Medical Teacher最新文献

Since 1991, there have been significant changes in medical education in Georgia. Key changes include adapting national legislation toward international standards, establishing the National Center for Education Quality Enhancement (NCEQE), which was recognized in 2018 by the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) as an accrediting agency and opening the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) International Networking Center in 2019. Undergraduate medical education, regulated by the Ministry of Education, Science and Youth of Georgia, spans six years. MD graduates then have options for further career paths, including working as junior doctors, residency, and/or pursuing PhD research.The main challenges the country presently faces are:the need to reduce the increasing number of (mainly) private medical schools. Recent updates to the national standards for undergraduate medical education have imposed stricter accreditation requirements for MD programs, resulting in the closure of schools that fail to meet these standards;postgraduate medical education is governed by the Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia (MOH) and needs further reform due to limited and paid residency positions;continuous professional development (CPD) was optional until recently, which led to an increase in professional inaccuracy and malpractice cases. To address this, regulatory bodies, including the MOH and professional associations, are preparing the legal basis for introducing compulsory CPD.

Background: There seems to be a common perception among medical educators that curiosity is untapped or even subjugated in medical education. This review aims to summarize research on curiosity across the fields of psychology, neuroscience, and education and report its potential to advance medical education.

Methods: For this narrative review multiple online libraries were searched using variations of the terms curiosity and school/education/learning. Additional studies were reviewed using the reference lists of included studies, and all studies were assessed for quality and relevance.

Results: This review of previous research on curiosity shows that curiosity can significantly impact characteristics relevant to medical education, particularly mental health and learning. In addition, the authors outline how curiosity is linked to other epistemic emotions such as anxiety, novelty, surprise, and uncertainty. Finally, an epistemic-emotion-framework (EEF) is proposed to help educators encourage curiosity in medical students.

Conclusion: By drawing from other research fields, medical educators can learn valuable lessons about the importance of curiosity and how to influence it. This review provides an overview of current research and a framework for how the potential of curiosity can be harnessed to play an important role in students' medical education.

Trigger warnings are statements offering prior notification of sensitive content, allowing recipients to prepare for and avoid ensuing distress. Students are increasingly reporting expectations for warnings in classrooms and learning contexts. Discussions regarding use of warnings have clear relevance to healthcare education, which regularly explores sensitive content. Their use has been positioned as a measure for inclusive education and as a means to enhance trauma awareness and empathy. Expectations for warnings need to be considered in the context of preparedness for professional practice. This Twelve Tips paper explores the evidence in relation to warnings and its applicability to social learning contexts. These tips highlight considerations and strategies for the use of warnings in the context of healthcare education, balancing issues of inclusivity, learner and educator wellbeing, and professional preparedness. These discussions are situated within the context of current classroom-based healthcare education.

Educational challenge: Electronic dance music (EDM) festivals - crowded, loud, low-resource environments - pose unique challenges to event medical teams. Simulation can prepare teams to manage clinical presentations in this unconventional context. Without access to simulation infrastructure, a low-technological, low-fidelity simulation modality is warranted.

Solution: Draw & Doodle Simulation (D&D SIM) is a low-fidelity simulation where patients are hand-drawn (i.e. on paper, whiteboard, or digitally) instead of utilizing manikins or live actors. Facilitators draw all patient findings, while participants doodle any possible interventions.

Solution implementation: Two D&D SIM cases (serotonin toxicity and refractory anaphylaxis) were piloted in classrooms. Participants included paramedics, medical students, lifeguards, and first aiders. Facilitators conducted simulations using chart paper, with each participant doodling contributions using differently colored markers.

Lessons learned: Participants responded positively, rating the serotonin toxicity case 4.31/5 (n = 13) and refractory anaphylaxis case 4.53/5 (n = 15). Participants appreciated the 'low-stakes', useful 'visual' representation of progress, 'fun and [interactivity]', and appropriate '[realism]' of D&D SIM. However, D&D SIM was perceived as 'less life threatening', would not be appropriate for physical skills (e.g. CPR), required everyone to be 'oriented in the same direction to see the drawing', and the chart paper risked becoming cluttered.

Next steps: Next steps include writing new cases, implementing D&D SIM in other teaching contexts, exploring its use in digital platforms, and studying its effectiveness against higher-fidelity simulation.

What was the educational challenge?: Medical students experience high rates of anxiety; frequent examinations are one contributing source. Students may perceive the observed structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) as particularly stressful. Strategies to reduce anxiety during OSCEs have not been described.

What was the solution?: We sought to implement and evaluate a simple, in-the-moment intervention aimed at reducing students' OSCE-related anxiety by making stress-reducing activities available during break stations during a summative pediatric OSCE.

How was the solution implemented?: Three break stations were included in an end-of-rotation, summative OSCE. Students were block-randomized to either control group with standard break stations, or intervention group with stress-reducing activities available in the break room. All participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and after the OSCE, and a short questionnaire after OSCE completion.

What lessons were learned that are relevant to a wider global audience?: Third-year medical students have high levels of stress before and after OSCEs. More than half of students in the intervention group felt their anxiety improved with activities. While the inclusion of stress-reducing activities in break stations did not impact exam performance, some students subjectively felt their performance improved. If OSCE break stations are logistically required, they can be employed to allow students to briefly relax during a high-stress exam without negatively impacting performance.

What are the next steps?: Next steps include exploration of opportunities for integration of stress-reducing activities during OSCEs with other learner groups, and identification of other stress-inducing aspects of medical training to provide similar opportunities.

Background: A significant factor of clinicians' learning is based on their ability to effectively transfer acquired knowledge, skills, and attitudes from specialty-specific clinical courses to their working environment.

Material and method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 anaesthesiologist trainees (i.e. residents) in four group and five individual interviews using SRL principles as sensitizing concepts. Data were collected and analyzed iteratively using thematic analysis.

Results: Advanced trainees are highly motivated to explore what they have learned in specialty-specific courses, but they often face several barriers in implementing their learning in the workplace environment. Four themes emerged from the interview data: 'Be ready to learn', "Take the 'take-home-messages' home', "Be ready to create your own opportunities', and "Face it, it's not entirely up to you'. Understanding the challenges regarding transferring knowledge from courses to the working environment is an important lesson for assisting trainees set their learning goals, monitor their progress, and re-evaluate their SRL processes.

Conclusion: Even for advanced trainees, successfully transferring knowledge from specialty-specific courses often requires adequate commitment and support. Medical supervisors and other relevant stakeholders must be aware of their shared responsibility for creating individual environments that support opportunities for trainees to self-regulate their learning.

The United States faces an impending crisis in primary care physician shortages, while Physician Associates (PAs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are poised to help bridge the gap. This manuscript explores a groundbreaking solution: introducing a clinical doctorate program tailored to PAs and NPs, designed to equip them with the knowledge and skills to assume leadership roles in primary care. Unlike traditional medical education, this innovative approach allows these professionals to continue their clinical practice while advancing their education, addressing the workforce shortage and the need for advanced leadership within the primary care landscape. This comprehensive curriculum includes intensive didactic coursework, residency-like training, credentialing examinations, and research opportunities, positioning PAs and NPs as critical contributors to the future of primary care. By recognizing their untapped potential and investing in their advanced education, we can elevate the quality and accessibility of primary care, ensuring that healthcare delivery reaches new heights.