Comparison of Ibuprofen with Ketorolac on the Control of Renal Colic Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.22037/uj.v20i.7572
Fuxian Cai, Yougang Liao, Shichun Jiang, Yuan Cao, Yaodong Wang
{"title":"Comparison of Ibuprofen with Ketorolac on the Control of Renal Colic Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.","authors":"Fuxian Cai, Yougang Liao, Shichun Jiang, Yuan Cao, Yaodong Wang","doi":"10.22037/uj.v20i.7572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The comparison of ibuprofen with ketorolac remains controversial for the pain control of renal colic. We therefore conduct this meta-analysis to compare the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen with ketorolac for renal colic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen in comparison with ketorolac for renal colic. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. In patients with renal colic pain, intravenous ibuprofen and ketorolac produced comparable pain scores at 15 min (MD = -0.46; 95% CI = -1.24 to 0.31; P = 0.24), 30 min (MD = -0.81; 95% CI = -1.75 to 0.31; P = 0.09), 60 min (MD=-0.63; 95% CI = -1.40 to 0.13; P = 0.10) and 120 min (MD = -0.74; 95% CI = -2.18 to 0.70; P = 0.31), as well as adverse events (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.49; P = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ibuprofen can obtain comparable analgesic efficacy to ketorolac for renal colic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"379-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The comparison of ibuprofen with ketorolac remains controversial for the pain control of renal colic. We therefore conduct this meta-analysis to compare the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen with ketorolac for renal colic.

Methods: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen in comparison with ketorolac for renal colic. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity.

Results: Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. In patients with renal colic pain, intravenous ibuprofen and ketorolac produced comparable pain scores at 15 min (MD = -0.46; 95% CI = -1.24 to 0.31; P = 0.24), 30 min (MD = -0.81; 95% CI = -1.75 to 0.31; P = 0.09), 60 min (MD=-0.63; 95% CI = -1.40 to 0.13; P = 0.10) and 120 min (MD = -0.74; 95% CI = -2.18 to 0.70; P = 0.31), as well as adverse events (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.49; P = 0.83).

Conclusion: Ibuprofen can obtain comparable analgesic efficacy to ketorolac for renal colic pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布洛芬与酮咯酸在控制肾绞痛方面的比较:随机对照研究的 Meta 分析。
目的:在控制肾绞痛疼痛方面,布洛芬与酮咯酸的比较仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,比较布洛芬与酮咯酸治疗肾绞痛的镇痛效果:截至 2022 年 12 月,我们在 PubMed、EMbase、Web of science、EBSCO 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中检索了评估布洛芬与酮咯酸治疗肾绞痛镇痛效果的随机对照试验 (RCT)。本荟萃分析根据异质性采用随机效应或固定效应模型:荟萃分析纳入了四项研究。在肾绞痛患者中,静脉注射布洛芬和酮洛酸在 15 分钟(MD = -0.46; 95% CI = -1.24 to 0.31; P = 0.24)、30 分钟(MD = -0.81; 95% CI = -1.75 to 0.31;P=0.09)、60 min(MD=-0.63;95% CI=-1.40~0.13;P=0.10)和120 min(MD=-0.74;95% CI=-2.18~0.70;P=0.31),以及不良事件(OR=0.95;95% CI=0.61~1.49;P=0.83).结论:结论:布洛芬对肾绞痛的镇痛效果与酮咯酸相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Bladder health in U.S. Shift Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study (NHANES). Effect of 3D Modeling of S-fusion Software on Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Underwent Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Prospective Study. Erectile Dysfunction and Ejaculatory Dysfunction in Covid-19 Recovered Patient: Temporary or Persistent? Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. A Comprehensive Review of the Complete Primary Repair Technique for Bladder-Exstrophy-Epispadias Reconstruction: First Surgical Attempt Should Be the Best One.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1