Medical students' general and radiology-specific motivation: Correlations, stability and associations with learning strategies and ability beliefs.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-26 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249586
Julia Gorges, Laureen Fröhlich, Andreas H Mahnken
{"title":"Medical students' general and radiology-specific motivation: Correlations, stability and associations with learning strategies and ability beliefs.","authors":"Julia Gorges, Laureen Fröhlich, Andreas H Mahnken","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated general and subject-specific motivational beliefs from the perspectives of self-determination theory (i.e. intrinsic, identified, introjected, and extrinsic motivation) and achievement goal theory (i.e. mastery, performance-approach, and -avoidance goal orientation including the respective classroom goal structures), their interrelations, their stability over time, and their associations with desirable outcomes (i.e. deep-level learning strategies, self-concept of ability). It was hypothesized that motivational beliefs are interrelated but demonstrate a distinct correlational pattern depending on whether they were assessed as general or subject-specific motivation. In addition, motivational beliefs were hypothesized to relate to learning strategies and ability beliefs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical students (<i>n</i> = 146) participated in this longitudinal study with measurement points at the beginning and end of a semester. The questionnaire included established motivational scales to assess motivational beliefs and desirable outcomes. Measurement models were tested using confirmatory factor analyses; correlations of scale means were investigated to assess the nomological network of motivational beliefs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, intrinsic and identified motivation were associated with mastery goal orientation and with desirable outcome variables, such as the use of deep-level learning strategies. General and subject-specific motivation exhibited distinct correlational patterns. Motivation was relatively stable over time. Results did not confirm the factor structure of classroom goal structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study emphasizes the benefit of a subject-specific conceptualization of motivation and the need for a careful adaptation of theoretical constructs from the secondary school context to make them fruitful for the promotion of medical students' motivation. Medical teachers can use established motivational interventions (e.g. using an individual frame of reference for feedback) to support students' adaptive motivational beliefs (e.g. self-determined motivation, mastery goals). Given the subject specificity of motivation, it seems beneficial to promote adaptive motivation in the respective medical specialty regardless of students' general motivational characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"359-365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated general and subject-specific motivational beliefs from the perspectives of self-determination theory (i.e. intrinsic, identified, introjected, and extrinsic motivation) and achievement goal theory (i.e. mastery, performance-approach, and -avoidance goal orientation including the respective classroom goal structures), their interrelations, their stability over time, and their associations with desirable outcomes (i.e. deep-level learning strategies, self-concept of ability). It was hypothesized that motivational beliefs are interrelated but demonstrate a distinct correlational pattern depending on whether they were assessed as general or subject-specific motivation. In addition, motivational beliefs were hypothesized to relate to learning strategies and ability beliefs.

Methods: Medical students (n = 146) participated in this longitudinal study with measurement points at the beginning and end of a semester. The questionnaire included established motivational scales to assess motivational beliefs and desirable outcomes. Measurement models were tested using confirmatory factor analyses; correlations of scale means were investigated to assess the nomological network of motivational beliefs.

Results: As expected, intrinsic and identified motivation were associated with mastery goal orientation and with desirable outcome variables, such as the use of deep-level learning strategies. General and subject-specific motivation exhibited distinct correlational patterns. Motivation was relatively stable over time. Results did not confirm the factor structure of classroom goal structure.

Conclusions: The study emphasizes the benefit of a subject-specific conceptualization of motivation and the need for a careful adaptation of theoretical constructs from the secondary school context to make them fruitful for the promotion of medical students' motivation. Medical teachers can use established motivational interventions (e.g. using an individual frame of reference for feedback) to support students' adaptive motivational beliefs (e.g. self-determined motivation, mastery goals). Given the subject specificity of motivation, it seems beneficial to promote adaptive motivation in the respective medical specialty regardless of students' general motivational characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生的一般学习动机和放射学学习动机:学习策略和能力信念的相关性、稳定性和关联性。
目的:本研究从自我决定理论(即内在动机、认同动机、内驱力和外在动机)和成就目标理论(即掌握目标、成绩目标和回避目标导向,包括各自的课堂目标结构)的角度,调查了一般动机信念和特定学科动机信念、它们之间的相互关系、它们随时间变化的稳定性,以及它们与理想结果(即深层次学习策略、自我能力概念)之间的关联。根据假设,动机信念是相互关联的,但根据它们是被评估为一般动机还是特定学科动机,会表现出不同的相关模式。此外,还假设动机信念与学习策略和能力信念有关:方法:医科学生(n = 146)参加了这项纵向研究,在学期开始和结束时进行测量。调查问卷包括既定的动机量表,用于评估动机信念和理想结果。测量模型通过确认性因子分析进行了检验;量表平均值的相关性也进行了调查,以评估动机信念的名义网络:正如预期的那样,内在动机和认同动机与掌握目标导向和理想结果变量(如深层次学习策略的使用)相关。一般动机和特定学科动机表现出不同的相关模式。随着时间的推移,学习动机相对稳定。研究结果没有证实课堂目标结构的因子结构:本研究强调了针对特定学科的学习动机概念化的益处,以及需要对中学背景下的理论建构进行仔细调整,使其在促进医学生的学习动机方面富有成效。医科教师可以利用已有的动机干预措施(如使用个人参照系进行反馈)来支持学生的适应性动机信念(如自我决定动机、掌握目标)。鉴于学习动机的学科特殊性,无论学生的一般学习动机特征如何,在相应的医学专业中促进适应性学习动机似乎都是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Edgar Dale's Pyramid of Learning in medical education: Is it still a scientific myth after Ken Masters' research? To use or not to use: ERIC database for medical education research. "They already trusted us a lot": Allied health students' experiences of an innovative hospital, service-focussed placement model. Response to: 'When reality no longer meets the curriculum, what needs to adapt?' The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: A quasi-experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1