Comparison of Doppler Ultrasound and Clinical Features of Patients With and Without Femoral Hernia in Lower Extremity Venous Insufficiency Patients.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Ultrasound Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000630
Ismet Mirac Cakir, Tumay Bekci, Serdar Aslan, Uluhan Eryuruk
{"title":"Comparison of Doppler Ultrasound and Clinical Features of Patients With and Without Femoral Hernia in Lower Extremity Venous Insufficiency Patients.","authors":"Ismet Mirac Cakir,&nbsp;Tumay Bekci,&nbsp;Serdar Aslan,&nbsp;Uluhan Eryuruk","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In this study, we aim to evaluate Doppler ultrasound (US) and clinical features of patients with and without femoral hernia (FH) in lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) patients.We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of 1364 limbs with the CVI suspected. Femoral hernia was detected in 32 of the limbs, and the control group was formed with 32 limbs without FH. All limbs were evaluated with Valsalva maneuver and augmentation method to detect venous reflux in FH group. Venous reflux rates in the Doppler US, venous clinical severity scores (VCSSs), and clinical classes of Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classification were compared statistically in both groups.The mean VCSS was 3.87 ± 0.74 in the FH group and 2.68 ± 0.65 in the control group, which was statistically significant ( P = 0.04). In the more severe clinical classes of Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (C4-6), the number of limbs in the FH group was higher than in the control group (8 and 4, respectively). Doppler US examinations showed venous reflux in 22 of 32 limbs in the FH group and 19 of 32 patients in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.029). In the FH group, reflux could be shown only by augmentation method in the vast majority of limbs (16 of 22, 73%).In conclusion, VCSS and reflux rates are higher in limbs with CVI accompanied by FH. In addition, FH may cause false negative results in the evaluation of CVI. The use of augmentation method in limbs with FH can help avoid false negatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, we aim to evaluate Doppler ultrasound (US) and clinical features of patients with and without femoral hernia (FH) in lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) patients.We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of 1364 limbs with the CVI suspected. Femoral hernia was detected in 32 of the limbs, and the control group was formed with 32 limbs without FH. All limbs were evaluated with Valsalva maneuver and augmentation method to detect venous reflux in FH group. Venous reflux rates in the Doppler US, venous clinical severity scores (VCSSs), and clinical classes of Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classification were compared statistically in both groups.The mean VCSS was 3.87 ± 0.74 in the FH group and 2.68 ± 0.65 in the control group, which was statistically significant ( P = 0.04). In the more severe clinical classes of Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (C4-6), the number of limbs in the FH group was higher than in the control group (8 and 4, respectively). Doppler US examinations showed venous reflux in 22 of 32 limbs in the FH group and 19 of 32 patients in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.029). In the FH group, reflux could be shown only by augmentation method in the vast majority of limbs (16 of 22, 73%).In conclusion, VCSS and reflux rates are higher in limbs with CVI accompanied by FH. In addition, FH may cause false negative results in the evaluation of CVI. The use of augmentation method in limbs with FH can help avoid false negatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢静脉功能不全伴与不伴股疝的多普勒超声及临床特征比较。
摘要:本研究旨在评价下肢慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)患者伴股疝(FH)和不伴股疝(FH)的多普勒超声(US)及临床特征。我们回顾性分析了1364例疑似CVI肢体的前瞻性数据。32只肢体检出股疝,对照组32只肢体无FH。FH组采用Valsalva手法及增强法检测下肢静脉返流。对两组患者的多普勒超声静脉回流率、静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSSs)和临床病因解剖病理生理分类进行统计学比较。FH组平均VCSS为3.87±0.74,对照组为2.68±0.65,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。在临床-病因-解剖-病理生理(C4-6)较严重的临床分类中,FH组的肢体数量高于对照组(分别为8个和4个)。多普勒超声检查显示,FH组32例肢体中有22例出现静脉返流,对照组32例中有19例出现静脉返流,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.029)。在FH组中,绝大多数肢体只能通过增强法显示反流(22 / 16,73%)。综上所述,CVI合并FH的肢体VCSS和返流率较高。此外,FH在CVI评估中可能导致假阴性结果。下肢FH采用增强法可避免假阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
期刊最新文献
CEUS Is Possible Where MRI Is Impossible! Review of Clinical Applications of Sonazoid Ultrasound Contrast for Liver Evaluation. Cerebral, Splanchnic, and Renal Transit Time Measurement and Blood Volume Estimation Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography. Residual Ultrasound-Enhancing Agents Mimicking Portal Venous Gas. Objective Analysis of Predictive Value of Ultrasound Quantitative Scoring System for Treatment Method Selection in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1