Cross-linked phosphorylated RS4 wheat starch reduces glucose and insulin responses after 3 days of pre-feeding in healthy adults: an acute, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Thomas M S Wolever, Clodualdo C Maningat, Paul A Seib, Janice E Campbell, Alexandra L Jenkins
{"title":"Cross-linked phosphorylated RS4 wheat starch reduces glucose and insulin responses after 3 days of pre-feeding in healthy adults: an acute, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Thomas M S Wolever, Clodualdo C Maningat, Paul A Seib, Janice E Campbell, Alexandra L Jenkins","doi":"10.1080/09637486.2023.2236809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When this project was designed, there was no evidence that adding resistant starch to available carbohydrate (avCHO) reduced glycaemic and insulinaemic responses (GIR). We compared GIR elicited by a cookie containing cross-linked phosphorylated RS4 wheat starch (Fibersym®) (RS4<sub>XL</sub>) versus an avCHO-matched control-cookie (CC) after <i>n</i> = 15 adults had consumed RS4<sub>XL</sub> or CC daily for 3-days using a double-blind, randomised, cross-over design. The difference in glucose iAUC over 0-2 h (primary endpoint) (mmol × min/L) after RS4<sub>XL</sub>, (mean ± SEM) 106 ± 16, versus CC, 124 ± 16, was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.087). However, RS4<sub>XL</sub> reduced 0-90 min glucose iAUC (72 ± 9 vs 87 ± 9, <i>p</i> = 0.022), peak glucose concentration (6.05 ± 0.36 vs 6.57 ± 0.31 mmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.017) and 0-2 h insulin iAUC (189 ± 21 vs 246 ± 24 nmol × h/L, <i>p</i> = 0.020). These results show that RS4<sub>XL</sub> reduced postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses when added to avCHO, but do not prove that the products of its colonic fermentation are required for this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":14087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition","volume":"74 5","pages":"621-629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2023.2236809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When this project was designed, there was no evidence that adding resistant starch to available carbohydrate (avCHO) reduced glycaemic and insulinaemic responses (GIR). We compared GIR elicited by a cookie containing cross-linked phosphorylated RS4 wheat starch (Fibersym®) (RS4XL) versus an avCHO-matched control-cookie (CC) after n = 15 adults had consumed RS4XL or CC daily for 3-days using a double-blind, randomised, cross-over design. The difference in glucose iAUC over 0-2 h (primary endpoint) (mmol × min/L) after RS4XL, (mean ± SEM) 106 ± 16, versus CC, 124 ± 16, was not significant (p = 0.087). However, RS4XL reduced 0-90 min glucose iAUC (72 ± 9 vs 87 ± 9, p = 0.022), peak glucose concentration (6.05 ± 0.36 vs 6.57 ± 0.31 mmol/L, p = 0.017) and 0-2 h insulin iAUC (189 ± 21 vs 246 ± 24 nmol × h/L, p = 0.020). These results show that RS4XL reduced postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses when added to avCHO, but do not prove that the products of its colonic fermentation are required for this effect.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition is to integrate food science with nutrition. Improvement of knowledge in human nutrition should always be the final objective of submitted research. It''s an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes high quality, original research contributions to scientific knowledge. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.