technology button with response option scanning. Performance on these measures was examined against traditional Wechsler PS measures (Coding, Symbol Search).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IT performance shared considerable variance with traditional paper-pencil PS measures for the group with CP, but not necessarily in the typically developing group. Concurrent validity was found for both IT task versions with traditional PS measures in the group with CP. IT classification accuracy for lowered PS showed modest sensitivity and good specificity particularly for the modified IT task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As measures of PS in children with CP who are unable to validly participate in traditional PS tasks, IT tasks demonstrate adequate concurrent validity and may serve as a beneficial alternative measure of PS in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-11DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000468
Bar Lambez, Eli Vakil, Philippe Azouvi, Claire Vallat-Azouvi
Objective: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) often leads to cognitive impairments, particularly regarding working memory (WM). This meta-analysis aims to examine the impact of TBI on WM, taking into account moderating factors which has received little attention in previous research, such as severity of injury, the different domains of Baddeley's multi-component model, and the interaction between these two factors, as well as the interaction with other domains of executive functions.
Method: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsycNET for studies with objective WM measures. Multiple meta-analyses were performed to compare the effects of TBI severity on different WM components. Twenty-four English, peer-reviewed articles, mostly cross-sectional were included.
Results: TBI significantly impairs general WM and all Baddeley's model components, most notably the Central Executive (d' = 0.74). Severity categories, mild-moderate and moderate-severe, were identified. Impairment was found across severities, with "moderate-severe" demonstrating the largest effect size (d' = 0.81). Individuals with moderate-severe TBI showed greater impairments in the Central Executive and Episodic Buffer compared to those with mild-moderate injury, whereas no such differences were found for the Phonological Loop and Visuospatial Sketchpad.
Conclusions: These findings enhance our understanding of WM deficits in varying severities of TBI, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating WM in clinical practice and intervention planning.
{"title":"Working memory multicomponent model outcomes in individuals with traumatic brain injury: Critical review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bar Lambez, Eli Vakil, Philippe Azouvi, Claire Vallat-Azouvi","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) often leads to cognitive impairments, particularly regarding working memory (WM). This meta-analysis aims to examine the impact of TBI on WM, taking into account moderating factors which has received little attention in previous research, such as severity of injury, the different domains of Baddeley's multi-component model, and the interaction between these two factors, as well as the interaction with other domains of executive functions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsycNET for studies with objective WM measures. Multiple meta-analyses were performed to compare the effects of TBI severity on different WM components. Twenty-four English, peer-reviewed articles, mostly cross-sectional were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TBI significantly impairs general WM and all Baddeley's model components, most notably the Central Executive (<i>d</i>' = 0.74). Severity categories, mild-moderate and moderate-severe, were identified. Impairment was found across severities, with \"moderate-severe\" demonstrating the largest effect size (<i>d'</i> = 0.81). Individuals with moderate-severe TBI showed greater impairments in the Central Executive and Episodic Buffer compared to those with mild-moderate injury, whereas no such differences were found for the Phonological Loop and Visuospatial Sketchpad.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings enhance our understanding of WM deficits in varying severities of TBI, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating WM in clinical practice and intervention planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000547
Alexandra L Clark, Anny Reyes, Jordana Breton, Melissa Petersen, Sid O'Bryant, Stephanie M Grasso
Objective: The present study characterized heterogeneity in the cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Latino older adults enrolled in the HABS-HD.
Methods: A total of 859 cognitively unimpaired older adults completed neuropsychological testing. Raw scores for cognitive tests were converted to z-scores adjusted for age, education, sex, and language of testing. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted for monolingual and bilingual speaker groups. A series of 2-5 class solutions were examined, and the optimal model was selected based on fit indices, posterior probabilities, proportion of sample sizes, and pattern of scores. Identified classes were compared on sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics.
Results: For the monolingual group (n = 365), a 3-class solution was optimal; this consisted of a Low Average Memory group with low average verbal memory performances on the SEVLT Total Learning and Delayed Recall trials, as well as an Average Cognition group and a High Average Cognition group. For the bilingual group (n = 494), a 3-class solution was observed to be optimal; this consisted of a Low Average Memory group, with low average verbal memory performances on the learning and delayed recall trials of Logical Memory; a Low Average Executive group, where performance on Trails A and B and Digit Substitution were the lowest; and a High Average Cognition group, where performance was generally in the high average range across most cognitive measures.
