Obstetric Ultrasonography in Postgraduate Radiology Training: A National Survey Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Ultrasound Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000629
Emre Emekli, Özlem Coşkun, Işil İrem Budakoğlu, Mahi Nur Cerit
{"title":"Obstetric Ultrasonography in Postgraduate Radiology Training: A National Survey Study.","authors":"Emre Emekli,&nbsp;Özlem Coşkun,&nbsp;Işil İrem Budakoğlu,&nbsp;Mahi Nur Cerit","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>There is no study in the literature that reveals the adequacy of obstetric ultrasonography (US) training in Turkey. We aimed to evaluate the adequacy of obstetric US training radiologists had received during their residency and determine how competent they considered themselves to be in this regard.A survey (27 items for residents, 21 items for specialists) was sent to all the radiology residents and specialists in Turkey through the mail list of the Turkish Society of Radiology.Ninety-one residents and 217 specialists participated in our study. Sixteen residents (17.6%) had received theoretical courses, 21 residents (23.1%) and 59 specialists (27.2%) had attended in-house obstetric US rotations, and 5 residents (5.5%) and 23 specialists (10.6%) had attended obstetric US rotations in another institution. When questioned separately for each trimester, only 11% to 36.3% of the residents stated that they took care of a sufficient number of patients. In general, 62.6% of the residents and 25.3% of the specialists did not consider themselves to be absolutely competent in obstetric US. The competency sources were specified as residency training by 44 residents (48.6%) and 55 specialists (25.3%), postgraduate training by 2 residents (2.2%) and 78 specialist (35.9%).In Turkey, current obstetric US training does not provide the experience that will allow physicians with radiology training to easily perform and interpret obstetric US. The main reasons for this situation include the limited number of patients the physicians took care of as a resident, insufficient rotation time, and lack of theoretical courses they attended.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: There is no study in the literature that reveals the adequacy of obstetric ultrasonography (US) training in Turkey. We aimed to evaluate the adequacy of obstetric US training radiologists had received during their residency and determine how competent they considered themselves to be in this regard.A survey (27 items for residents, 21 items for specialists) was sent to all the radiology residents and specialists in Turkey through the mail list of the Turkish Society of Radiology.Ninety-one residents and 217 specialists participated in our study. Sixteen residents (17.6%) had received theoretical courses, 21 residents (23.1%) and 59 specialists (27.2%) had attended in-house obstetric US rotations, and 5 residents (5.5%) and 23 specialists (10.6%) had attended obstetric US rotations in another institution. When questioned separately for each trimester, only 11% to 36.3% of the residents stated that they took care of a sufficient number of patients. In general, 62.6% of the residents and 25.3% of the specialists did not consider themselves to be absolutely competent in obstetric US. The competency sources were specified as residency training by 44 residents (48.6%) and 55 specialists (25.3%), postgraduate training by 2 residents (2.2%) and 78 specialist (35.9%).In Turkey, current obstetric US training does not provide the experience that will allow physicians with radiology training to easily perform and interpret obstetric US. The main reasons for this situation include the limited number of patients the physicians took care of as a resident, insufficient rotation time, and lack of theoretical courses they attended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科超声检查在研究生放射学培训中的应用:一项全国调查研究。
摘要:文献中没有研究显示土耳其产科超声(美国)培训的充分性。我们的目的是评估产科放射科医师在住院期间接受的美国培训的充分性,并确定他们认为自己在这方面的能力。通过土耳其放射学会的邮件列表向土耳其所有放射学住院医师和专家发送了一份调查问卷(居民27项,专家21项)。91名住院医师和217名专家参与了我们的研究。16名住院医师(17.6%)接受过理论课程,21名住院医师(23.1%)和59名专家(27.2%)参加过内部产科美国轮转,5名住院医师(5.5%)和23名专家(10.6%)在另一家机构参加过产科美国轮转。当对每个孕期分别进行询问时,只有11%到36.3%的住院医生表示他们照顾了足够数量的病人。总的来说,62.6%的住院医师和25.3%的专家认为自己在产科美国方面没有绝对的能力。其中住院医师44人(48.6%),专科55人(25.3%),研究生2人(2.2%),专科78人(35.9%)。在土耳其,目前的产科美国培训没有提供经验,使接受过放射学培训的医生能够轻松地执行和解释产科美国。造成这种情况的主要原因包括医生作为住院医生照顾的病人数量有限,轮转时间不足,以及他们参加的理论课程不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
期刊最新文献
CEUS Is Possible Where MRI Is Impossible! Review of Clinical Applications of Sonazoid Ultrasound Contrast for Liver Evaluation. Cerebral, Splanchnic, and Renal Transit Time Measurement and Blood Volume Estimation Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography. Residual Ultrasound-Enhancing Agents Mimicking Portal Venous Gas. Objective Analysis of Predictive Value of Ultrasound Quantitative Scoring System for Treatment Method Selection in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1