A Series of Virtual Interventions for Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Feasibility Pilot Study for a Series of Personalized (N-of-1) Trials.

Harvard data science review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1162/99608f92.72cd8432
Mark Butler, Stefani D'Angelo, Melissa Kaplan, Zarrin Tashnim, Danielle Miller, Heejoon Ahn, Louise Falzon, Andrew J Dominello, Cirrus Foroughi, Thevaa Chandereng, Ken Cheung, Karina Davidson
{"title":"A Series of Virtual Interventions for Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Feasibility Pilot Study for a Series of Personalized (N-of-1) Trials.","authors":"Mark Butler, Stefani D'Angelo, Melissa Kaplan, Zarrin Tashnim, Danielle Miller, Heejoon Ahn, Louise Falzon, Andrew J Dominello, Cirrus Foroughi, Thevaa Chandereng, Ken Cheung, Karina Davidson","doi":"10.1162/99608f92.72cd8432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) affects 25% of U.S. adults and is associated with high costs due to physician visits and reduced productivity. Research shows that massage and yoga can be effective nonpharmacological treatments for CLBP, but the feasibility, scalability, individual treatment, and adverse-event heterogeneity of these treatments are unknown. The current study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a series of personalized (N-of-1) interventions for virtual delivery of massage and yoga or usual-care treatment for CLBP in 57 participants. We hypothesized that this study would provide valuable information about implementing a virtual, personalized platform for randomized controlled trials of personalized (N-of-1) interventions among individuals with CLBP. The study will do so by determining participants' ratings of usability and satisfaction with the virtual, personalized intervention delivery system and, in the long term, identifying ways to integrate these personalized trials into patient care. Of the 57 participants enrolled, two withdrew from the study and were not eligible to receive the primary outcome assessment. Thirty-seven of the remaining 55 participants (67.3%) completed satisfaction surveys comprising the System Usability Scale (SUS) and items assessing satisfaction with the components of the personalized trial. Participants rated the usability of the personalized trial as excellent (average SUS score = 85.8), 95% were satisfied with the personalized trial overall, and 100% stated they would recommend the trial to others. These results suggest that personalized trials of massage and yoga are highly feasible and acceptable to participants with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":73195,"journal":{"name":"Harvard data science review","volume":"4 SI3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard data science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.72cd8432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) affects 25% of U.S. adults and is associated with high costs due to physician visits and reduced productivity. Research shows that massage and yoga can be effective nonpharmacological treatments for CLBP, but the feasibility, scalability, individual treatment, and adverse-event heterogeneity of these treatments are unknown. The current study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a series of personalized (N-of-1) interventions for virtual delivery of massage and yoga or usual-care treatment for CLBP in 57 participants. We hypothesized that this study would provide valuable information about implementing a virtual, personalized platform for randomized controlled trials of personalized (N-of-1) interventions among individuals with CLBP. The study will do so by determining participants' ratings of usability and satisfaction with the virtual, personalized intervention delivery system and, in the long term, identifying ways to integrate these personalized trials into patient care. Of the 57 participants enrolled, two withdrew from the study and were not eligible to receive the primary outcome assessment. Thirty-seven of the remaining 55 participants (67.3%) completed satisfaction surveys comprising the System Usability Scale (SUS) and items assessing satisfaction with the components of the personalized trial. Participants rated the usability of the personalized trial as excellent (average SUS score = 85.8), 95% were satisfied with the personalized trial overall, and 100% stated they would recommend the trial to others. These results suggest that personalized trials of massage and yoga are highly feasible and acceptable to participants with CLBP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性下背痛的一系列虚拟干预:一系列个性化(N-of-1)试验的可行性试点研究。
慢性下背痛(CLBP)影响着 25% 的美国成年人,因就诊和生产率下降而产生高额费用。研究表明,按摩和瑜伽是治疗慢性下背痛的有效非药物疗法,但这些疗法的可行性、可扩展性、个体治疗和不良反应异质性尚不清楚。本研究评估了一系列个性化(N-of-1)干预措施的可行性和可接受性,这些干预措施是针对 57 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者的按摩和瑜伽虚拟治疗或常规护理治疗。我们假设,这项研究将为在慢性前列腺炎患者中实施个性化(N-of-1)干预随机对照试验的虚拟个性化平台提供有价值的信息。本研究将通过确定参与者对虚拟个性化干预实施系统的可用性和满意度的评分来实现这一目标,从长远来看,还将确定将这些个性化试验整合到患者护理中的方法。在注册的 57 名参与者中,有两人退出了研究,没有资格接受主要结果评估。其余 55 名参与者中有 37 人(67.3%)完成了满意度调查,其中包括系统可用性量表(SUS)和个性化试验各组成部分满意度评估项目。参与者将个性化试验的可用性评为优秀(SUS 平均分 = 85.8),95% 的参与者对个性化试验总体表示满意,100% 的参与者表示会向他人推荐该试验。这些结果表明,按摩和瑜伽的个性化试验对于慢性前列腺炎患者来说是非常可行和可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the prognostic utility of clinical and radiomic features for COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU: challenges and lessons learned. Rejoinder: Building a Paradigm That Allows for the Possibility of Non-Ignorable Nonresponse Resolving the Credibility Crisis: Recommendations for Improving Predictive Algorithms for Clinical Utility The Birth of a New Discipline: Data Science Education Close to Refuge: Integrating AI and Human Insights for Intervention and Prevention: A Conversation With Seema Iyer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1