Changes in nasal, pharyngeal and salivary secretory IgA levels in patients with COVID-19 and the possibility of correction of their secretion using combined intranasal and oral administration of a pharmaceutical containing antigens of opportunistic microorganisms.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Drugs in Context Pub Date : 2023-06-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.7573/dic.2022-10-4
Mikhail Kostinov, Oksana Svitich, Alexander Chuchalin, Natalya Abramova, Valery Osiptsov, Ekaterina Khromova, Dmitry Pakhomov, Vitaly Tatevosov, Anna Vlasenko, Vilia Gainitdinova, Kirill Mashilov, Nadezhda Kryukova, Irina Baranova, Anton Kostinov
{"title":"Changes in nasal, pharyngeal and salivary secretory IgA levels in patients with COVID-19 and the possibility of correction of their secretion using combined intranasal and oral administration of a pharmaceutical containing antigens of opportunistic microorganisms.","authors":"Mikhail Kostinov, Oksana Svitich, Alexander Chuchalin, Natalya Abramova, Valery Osiptsov, Ekaterina Khromova, Dmitry Pakhomov, Vitaly Tatevosov, Anna Vlasenko, Vilia Gainitdinova, Kirill Mashilov, Nadezhda Kryukova, Irina Baranova, Anton Kostinov","doi":"10.7573/dic.2022-10-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although extensive research has been conducted on the role of local immunity in patients with SARS-CoV-2, little is known about the production and concentrations of secretory IgA (SIgA) in different mucosal compartments. This article aims to assess the secretion of SIgA in the nasal and pharyngeal compartments and saliva of patients with COVID-19 and to investigate the possibility and efficiency of correction of their secretion using combined intranasal and oral administration of a pharmaceutical containing antigens of opportunistic microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 78 inpatients, aged between 18 and 60 years, who had confirmed COVID-19 with moderate lung involvement. The control group (<i>n</i>=45) received basic therapy, and the treatment group (<i>n</i>=33) was additionally administered the bacteria-based pharmaceutical Immunovac VP4 from day 1 to day 10 of hospitalization. SIgA levels were measured by ELISA at baseline and on days 14 and 30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No systemic or local reactions associated with Immunovac VP4 were reported. We observed a statistically significant reduction in the duration of fever and hospitalization in patients who received Immunovac VP4 compared with those from the control group (<i>p</i>=0.03 and <i>p</i>=0.05, respectively). Changes over time in SIgA levels in nasal swabs were found to be significantly different in the two treatment groups (F=7.9, <i>p</i>[78.0]<0.001). On day 14 of observation, patients in the control group showed a statistically significant reduction in SIgA levels from baseline (<i>p</i>=0.02), whereas patients in the Immunovac VP4 group had stable SIgA levels (<i>p</i>=0.07). On day 30 after the start of treatment, there was a statistically significant increase in SIgA levels in the Immunovac VP4 group compared with baseline (from 77.7 (40.5-98.7) μg/L to 113.4 (39.8-156.7) μg/L; <i>p</i>=0.05) and the levels measured on day 14 (from 60.2 (23.3-102.9) μg/L to 113.4 (39.8-156.7) μg/L; <i>p</i>=0.03). The control group showed a statistically significant decrease in levels of nasal SIgA (to 37.3) on day 30 (<i>p</i>=0.007 for comparison with baseline values and <i>p</i>=0.04 for comparison with levels measured on day 14). Changes over time in SIgA levels measured in pharyngeal swabs were also different between the two treatment groups, and this difference reached statistical significance (F=6.5, <i>p</i>[73.0]=0.003). In the control group, this parameter did not change throughout the study (<i>p</i>=0.17 for a comparison between the levels measured on day 14 and the baseline values, and <i>p</i>=0.12 for a comparison between the levels measured on day 30 and the baseline values). In the Immunovac VP4 group, there was a statistically significant increase from baseline in SIgA levels on study day 30: from 1.5 (0.2-16.5) μg/L to 29.8 (3.6-106.8) μg/L (<i>p</i>=0.02). Changes over time in salivary SIgA did not show a significant difference between study groups (F=0.3, <i>p</i>[66.3]=0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As part of combination therapy, the bacteria-based immunostimulant agent Immunovac VP4 increases SIgA levels in the nasal and pharyngeal compartments and induces clinical improvement. Induced mucosal immunity is central to the prevention of respiratory infections, particularly in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"12 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/48/dic-2022-10-4.PMC10278444.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2022-10-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although extensive research has been conducted on the role of local immunity in patients with SARS-CoV-2, little is known about the production and concentrations of secretory IgA (SIgA) in different mucosal compartments. This article aims to assess the secretion of SIgA in the nasal and pharyngeal compartments and saliva of patients with COVID-19 and to investigate the possibility and efficiency of correction of their secretion using combined intranasal and oral administration of a pharmaceutical containing antigens of opportunistic microorganisms.

Methods: This study included 78 inpatients, aged between 18 and 60 years, who had confirmed COVID-19 with moderate lung involvement. The control group (n=45) received basic therapy, and the treatment group (n=33) was additionally administered the bacteria-based pharmaceutical Immunovac VP4 from day 1 to day 10 of hospitalization. SIgA levels were measured by ELISA at baseline and on days 14 and 30.