Conclusions: Cognitive class solutions differed across monolingual and bilingual groups and illustrate the need to better understand cognitive variability in linguistically diverse samples of Latino older adults.
目的:本研究描述了参加 HABS-HD 的单语和双语拉丁裔老年人认知特征的异质性:本研究描述了参加 HABS-HD 的单语和双语拉丁裔老年人认知特征的异质性:共有 859 名认知能力未受损的老年人完成了神经心理学测试。认知测试的原始分数经年龄、教育程度、性别和测试语言调整后转换为 z 分数。对单语组和双语组进行了潜在特征分析(LPA)。根据拟合指数、后验概率、样本大小比例和分数模式,对一系列 2-5 类解决方案进行了检验,并选出了最佳模型。对确定的类别进行了社会人口、社会心理和健康特征方面的比较:对于单语组(n = 365),3 个类别的解决方案是最佳的;这包括在 SEVLT 总学习和延迟回忆试验中平均口头记忆表现较低的低平均记忆组,以及平均认知组和高平均认知组。对于双语组(n = 494),观察到最佳的三类解决方案是:低平均记忆组,在逻辑记忆的学习和延迟回忆试验中的平均言语记忆表现较低;低平均执行组,在路径 A 和 B 以及数字替换中的表现最低;以及高平均认知组,在大多数认知测量中的表现通常处于高平均值范围:单语组和双语组的认知等级解决方案各不相同,说明有必要更好地了解拉丁裔老年人语言多样性样本的认知变异性。
{"title":"Heterogeneity in cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Hispanic/Latino older adults in HABS-HD.","authors":"Alexandra L Clark, Anny Reyes, Jordana Breton, Melissa Petersen, Sid O'Bryant, Stephanie M Grasso","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000547","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000547","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study characterized heterogeneity in the cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Latino older adults enrolled in the HABS-HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 859 cognitively unimpaired older adults completed neuropsychological testing. Raw scores for cognitive tests were converted to <i>z</i>-scores adjusted for age, education, sex, and language of testing. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted for monolingual and bilingual speaker groups. A series of 2-5 class solutions were examined, and the optimal model was selected based on fit indices, posterior probabilities, proportion of sample sizes, and pattern of scores. Identified classes were compared on sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the monolingual group (<i>n</i> = 365), a 3-class solution was optimal; this consisted of a <i>Low Average Memory</i> group with low average verbal memory performances on the SEVLT Total Learning and Delayed Recall trials, as well as an <i>Average Cognition</i> group and a <i>High Average Cognition</i> group. For the bilingual group (<i>n</i> = 494), a 3-class solution was observed to be optimal; this consisted of a <i>Low Average Memory</i> group, with low average verbal memory performances on the learning and delayed recall trials of Logical Memory; a <i>Low Average Executive</i> group, where performance on Trails A and B and Digit Substitution were the lowest; and a <i>High Average Cognition</i> group, where performance was generally in the high average range across most cognitive measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive class solutions differed across monolingual and bilingual groups and illustrate the need to better understand cognitive variability in linguistically diverse samples of Latino older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000432
Elke Butterbrod, Dominique M J van den Heuvel, Pia Zevenhoven, Lisa Waterink, Mardou van Leeuwenstijn, Roos J Jutten, Wiesje M van der Flier, Sietske A M Sikkes
Objective: Neuropsychological assessment through VideoTeleConferencing (VTC) can help improve access to diagnostic and follow-up care in memory clinics. This study investigated the stability of performance on VTC assessment in relation to in-person assessment using a test-retest design and explored user experiences of VTC assessment.
Materials and methods: Thirty-one patients (62 ± 6.7 years, 45% female, 58% Subjective Cognitive Decline, 42% Mild Cognitive Impairment/dementia diagnosis) were included from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort between August 2020 and February 2021. Patients underwent a face-to-face neuropsychological assessment followed by a VTC assessment using the same test protocol within 4 months. Reliability coefficients were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). For each test, the proportion of clinically relevant differences in performances between assessment modalities was calculated. User experiences of patients and neuropsychologists were assessed with questionnaires (User Satisfaction and Ease of use [USE] questionnaire and System Usability Scale [SUS]). Neuropsychologists also participated in a focus group.
Results: ICC values were moderate to excellent (0.63-0.93) for all test measures in the total sample. On all tests, most patients did not show clinically relevant performance differences between modalities. Patients and neuropsychologists reported overall positive VTC system usability, although neuropsychologists indicated in the focus group that patients without cognitive impairment required less training for the system and were more independent.