Results: No systemic or local reactions associated with Immunovac VP4 were reported. We observed a statistically significant reduction in the duration of fever and hospitalization in patients who received Immunovac VP4 compared with those from the control group (p=0.03 and p=0.05, respectively). Changes over time in SIgA levels in nasal swabs were found to be significantly different in the two treatment groups (F=7.9, p[78.0]<0.001). On day 14 of observation, patients in the control group showed a statistically significant reduction in SIgA levels from baseline (p=0.02), whereas patients in the Immunovac VP4 group had stable SIgA levels (p=0.07). On day 30 after the start of treatment, there was a statistically significant increase in SIgA levels in the Immunovac VP4 group compared with baseline (from 77.7 (40.5-98.7) μg/L to 113.4 (39.8-156.7) μg/L; p=0.05) and the levels measured on day 14 (from 60.2 (23.3-102.9) μg/L to 113.4 (39.8-156.7) μg/L; p=0.03). The control group showed a statistically significant decrease in levels of nasal SIgA (to 37.3) on day 30 (p=0.007 for comparison with baseline values and p=0.04 for comparison with levels measured on day 14). Changes over time in SIgA levels measured in pharyngeal swabs were also different between the two treatment groups, and this difference reached statistical significance (F=6.5, p[73.0]=0.003). In the control group, this parameter did not change throughout the study (p=0.17 for a comparison between the levels measured on day 14 and the baseline values, and p=0.12 for a comparison between the levels measured on day 30 and the baseline values). In the Immunovac VP4 group, there was a statistically significant increase from baseline in SIgA levels on study day 30: from 1.5 (0.2-16.5) μg/L to 29.8 (3.6-106.8) μg/L (p=0.02). Changes over time in salivary SIgA did not show a significant difference between study groups (F=0.3, p[66.3]=0.75).

Conclusion: As part of combination therapy, the bacteria-based immunostimulant agent Immunovac VP4 increases SIgA levels in the nasal and pharyngeal compartments and induces clinical improvement. Induced mucosal immunity is central to the prevention of respiratory infections, particularly in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 患者鼻腔、咽部和唾液分泌型 IgA 水平的变化,以及使用含有机会性微生物抗原的药物联合鼻腔和口腔给药纠正其分泌的可能性。
背景:尽管对 SARS-CoV-2 患者局部免疫的作用进行了广泛的研究,但对不同粘膜区分泌型 IgA(SIgA)的产生和浓度却知之甚少。本文旨在评估 COVID-19 患者鼻腔、咽部和唾液中分泌的 SIgA,并研究使用含有机会性微生物抗原的药物联合鼻腔和口腔给药纠正其分泌的可能性和效率:这项研究包括78名确诊为COVID-19并中度肺部受累的住院病人,年龄在18至60岁之间。对照组(45 人)接受基本治疗,治疗组(33 人)在住院第 1 天至第 10 天期间额外服用细菌药物 Immunovac VP4。在基线、第14天和第30天,用酶联免疫吸附法测定SIgA水平:结果:未发现与 Immunovac VP4 相关的全身或局部反应。我们观察到,与对照组相比,接受Immunovac VP4治疗的患者发烧和住院时间明显缩短(分别为p=0.03和p=0.05)。鼻拭子中的SIgA水平随时间的变化在两个治疗组中有显著差异(F=7.9,p[78.0]p=0.02),而Immunovac VP4组患者的SIgA水平稳定(p=0.07)。在治疗开始后的第 30 天,Immunovac VP4 组的 SIgA 水平与基线(从 77.7 (40.5-98.7) μg/L 升至 113.4 (39.8-156.7) μg/L;p=0.05)和第 14 天测量的水平(从 60.2 (23.3-102.9) μg/L 升至 113.4 (39.8-156.7) μg/L;p=0.03)相比有显著的统计学增长。对照组的鼻腔 SIgA 水平在第 30 天出现了统计学意义上的显著下降(降至 37.3)(与基线值相比,p=0.007;与第 14 天测量的水平相比,p=0.04)。咽拭子中测得的 SIgA 水平随时间的变化在两个治疗组之间也存在差异,而且这种差异具有统计学意义(F=6.5,p[73.0]=0.003)。在对照组中,这一参数在整个研究期间没有变化(第 14 天测量的水平与基线值比较,p=0.17;第 30 天测量的水平与基线值比较,p=0.12)。在 Immunovac VP4 组,研究第 30 天的 SIgA 水平与基线值相比有显著的统计学增长:从 1.5(0.2-16.5)微克/升增至 29.8(3.6-106.8)微克/升(p=0.02)。研究组之间唾液 SIgA 随时间的变化没有显著差异(F=0.3,p[66.3]=0.75):结论:作为联合疗法的一部分,基于细菌的免疫刺激剂 Immunovac VP4 可提高鼻腔和咽部的 SIgA 水平,并诱导临床症状改善。诱导粘膜免疫是预防呼吸道感染的核心,尤其是对 COVID-19 后综合征患者而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Context
Drugs in Context Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers all phases of original research: laboratory, animal and human/clinical studies, health economics and outcomes research, and postmarketing studies. Original research that shows positive or negative results are welcomed. Invited review articles may cover single-drug reviews, drug class reviews, latest advances in drug therapy, therapeutic-area reviews, place-in-therapy reviews, new pathways and classes of drugs. In addition, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are welcomed and may be published as original research if performed per accepted guidelines. Editorials of key topics and issues in drugs and therapeutics are welcomed. The Editor-in-Chief will also consider manuscripts of interest in areas such as technologies that support diagnosis, assessment and treatment. EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines should be followed for each article type. GPP3 Guidelines should be followed for any industry-sponsored manuscripts. Other Editorial sections may include Editorial, Case Report, Conference Report, Letter-to-the-Editor, Educational Section.
期刊最新文献
Good scientific practice of using worldwide post-marketing surveillance data to ensure safety with HAALI BDDE cross-linked hyaluronic acid fillers. Inclisiran for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Liquid antipsychotics in the management of psychomotor agitation: a focus on promazine. Patient journey in cystinosis: focus on non-adherence and disease management. Pharmacovigilance monitoring and treatment adherence in patients on antihypertensive drugs at a tertiary care centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1