Conclusion: VTC assessment showed adequate to excellent test-retest reliability for a broad range of neuropsychological tests commonly used in practice. Assessment through VTC may be a user friendly method in the memory clinic, especially to monitor individuals at risk for future cognitive decline.
{"title":"Tele-neuropsychology in memory clinic settings: Reliability and usability of videoconference-based neuropsychological testing.","authors":"Elke Butterbrod, Dominique M J van den Heuvel, Pia Zevenhoven, Lisa Waterink, Mardou van Leeuwenstijn, Roos J Jutten, Wiesje M van der Flier, Sietske A M Sikkes","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000432","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuropsychological assessment through VideoTeleConferencing (VTC) can help improve access to diagnostic and follow-up care in memory clinics. This study investigated the stability of performance on VTC assessment in relation to in-person assessment using a test-retest design and explored user experiences of VTC assessment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-one patients (62 ± 6.7 years, 45% female, 58% Subjective Cognitive Decline, 42% Mild Cognitive Impairment/dementia diagnosis) were included from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort between August 2020 and February 2021. Patients underwent a face-to-face neuropsychological assessment followed by a VTC assessment using the same test protocol within 4 months. Reliability coefficients were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). For each test, the proportion of clinically relevant differences in performances between assessment modalities was calculated. User experiences of patients and neuropsychologists were assessed with questionnaires (User Satisfaction and Ease of use [USE] questionnaire and System Usability Scale [SUS]). Neuropsychologists also participated in a focus group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC values were moderate to excellent (0.63-0.93) for all test measures in the total sample. On all tests, most patients did not show clinically relevant performance differences between modalities. Patients and neuropsychologists reported overall positive VTC system usability, although neuropsychologists indicated in the focus group that patients without cognitive impairment required less training for the system and were more independent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VTC assessment showed adequate to excellent test-retest reliability for a broad range of neuropsychological tests commonly used in practice. Assessment through VTC may be a user friendly method in the memory clinic, especially to monitor individuals at risk for future cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-18DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000560
Julie Remaud, Jérémy Besnard, Sébastien Barbarot, Arnaud Roy
Objective: Adult patients with the genetic disease neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) frequently report social difficulties. To date, however, only two studies have explored whether these difficulties are caused by social cognition deficits, and these yielded contradictory data. The aim of the present study was to exhaustively assess social cognition abilities (emotion, theory of mind, moral reasoning, and social information processing) in adults with NF1, compared with a control group, and to explore links between social cognition and disease characteristics (mode of inheritance, severity, and visibility).
Method: We administered a social cognition battery to 20 adults with NF1 (mean age = 26.5 years, SD = 7.4) and 20 healthy adults matched for sociodemographic variables.
Results: Patients scored significantly lower than controls on emotion, theory of mind, moral reasoning, and social information processing tasks. No effects of disease characteristics were found.
Conclusions: These results appear to confirm that adults with NF1 have a social cognition weaknesses that could explain, at least in part, their social difficulties, although social abilities are not all impaired to the same extent. Regarding the impact of the disease characteristics, the patient sample seemed slightly insufficient for the power analyses performed. Thus, this exploratory study should form the basis of further research, with the objective of replicating these results with larger and more appropriately matched samples.
{"title":"Social cognition in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1.","authors":"Julie Remaud, Jérémy Besnard, Sébastien Barbarot, Arnaud Roy","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adult patients with the genetic disease neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) frequently report social difficulties. To date, however, only two studies have explored whether these difficulties are caused by social cognition deficits, and these yielded contradictory data. The aim of the present study was to exhaustively assess social cognition abilities (emotion, theory of mind, moral reasoning, and social information processing) in adults with NF1, compared with a control group, and to explore links between social cognition and disease characteristics (mode of inheritance, severity, and visibility).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We administered a social cognition battery to 20 adults with NF1 (mean age = 26.5 years, <i>SD</i> = 7.4) and 20 healthy adults matched for sociodemographic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients scored significantly lower than controls on emotion, theory of mind, moral reasoning, and social information processing tasks. No effects of disease characteristics were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results appear to confirm that adults with NF1 have a social cognition weaknesses that could explain, at least in part, their social difficulties, although social abilities are not all impaired to the same extent. Regarding the impact of the disease characteristics, the patient sample seemed slightly insufficient for the power analyses performed. Thus, this exploratory study should form the basis of further research, with the objective of replicating these results with larger and more appropriately matched samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}